Ice, you are missing the point. Nobody is arguing who is the best amongst the two as there really is no comparison. We all know who was the real champion. But the real champion is not always the lineal champion.Originally Posted by Ice Cold Boxing
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Ice, you are missing the point. Nobody is arguing who is the best amongst the two as there really is no comparison. We all know who was the real champion. But the real champion is not always the lineal champion.Originally Posted by Ice Cold Boxing
As I said before, I believe that after the title is vacated, the next unification bout decides who the next lineal champion is. It does not have to be the next undisputed champion. That is why there is no lineal champion at HW. No unification fight made since Lewis retired.
Thats what i was basically implying with my comment.Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
If the Ibragimov-Chagaev fight had gone ahead, the winner would be the lineal Heavyweight champion of the world? Jesus.Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
Also, one question to Mick, who have done very well on this thread:
When you say "regarded as the two best fighters in the weightclass", then regarded by whom exactly? I take it you mean the Ring, because 'general consensus' seems like a very subjective and elusive thing that doesn't really go down well with the idea of establishing an 'objective lineal champ'. The RJJ debate on this thread actually being a case in point for that.
Array
Hey Mick this is sorta of topic but who was the last linear champ at 130? Was It Brian Mitchell?
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks