How many kids does it take....................

[Memphis]

I ate their livers with some Turkey twizzlers and a sunny delight.........Fffff....Fffff....Ffff.....Ffffff

[JT Rock]

I ate their livers with some Turkey twizzlers and a sunny delight.........Fffff....Fffff....Ffff.....Ffffff

OH SHITE!!!! and have a for the road

[JT Rock]

Been looking all morning for a thread worth replying to. I've been laughing for the past 20 minutes.

At first I thought I'd maybe last about 1/2 hour just swinging wildly before getting to tired to defend myself, but then I read Jtrock's suggestioon of piling the bodies, kids as young asthat wouldn't be able to climb fast at all, could last for days with that strategy until dehydration or something sets in. CC to Bilbo, and jtroch in 24 hrs for an ingenious solution.

Self preservation is the name of the Game

[Taeth]

could 5 year olds kill full grown humans? Anyways I would go for the throat on every single child easiest way to take them out...I bet Neo could handle this... he did well vs. 100 agent smiths.

[CityOfGod]

If you could kill enough that they'd pile up, you could make a barrage that they wouldn't climb over.

You could survive by using your zippo lighter to cook their little hands and feet and eat them.

"I love children too.........perhaps we can swap recipes?"

[Kev]

If you could kill enough that they'd pile up, you could make a barrage that they wouldn't climb over.

You could survive by using your zippo lighter to cook their little hands and feet and eat them.

"I love children too.........perhaps we can swap recipes?"

You atually make it sound quite fun, could be like an alternative action man's holiday.

Probably could really happen in Germany...............

[B@rr3r@]

Most school halls have them monkey bar apparatus, for PE so I would climb that and stay up there and kick any that got near, although at 5 it would be very difficult!

[TheBESTP4P]

i sense some michael jackson envy here

[B@rr3r@]

Gary Glitter would be in heaven.......

[Preme]

Ok this is a sort of philosophical question that I saw on a website forum a couple of years ago. It generated loads of thought and humourous discussion so I thought I'd share it here.

Ok, here it is,

The Challenge

You are in a sports hall where you will be in a fight to the death involving you and an infinite number of 5 year old children.

The children have been trained, as best as kids can be, to take you down by swarming on you, and grappling and forcing you to the ground where they will then kick , punch and bite you to death.

You have to fend them off for as long as possible. You are all unarmed.

The question is how many kids could you kill before they overpowered you and what would your survival tactics be?

Now some of you may think you could never be killed by a bunch of 5 year olds, but remember they will keep coming indefinitely so eventually you will succumb, but after how long?

Whoever comes up with a higer score (more kills) than somebody else, has to justify it with a thourough analysis of why and how.



PS. This is pure speculation only and I in no way endorse beating up small children :P

Well perhaps just the really annoying ones

How many could i kill? hard to say but it sounds liek they would not stop untill i was dead so i would choose not to kill any.

[Jody Lane]

Ok this is a sort of philosophical question that I saw on a website forum a couple of years ago. It generated loads of thought and humourous discussion so I thought I'd share it here.

Ok, here it is,

The Challenge

You are in a sports hall where you will be in a fight to the death involving you and an infinite number of 5 year old children.

The children have been trained, as best as kids can be, to take you down by swarming on you, and grappling and forcing you to the ground where they will then kick , punch and bite you to death.

You have to fend them off for as long as possible. You are all unarmed.

The question is how many kids could you kill before they overpowered you and what would your survival tactics be?

Now some of you may think you could never be killed by a bunch of 5 year olds, but remember they will keep coming indefinitely so eventually you will succumb, but after how long?

Whoever comes up with a higer score (more kills) than somebody else, has to justify it with a thourough analysis of why and how.



PS. This is pure speculation only and I in no way endorse beating up small children :P

Well perhaps just the really annoying ones

I have to admit I thought I'd never see some kind of thread like this one, let alone 5 pages of responses. I am proven wrong.

[PRIDE OF BOSTON]

71 REPLIES....LOL ! WTF this is hilarious...

[B@rr3r@]

71 REPLIES....LOL ! WTF this is hilarious...

I would never be killed, well of old age, as kids do the opposite of what you say, so i would keep screaming "kill me you little bastards, eat me and destroy all that I am"

[X]

I think if you survived the original onslaught, and managed to make some weapons (out of the dead children) and if you did manage to create some sort of defensive barricade comprised of dead children, and accepting that you could eat them and drink their blood to stay alive indefinitely - eventually, you could capture one child and retrain it.

If you kept doing this, assuming that you had truly made a safe barrier so that the bloodthirsty little fuckers could not get you, you could eventually create your own army of 7 year olds, who you could then use to kidnap and retrain new 5 year olds.

Your invincible army of 7 year olds would each be bigger and older than the army of 5 year olds. IN theory, there would be an infinite number of both and they would mathematically (given enough time) be evenly matched.

The potentially fit (female?) ones that you have captured could be kept in captivity until they get hairy bits and used as sex slaves. When they get boring old used up, just toss them to the slavering pack of 5 year olds.

See, the power of positive thinking turns a potentially nasty situation into a good one?

[PRIDE OF BOSTON]

I think if you survived the original onslaught, and managed to make some weapons (out of the dead children) and if you did manage to create some sort of defensive barricade comprised of dead children, and accepting that you could eat them and drink their blood to stay alive indefinitely - eventually, you could capture one child and retrain it.

If you kept doing this, assuming that you had truly made a safe barrier so that the bloodthirsty little f***** could not get you, you could eventually create your own army of 7 year olds, who you could then use to kidnap and retrain new 5 year olds.

Your invincible army of 7 year olds would each be bigger and older than the army of 5 year olds. IN theory, there would be an infinite number of both and they would mathematically (given enough time) be evenly matched.

The potentially fit (female?) ones that you have captured could be kept in captivity until they get hairy bits and used as sex slaves. When they get boring old used up, just toss them to the slavering pack of 5 year olds.

See, the power of positive thinking turns a potentially nasty situation into a good one?

X WINS CC