Who wins prime Lewis v prime Tyson?

[spanky-banky]

where talking prime vs prime and tysons prime, his absoloute peak was 1988. and that version off tyson would be a handfull for most. you know little in the fact that you think anyone whos not affraid and can take a punch will automatically kill tyson
and i know u think tyson only ever beat bums ....spinks, thomas, williams, berbick,tubbs,smith,biggs,and holmes were not bums and yeah holmes was 38 but he still had never been koed and was never koed after that but tyson knocked him out cold,something prime holyfield couldnt do to an even older version of holmes. and spinks was a natural light heavy but he would have givin holyfield a run for his money and he ko cooney who was twice his size . so it was a good win for tyson

Right i see you mentioned these names about 6 times today im going to tell you little fact

Spinks was natural Lightheavy only got title getting 2 gifts off a faded Holmes

Pinklon Thomas had talent but he had just got out of rehab

Carl Williams had talent but his chin was badly weak

Berbick had been koed in 1 round before Tyson got to him and lost every round against Holmes

Tubbs had 2 weeks to prepare and was badly out of shape

Smith lol don't make me laugh he lost to Marvis Frazier

Biggs is like Williams had talent but his chin was badly weak and he never beat an elite fighter just like Williams

Holmes 38 2 weeks to train on losing streak and hadn't fought in nearly 2 years.

smith also murdered tim witherspoon.
you say carl's chin was so bad, but holmes couldnt put him away?
thomas had angelo dundee and was very good, but i didnt know he just got out of rehab. so ill take your word on that one.
and where do you get this 2 weeks crap from? acording to you all tyson opponents only get 2 weeks to train for a fight? holmes and tubbs were givin sufficient time to train, they were just beaten by a better man who was in his prime!
and why do you discount spinks as just a light heavy? he was a good HW that could match it with the best.holmes had 30 rds to ko him and he couldnt!
you say tyson is overrated but you also think ALI is overrated?
just keepin it real mr icecold

[spanky-banky]

tyson vs tucker....i would give a maximum 3rds to tucker. and im being very generous

[Tysonbruno]

yet Holyfield trained between 12 - 16 week for 1st Tyson fight yet Tyson trained 4 week so that must be why he got beat Holmes had more than 2 week

[Dark Lord Al]

Lewis wins
Tyson never won a fight were the guy hit him back

[Tysonbruno]

Hi were your hosts for tonight Tysonbruno and Troy McClure

[Tysonbruno]

Lewis wins
Tyson never won a fight were the guy hit him back

All the other guys he fought then had there hands tied did they and never hit him get a grip fella when you watch a fight face the tv

[ICB]

where talking prime vs prime and tysons prime, his absoloute peak was 1988. and that version off tyson would be a handfull for most. you know little in the fact that you think anyone whos not affraid and can take a punch will automatically kill tyson
and i know u think tyson only ever beat bums ....spinks, thomas, williams, berbick,tubbs,smith,biggs,and holmes were not bums and yeah holmes was 38 but he still had never been koed and was never koed after that but tyson knocked him out cold,something prime holyfield couldnt do to an even older version of holmes. and spinks was a natural light heavy but he would have givin holyfield a run for his money and he ko cooney who was twice his size . so it was a good win for tyson

Right i see you mentioned these names about 6 times today im going to tell you little fact

Spinks was natural Lightheavy only got title getting 2 gifts off a faded Holmes

Smith koed a Witherspoon who was having drug problems and bad dealings with King his head wasn't in the game in his prime he easily dealt with Smith

Pinklon Thomas had talent but he had just got out of rehab

Carl Williams had talent but his chin was badly weak

Berbick had been koed in 1 round before Tyson got to him and lost every round against Holmes

Tubbs had 2 weeks to prepare and was badly out of shape

Smith lol don't make me laugh he lost to Marvis Frazier

Biggs is like Williams had talent but his chin was badly weak and he never beat an elite fighter just like Williams

Holmes 38 2 weeks to train on losing streak and hadn't fought in nearly 2 years.

smith also murdered tim witherspoon.
you say carl's chin was so bad, but holmes couldnt put him away?
thomas had angelo dundee and was very good, but i didnt know he just got out of rehab. so ill take your word on that one.
and where do you get this 2 weeks crap from? acording to you all tyson opponents only get 2 weeks to train for a fight? holmes and tubbs were givin sufficient time to train, they were just beaten by a better man who was in his prime!
and why do you discount spinks as just a light heavy? he was a good HW that could match it with the best.holmes had 30 rds to ko him and he couldnt!
you say tyson is overrated but you also think ALI is overrated?
just keepin it real mr icecold

Holmes isn't a puncher just like Ali couldn't put Norton away he isn't puncher James Tillis decked Williams twice its well known Williams chin is like glass

And it isn't crap Tubbs said himself he had 2 weeks to train because he was a replacement i believe

And again with this Holmes couldn't ko Spinks firstly he was fading and was shot secondly it doesn't matter if he couldn't ko him he still won both fights to 98 percent of the public

Tyson is overrated Ali is a tad overrated but atleast he beat great fighters in there prime i never said Ali is overrated in his opponents i mean when people say he can beat anyone and thats ditto for Tyson except Ali beat great fighters Tyson didn't.

[spanky-banky]

Hi were your hosts for tonight Tysonbruno and Troy McClure

you might remember us from such boxing threads as tyson vs lewis

[Tysonbruno]

Tyson ko'd Holmes were'nt he a great fighter?

[BIG H]

Can't beleive we are back to this on 'Tucker won 4 rounds' chesnut. It would be a lame argumnent even if it wre true, because it would mean Tyson won 2/3 of the fight. The fact that makes if even more lame is that Tucker didn't win 4 rounds, he probably only won 2 and none of the judges gave Tucker 4 rounds. 2 Judges gave him two 10-9 rounds and the other judge gave him 3.

[ICB]

Tyson ko'd Holmes were'nt he a great fighter?

A shot one.

[Tysonbruno]

He were'nt that shot fella because he went on to have good fights

[ICB]

Can't beleive we are back to this on 'Tucker won 4 rounds' chesnut. It would be a lame argumnent even if it wre true, because it would mean Tyson won 2/3 of the fight. The fact that makes if even more lame is that Tucker didn't win 4 rounds, he probably only won 2 and none of the judges gave Tucker 4 rounds. 2 Judges gave him two 10-9 rounds and the other judge gave him 3.

Yes we are because if i use Douglas argument people say his prime was finished if i say Tillis gave Tyson all he could handle its Tyson hadn't reached his peak if i use Ruddock argument people say samething he was past it so what other argument can i use ?? i give up because theres always an excuse with Tyson and his struggles or losses.

And your not that much better BIG H with your Oliver and Rahman argument

[ICB]

He were'nt that shot fella because he went on to have good fights

Read my other statement about Holmes because i've already said why he was shot.

[Tysonbruno]

Hi were your hosts for tonight Tysonbruno and Troy McClure

you might remember us from such boxing threads as tyson vs lewis

HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE That was me laughing like Bruno