I don't think Haye would steamroll Arreola at all. I think it would be a bombs away struggle from both sides!!!
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
So we have the trainer of fighter A saying his guy bashed the other up in sparring, while the trainer of fighter B disputes it?
Stands to reason that its Hayes mob lying doesnt it, VD says so.
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Can you provide a link with Adam Booth saying that Haye lit up Arreola in sparring? It is interesting news if indeed true.
The argument is moot because they won't fight. It is safe to say, however, that from the posts here, about 85% of the posters believe Haye would destroy Arreola.
Who is Haye fighting next if he isn't fighting a Klitschko? Will he step up the competition?
I have been trying to find it on youtube, as it was a tv interview where i saw the comment, if Haye doesnt fight the Klits will he step it up? From Barrett? Well of course he will Barrett was a decent first opponent to take at heavyweight, some of the posters on here make me laugh not you but a few in one instance what has Haye done to deserve a shot at any of the Klits but the same people critizize him for fighting Barrett who was ranked top 10 by two organisations as an easy touch. You cant win.
Areolla seriously needs to dump his trainer/best mate, the quote from the interview early in the post i read the full interview aswell as watched the Areolla doco on HBO, no wonder this guy is not in shape his trainer is a yes man who is his best buddy, in the interview he says its hard to get Areolla motivated, he aint pushing big Chris the way he should be.
I didn't want to start another thread of David Haye. So I'll start here. I have recently picked up The Ring magazine and David Haye is on the cover. After reading through and the writer clearly in love with David Haye comparing him to " the fastest hands and feet since Muhammed Ali" and physique wise Ali esique standing at 6'2 215 lbs. So I click over to you tube and check the Barrett fight out again. I couldn't believe how these writer's are saying this man is the next great heavyweight. First thing his hands are no were near as fast as Ali,he looked as if he were a plotter no bouncing on his toes or any of that. His combination's are very simple left hook,right hand. To me the biggest thing of all he has fought a very mediocre heavyweight in Barrett. I can not see how some people in this thread put Arreola down when he has fought the like's of very huge men who a very talented , Malcolm Tann,Travis Walker, Chazz Witherspoon (not huge but big) these guy's are no slouches. I would like to see Haye fight some of these guy's IMO he would be put to the test and fall short. Yes he has raw power but in the Cruiserweight division. The best thing to look at is Bob Foster. A dynamic puncher in the lightheavyweight division and when he stepped up to fight Frazier and Ali he couldn't hurt them at all.
Facts are facts Haye has been stopped by an older veteran,he has been down against Mormeck a DECENT puncher nothing great. As it looked when I seen it Haye looked like he was down in the Barrett fight. He did slip but the punch did land cleanly. That's another thing he got hit very easily in the cruiserweight's and in the Barrett fight. I would like to see him get hit by Wlad's right hand that flush and stand upright. He is the most overrated heavyweight as he has not fought anyone worth of note but yet is the best heavyweight in the division right now to British fans and The Ring magazine writer's. The most overhyped heavyweight of all time right next to Primo Carnera as of right now.
Seriously are you new to Boxing? Sparring sessions are played up big these days. Mayweather-Spadafora. Morales-Valero. Margarito-Williams. You ever hear about Arreola-Haye? Nope. Never happened.
Well that can't be. Because Haye and his people are above that. Right?
Last time I checked Arreola is undefeated. Is Haye? Nope. Arreola is a fat fukk. No doubt. But why is Haye the one with the stamina problem?
Maybe it happened, maybe it didnt, I really couldnt care less. I'll let you decide for yourself if it happened or not based solely on which one you like and which one you dont. I am above that.
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Alright.
People are forgetting the fact that Arreola was down in his last fight as well.
Legitimately down with no dispute about a slip or whatever.
Imo it doesnt matter how many times a fighter goes down it matters how many times he gets up and wins.
But Arreola is open for everything. and if it was haye who dropped him in the first round he may not have went to the second.
Of the two fighters Haye has the more chance of ourboxing Arreola. if haye isnt wild swinging and going for the knockout all 3 mins every round then he can cleanly outbox Arreola. I do think its a little unfair how people pick the one moment he Barret fight where he was wild against Arreola I don't think he'd be as wild, and I think he was so wild at those points with BArret because he wasnt worried about his power, against Arreola I think he would box a lot more and not be so wild. Haye CAN sorta box, and he does that a lot better then Arreola who is a slugger, if haye goes toe to toe with Arreola then yes he has a chance of gasing late and being stopped if he can't hurt him. But Haye can also outbox Arreola on his way to a decision, if Haye starts boxing Arreola and counterpunching him well there is little Arreola can do but land one bomb and have Haye ratted long enough to stop him. I don't know why everyone thinks that Haye's strategy against Arreola would be to slug.
I doubt Arreola is good enough to be a sparring partner for Haye.
Why chose him (Arreola) anyway? There's millions of fat nightclub bouncers all over the world.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks