Here are the evidence your honor...
Here are the evidence your honor...
Both feet off canvas?Sweet!
Case dismissed!
So you're only evidence is
"Well Barerra beat Hamed and Pacquiao beat Barerra so he is OBVIOUSLY better!!!"
great evidence like I've never heard of the man who beat the man logic beforeAnd it's like NEVER been proven wrong
Because boxing isnt about style its about who beats who.. its a basic A B and C science!!
And by this logic I can safely say that Mayorga could knock out Mosley in three rounds.. why? because Forrest did itAnd we saw what Mayorga did to him.. it makes perfect perfect sense!!!
I'm no stranger to sarcasm. You layed it on me pretty thick just like James Spader in "Tommy Boy" LOL!Originally Posted by Starr
You're good @ it, I tell you that.
Anyways, Like I said before, Barrera is the common opponent for both.
And style does make difference. But it's not just about style though, the pro-resume makes bigger difference.
If Naz fights Pac and apply the same tactics that he pulled on MAB, he will end up on stretcher on his way to hospital or even in the morgue (god forbid).
Naseem Hamed never really passed any true tests to remember.
He never came out of true gritty wars or showed his resolve like pac has.
Naz fought one elite fighter, got beaten, retired, and now he's someone's cellbitch.
Pac defeated future hall of famers and still kicking butt.
LOL! Pac aint no Mayorga.
Actually Mayorga is more like Naz, being arrogant and cocky that he is.
And where's Mayorga and Hamed now?...I guess they do have something in common.
I think Naz is still in prison with his cell master Tyrone :
http://blog.thesweetscience.com/2006.../#comment-3336
Don't drop the soap in the shower Naz!
![]()
WhatOriginally Posted by Pacstraightleft
a.) Learn to speak English
b.) Stop posting irrelevant pictures
c.) I could go and get pics of Pac getting knocked out by nobodies but it would mean nothing
josef4334 - I said Nasem always got off the floor to win and its true . I never said he beat Barrera . You just misinterpreted my post because you were seeing red at the time.
Look how washed out Barrera looked against Pac
I hate Naz i wanted to see him lose but thats not the point here Barrera fought on the backfoot using his jab not trading Pac would come forward and trade and that can be disaster against Naz forgetting the Barrera fight because Pac wouldn't be backing off and Naz has the power to turn out Pacs lights.Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Barrera completly changed his style for Naz fight had he fought coming forward like he normally did he would'nt have lasted to long Naz were'nt on his A game thats for sure
Naz was beat because he came forward against barrera. Anybody who comes forward against naz gets knocked out.
Pac would come forward with those wild rushes and get dropped fast.....
who has naz fought that is worth mentioning in the like of barerra? barerra has the least power among the top four featherweight and he dropped hamed. you make it seem like hamed is unhittable.. i doubt that naz would even showboat against pac.. he wont have time to do thatOriginally Posted by Salhadin
"speed is the essence of war"
sun tzu-art of war
Barrera did'nt drop Naz
Barrera does not have the least power and he did not floor NasOriginally Posted by josef4334
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks