My original comment was to express skepticism at politicians who define themselves by their promotion of family values. When you examine closely what they are saying, it's usually something more than just support of family, it ties in with other things. Support of family can mean different things to different people. You will be hard pressed to find a politician who does not support "family". They all do. But they don't all define themselves that way. Which is why I think it is usually bullshit for a politician to attempt to define or differentiate themselves as being pro-family.
Our discussion seems to have morphed into something bigger, which was not what I had wanted, but ok I'll take a shot at it.
We seem to differ a little in our definition of morality. Sure, when I vote I choose a party whose ideology matches mine. That doesn't mean the leader's moral or religious beliefs need to match mine, because typically those are things that do not have a big effect on my life.
OK, well I do differentiate between religious and political ideology. Politics shouldn't be about religion. It's a little thing called separation of church and state. As for morality, Pierre Trudeau, who was a very influential Canadian Prime Minister, once said "The state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation". I agree. I don't equate environmentalism with religion, concern for the environment should transcend religeous beliefs. Unfortunately environmental concerns do not seem to transcend political ideology, but that's a different story. You haven't given any examples of those you dismiss as tree huggers, so I won't comment, except to say that I would not be surprised if you see more tree-huggers than I do, but that's a different story.From your post I believe you are speaking specifically of issues like creationism, prayer in school, gay marriage, abortion etc closely tied to the religious right. I don't really differentiate between religious or political ideology. To me there is little difference between a bible thumping southern baptist or a tree hugging secular progressive. Only opposite ends of a irrational, ignorant and uncompromising coin.
Bookmarks