Re: Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
and Fenster
miron_lang that is a truly BRILLIANT post.
Impossible to argue against.
How can it possibly be a robbery if everyone is scoring rounds differently?
Great stuff.
miron's was not a truly BRILLIANT post. It is impossibly easy to argue against because the fact that people score rounds differently does nothing but confirm the unbiased objective way in which 5 people struggled to award Pacquiao any more than 5 rounds and 3 people gave him only 4 rounds and one person 3. Witnesses to a crime rarely describe the scene in exactly the same way but will often all describe the same offence and in this case it was a robbery.
For the millionth time - Judges score round by round. They have to hand in a score at the end of each and every round.
If the fans, that all scored it for Marquez, can't agree on precisely what rounds he won then how can it be a robbery? What have the judges done wrong? The rounds were clearly ambiguous!!! Unclear!!! Not obvious or definite!!!
For it to be a robbery everyone needs to agree on the majority of rounds. If you have people giving Pac all sorts of rounds then it's possible some people will have him winning the fight. And that includes the judges. Simple as. Marquez was just unlucky not to get the decision. That's it.
(brilliant post by miron_lang. Fact.)
Last edited by Fenster; 11-15-2011 at 10:14 AM.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks