
Originally Posted by
WelshDevilRob

Originally Posted by
slk123
Ali quit when he was 39 yrs old and had 56 fights. The competition in many peoples opinion (not mine) was better at that time so it stands to reason that he retired. Lennox on the other hand quit at 38 yrs old and had only 41 fights. The competition at that time and since then, hasn\'t been as good (again not my opinion) with the exception of two very good fighters, the Klitschkos. Lennox\'s last fight left many people believing he was well on his way to a loss before the cut and in order to prove himself, needed to fight the rematch.
Instead, he quit/retired in fear of a rematch due to the fact he would actually have to train hard in order to win decisively. He realized that Vitali was much more game than imagined and his brother was a better boxer than Lewis and would most probably win because of his heart and determination even though he just got tko\'d by Sanders.
Hey Rotten, I couldn\'t agree with you more that it was a good stoppage. That was one of the ugliest cuts I\'ve ever seen in a fight.
I was implying that Ali took too many fights and even his trainer Angulo Dundee said he had 3 fights too many. Dr Ferdie Pacheo left the Ali camp because he knew Ali was already ill, call it punchdrunk or Parkinsons. The 2 Leon Spinks fights, Larry Holmes and Trevor Berbick fights never should have happened as it was clear that Ali was already damaged. But you seem to think he retired at the right time? No way!
Lennox knew his skills, motivation etc had lessened and called it a day. He won the Klitschko fight and retired and he has his health incheck.
Obviously you want fighters to go on past their best and risk serious damage which I find an appalling way of thinking.
Boxing is not a game it\'s a hurt business.
Also Wladimir Klitschko is not as good as his brother so how you figure he would win when he got sparked by Corrie Sanders and then Lamon Brewster is beyond comprehension.
I don\'t know but I think Wlad\'s chin was as good as Lewis\'. I\'ll check with McCall and Rahman on that one.
So It\'s it\'s popular opinion that Ali fought too long. Fine, I can admit I was wrong, he didn\'t retire at the right time, he retired 3 fights past the right time.
As for fighters in general, it is absurd for you to think I want them to continue past their best and risk serious damage. I wouldn\'t be a FAN of boxing if I felt that way.
As for Lewis, popular opinion at the time was that the only \"real\" competion out there were the Klitschko bros. It would have served to cement his legacy had he fought and won a decisive victory, as in, out boxing Vitali rather than the fight ending with Lewis being out boxed. Lewis came in fat and out of shape in the Rahman I fight and it cost him dearly. Just look at the difference in how Lewis looked between I and II. There was no comparison and even Lewis himself admitted he didn\'t want to work to get in to shape anymore BUT he couldn\'t very well go out on a KO so he trained hard to fight Rahman again. So he comes in out of shape again but gets the win via a tko by a cut then retires. Way to take the easy road out. IMO he knew he had his a** handed to him and he had no answers so he wasn\'t going to train hard in order to take another a** whipping. I can guarantee you though, had HE been stopped by cuts or KO, he definately wouldn\'t have retired.
Lewis didn\'t retire because he was too old, he retired because he was too lazy. There have been more than a couple of fighters going past 40 and you don\'t see them saying \"well I\'m too old but I continue to fight anyway\".
Bookmarks