Ricky Hatton is brimming with confidence(good read)

[eagle]

He never said that PBF had no chance, he simply said that Hatton would definitely win. A bold statement, but the kind that keeps these forums going.

If you say that Hatton will definitely win, it means u are 100% sure that Hatton will win, that means he gives PBF 0% chance. Think about it.

[MRMANICK]

I'm not a big fan of Kevin Iole,Dan Rafael and a few of these other so called "experts" Doug Fischer is the man though"

The real experts in boxing are the fighters and lifelong fans. Many of those so-called media "experts" just go with the flow and steal off each other.

I personally think Mayweather is primed to get beat. I am just not sure if Hatton is the one to do it due to his size (I do hope it happens though). I think Cotto would bust Mayweather up terrible in the later rounds. Mosely would beat him also. Mayweather and De La Hoya, in their current form, signify what is bad about boxing right now. Both Hand select opponents and are afraid to actually take a chance against a large strong Welterweight/Jr. Middleweight.

This is Why Cotto and Mosely get my money, they are willing to go in there and risk everything. Kudo's to them.

Now see this is the kind of stuff Im tired of hearing. Cotto and Mosley get your money? so how many world betters have they fought lately. Well lets see Cotto has fought no one worth talking about but zab and that aint saying much. What big strong welter has cotto fought? who has cotto fought that floyd hasnt already beat or probably would beat. No one. Just a year ago everyone was saying cotto couldnt hang with floyd and what has changed in that year? Nothing. Cotto still fighting guys smaller than him with no punch. Hes fighting mosley now but i think you ge the point. i have nothing to say about shane even though he hasnt fought anyone worthy since winky. but his past gets him a pass. Say what u want but cotto loses to oscar by stoppage and to floyd by UD. Cotto is just too slow and his defense is lacking. There is a reason hes been fighting soft punchers.

[Wright]

I have done him a disservice by using the word 'definitely', but I still think he has a good point. Hatton will batter Mayweather, and then go on to beat Kostya. Oh.....hold on, he already has. Sorry for bringing that up.

[eagle]

I have done him a disservice by using the word 'definitely', but I still think he has a good point. Hatton will batter Mayweather, and then go on to beat Kostya. Oh.....hold on, he already has. Sorry for bringing that up.

I think there is a reason u have double the amount of sad clicks compared to cool clicks. PBF will beat Ricky and we will never see u on this site again.

[Wright]

I've always said that I think Floyd will beat Ricky, so I don't know why sad or good clicks should come in to it.

[eagle]

I have done him a disservice by using the word 'definitely', but I still think he has a good point. Hatton will batter Mayweather, and then go on to beat Kostya. Oh.....hold on, he already has. Sorry for bringing that up.

You just said Hatton will batter PBF.

I've always said that I think Floyd will beat Ricky, so I don't know why sad or good clicks should come in to it.

Now u say he wont and PBF will win?
You get sad clicks cos u talk shit.

[Wright]

Sarcasm?

[eagle]

Sarcasm?

Sarcasm? Where?

If some fanboy says Hatton will definitely beat PBF, he gives Floyd 0% chance, case closed.

[Wright]

I was talking about my own post with the 'sarcasm' thing. Then again, we've only given you two hundred years to catch up, so we should allow time for remedials.

[taansend]

VD - dissing Spicolis mom

Anyway, yeah, we say birds in the UK and men are blokes.

Getting back to the task at hand. I think Mayweather will win. Broken down in ten.

PBF wins 5 out of 10 by UD
PBF wins 3 out of 10 by TKO
Hatton wins 1 out of 10 by KO
Hatton wins 1 out of 10 by UD

Yeah, I know that yesterday I said I gave Hatton a 10% chance, well today it's 20%.

[eagle]

I was talking about my own post with the 'sarcasm' thing. Then again, we've only given you two hundred years to catch up, so we should allow time for remedials.

Look if u wanna do the whole Australia v UK debate, you will be defeated. You cannot argue that the UK is better than Oz no matter how hard u try.

[taansend]

I was talking about my own post with the 'sarcasm' thing. Then again, we've only given you two hundred years to catch up, so we should allow time for remedials.

Look if u wanna do the whole Australia v UK debate, you will be defeated. You cannot argue that the UK is better than Oz no matter how hard u try.

People!

If this person thinks Australia is a better country then he is right.

And if that person thinks the UK is a better country then he is right.

Home is where you want it to be. Both countries are great. Arguing about which is better just makes you both look like dicks. Seriously. Take this petty crap to the other board.

[superheavyrhun]

I was talking about my own post with the 'sarcasm' thing. Then again, we've only given you two hundred years to catch up, so we should allow time for remedials.

Look if u wanna do the whole Australia v UK debate, you will be defeated. You cannot argue that the UK is better than Oz no matter how hard u try.

People!

If this person thinks Australia is a better country then he is right.

And if that person thinks the UK is a better country then he is right.

Home is where you want it to be. Both countries are great. Arguing about which is better just makes you both look like dicks. Seriously. Take this petty crap to the other board.

So if I argue that Wales is the best nation in the world, am I right?

But seriously, do what taansend says and get a room if you want this argument.

[taansend]

I was talking about my own post with the 'sarcasm' thing. Then again, we've only given you two hundred years to catch up, so we should allow time for remedials.

Look if u wanna do the whole Australia v UK debate, you will be defeated. You cannot argue that the UK is better than Oz no matter how hard u try.

People!

If this person thinks Australia is a better country then he is right.

And if that person thinks the UK is a better country then he is right.

Home is where you want it to be. Both countries are great. Arguing about which is better just makes you both look like dicks. Seriously. Take this petty crap to the other board.

So if I argue that Wales is the best nation in the world, am I right?

But seriously, do what taansend says and get a room if you want this argument.

Yes. Wherever you think is best is best. I am so glad I'm from London, but I love living in California. I miss Fort Lauderdale but I am not going to stay in the USA for ever. For me, the next place is always the best place (fucking Gypo blood of mine ).

[Wright]

Not my point, as I have a better one - you wouldn't exist without us. In terms of Australia being better in terms of sporting achievement - boxing = no; football that counts = no (even though we are shit at the moment); rugby union = no; rugby league = we'll see; cricket = yes, no doubt; swimming = yes. As this is a boxing site, I was going to challenge you to name all of the top quality fighters in the world today that come from Ourstralia, but then I realised that you would be as scuppered as me with the UK, almost. Never mind, you live and learn.