Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 52 of 52

Thread: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

Share/Bookmark
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?

    id like to have seen him fight witter

    much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
    As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.
    why would witter have been a shocking opponent?

    only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something

    what pedigree does ortiz have?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sunderland, England
    Posts
    1,705
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    881
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post

    why would witter have been a shocking opponent?

    only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something

    what pedigree does ortiz have?
    Well he hasn't fought in a year and half and has said himself he can't physically make 140 anymore. He'd also be 37 by the time the fight comes round, and after such a long lay off that won't be a good thing. He's not particularly relevant now, in his last fight he lost to Alexander who we've all seen isn't at the level required to be at the top of the 140 division yet. And he also lost to Bradley, so I don't see any sense in taking on someone that 2 of your main rivals have already beaten... I just think it would have been a bad fight to make. He's fading, if not shot, has had a long lay off and would be very weight drained. I'm glad it wasn't made.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1206
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The fact that this is ppv means it is a waste of space.
    Very Oscar De La Hoya'ish.
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    914
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The fact that this is ppv means it is a waste of space.
    Very Oscar De La Hoya'ish.
    Agreed.

    Sky used to be quite picky with their ppvs to be fair to them, only used to charge for THE fights.

    Now they charge £15 for any old shite.
    Last edited by boxingbantz; 02-13-2011 at 06:23 PM.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1783
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?

    id like to have seen him fight witter

    much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
    As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.
    why would witter have been a shocking opponent?

    only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something

    what pedigree does ortiz have?
    Witter just lost again, he's pretty much done IMO. He gassed out again.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1401
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?

    id like to have seen him fight witter

    much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
    As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.
    why would witter have been a shocking opponent?

    only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something

    what pedigree does ortiz have?
    Witter just lost again, he's pretty much done IMO. He gassed out again.
    Witter would have been a shocking opponent for Khan based on the 5 rounds i saw last night.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by ono View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    why would witter have been a shocking opponent?

    only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something

    what pedigree does ortiz have?
    Witter just lost again, he's pretty much done IMO. He gassed out again.
    Witter would have been a shocking opponent for Khan based on the 5 rounds i saw last night.
    I think we all knew it before hand. Eric was clinging on to Witter's past glories.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 02-04-2011, 06:02 PM
  2. Khan v McCloskey
    By erics44 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 03:57 PM
  3. Anyone Heard Of Paul McCloskey
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 02:02 PM
  4. Colin Lynes - Paul McCloskey
    By Phil in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-03-2008, 11:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing