Re: Wacko's Round by Round of Roy Jones jr vs Tito Trinidad! Happy New Year bwoy

Originally Posted by
Hulk

Originally Posted by
wacko3205

Originally Posted by
Ice Cold Boxing

Originally Posted by
wacko3205

Originally Posted by
The Rookie Fan
Wacko's opening statements talking about how Tito has never beat a good boxer with a good fight plan is just silly. What the heck was he doing throughout his career and his 15 title defenses as a welterweight? Fighting stiffs who just stood there and said come on and hit me?
I find most people that put him down have only seen him fight sinse he fought DLH. Which means they hardley ever really saw him at his very best.
You think that statements silly huh?
Throughout Tito’s career he beat a lot of decent fighters…but not boxers. I’ve seen almost every Trinidad fight out there & I saw Tito when he was at his best…but his best weren’t shat when he faces boxers with a defense & game plan backed by a boxing mind.
Whitaker, Carr, & Campos were Trinidad’s most impressive wins to me…but beating Pernell was just cracking the shell of what he once was…so it’s hard to rate that one.
I never said that Tito sucked or that he didn’t beat good fighters in his rise…but there is a huge difference between beating a good fighter & a good boxer.
Rookie Fan or not…you know that.
Hector Camacho was a good boxer and Tito beat him comfortably and also ODLH. Even if you don't consider it a victory its still on the record books and it was a close fight that could of gone either way.
Camacho was a decent boxer...yes...& there are a few on Tito's list worth mentioning. Joppy is one that I like to credit Tito for utterly destroying...but I still don't buy into that Oscar win...not matter who tries to convince me of it.
That being said...bringing Camacho into it is all well & good...but once again...let me clarify...beating good fighters & a good boxer is different...or atleast in my eyes it is.
I just can;t believe that people try to over look the Hopkins, Wright, & even Oscar fights as Trinidad losing to overly accomplished boxers.
You feel me?
Camacho NOT a good boxer? Yeah, right wacko. Camacho was an AWESOME boxer. Is what you should be sayin is that he was old as hell by the time Tito fought him, which is the truth. But in his prime and even after it for a while, Hector "Macho" Camacho could box extremely well.
Once again...I need to understand this.
Why is it that when people question something that you say in a post...they're really questioning what you did'nt say at all.
NO WHERE DID I SAY THAT CAMACHO WAS NOT A GOOD BOXER.
I said he was decent...which he was...but he was far from being a challenge at the stage when he fought Trinidad.
Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!
Bookmarks