Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 97

Thread: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    968
    Cool Clicks

    Default Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Manny "Pacman" Pacquaio has greatly divided the boxing community into different factions. Those for him and against him. Many of those fans in his camp think he's the greatest thing since slice bread. And then there are those fans that just don't like him for whatever reason.

    This is a serious question because of many boxing fans have called Manny Pacquiao a pussy and coward for wanting to fight Cotto at a catchweight, which would be his first. To be fair I never considered the Oscar fight a catchweight because you can't expect someone to jump 3 weight classes from 135 to fight you when you called him out and it was at the 147 ww limit. So there are endless discussions about the Pacman for or against him in every boxing forum.

    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1079
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Manny "Pacman" Pacquaio has greatly divided the boxing community into different factions. Those for him and against him. Many of those fans in his camp think he's the greatest thing since slice bread. And then there are those fans that just don't like him for whatever reason.

    This is a serious question because of many boxing fans have called Manny Pacquiao a pussy and coward for wanting to fight Cotto at a catchweight, which would be his first. To be fair I never considered the Oscar fight a catchweight because you can't expect someone to jump 3 weight classes from 135 to fight you when you called him out and it was at the 147 ww limit. So there are endless discussions about the Pacman for or against him in every boxing forum.

    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.
    NO

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    11,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2421
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Always going to be fans and haters of a fighter. I started liking Pac after the Diaz and De La Hoya fights; never disliked him but wasn't pleased JMM lost twice to him; so I'm not really a fanboy.

    Personally I can't help but think he is an absolute asset to the game. When he climbs through those ropes that is one serious dude and is worth paying $$$ to watch{which is saying something} This 143 Cotto thing is f#cked tbh, but isn't it his promoter really who's trying to do this? And if Cotto and his charge take the fight just for the $$$ at a detrimental weight, then maybe they are bad for boxing. I can think of alot worse for boxing than Manny imo.
    Hidden Content

    Marching Towards the Abyss...............

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1386
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    I think his fans are worse for the sport than he is. What I dont like about Manny is his need to make his opponents boil down to a weight where they will be ineffective.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1079
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by LEGION View Post
    Always going to be fans and haters of a fighter. I started liking Pac after the Diaz and De La Hoya fights; never disliked him but wasn't pleased JMM lost twice to him; so I'm not really a fanboy.

    Personally I can't help but think he is an absolute asset to the game. When he climbs through those ropes that is one serious dude and is worth paying $$$ to watch{which is saying something} This 143 Cotto thing is f#cked tbh, but isn't it his promoter really who's trying to do this? And if Cotto and his charge take the fight just for the $$$ at a detrimental weight, then maybe they are bad for boxing. I can think of alot worse for boxing than Manny imo.
    well said mate

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    "Is Manny bad for boxing?" Lmfao! If he is then Mayweather is 10x worse.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Was New York, Cali most recently to present
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    942
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Wasn't there a section just for Manny for people to post??

    The nuthuggers and haters are both equally annoying

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2548
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Meh, the 143 thing is not even close to confirmed. Otherwise yes clearly he's been bad for boxing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4363
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by markb018 View Post
    Wasn't there a section just for Manny for people to post??

    The nuthuggers and haters are both equally annoying
    He's the most popular fighter in the sport, it does nothing good for the forum to have reasonable threads focused on Pacquiao shut away in some board no one wants to read (which also no longer exists). If you don't like it, don't read the threads.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4168
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by markb018 View Post
    Wasn't there a section just for Manny for people to post??

    The nuthuggers and haters are both equally annoying
    It wasnt just a section it was a nut net!
    A few nut huggers got tangled up in it. So it got rolled up and piffed overboard .
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by markb018 View Post
    Wasn't there a section just for Manny for people to post??

    The nuthuggers and haters are both equally annoying
    Word.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3468
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by LEGION View Post
    Always going to be fans and haters of a fighter. I started liking Pac after the Diaz and De La Hoya fights; never disliked him but wasn't pleased JMM lost twice to him; so I'm not really a fanboy.

    Personally I can't help but think he is an absolute asset to the game. When he climbs through those ropes that is one serious dude and is worth paying $$$ to watch{which is saying something} This 143 Cotto thing is f#cked tbh, but isn't it his promoter really who's trying to do this? And if Cotto and his charge take the fight just for the $$$ at a detrimental weight, then maybe they are bad for boxing. I can think of alot worse for boxing than Manny imo.

    Very much agreed on all points....

    The guy is worth every dollar to see him in action, he goes all out in the ring, he is willing to fight anyone...

    As for the catchweights I am not a big fan of them and wish they would not happen but as long as no title is involved and the fights are worth the price of a ticket then why not I guess...

    People have to realize that Manny is a 135lb fighter that everyone is coming to him for the bouts he is not seeking them out....Why step into the lions den and allow bigger disadvantages?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1386
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by LEGION View Post
    Always going to be fans and haters of a fighter. I started liking Pac after the Diaz and De La Hoya fights; never disliked him but wasn't pleased JMM lost twice to him; so I'm not really a fanboy.

    Personally I can't help but think he is an absolute asset to the game. When he climbs through those ropes that is one serious dude and is worth paying $$$ to watch{which is saying something} This 143 Cotto thing is f#cked tbh, but isn't it his promoter really who's trying to do this? And if Cotto and his charge take the fight just for the $$$ at a detrimental weight, then maybe they are bad for boxing. I can think of alot worse for boxing than Manny imo.

    Very much agreed on all points....

    The guy is worth every dollar to see him in action, he goes all out in the ring, he is willing to fight anyone...

    As for the catchweights I am not a big fan of them and wish they would not happen but as long as no title is involved and the fights are worth the price of a ticket then why not I guess...

    People have to realize that Manny is a 135lb fighter that everyone is coming to him for the bouts he is not seeking them out....Why step into the lions den and allow bigger disadvantages?
    cuz thats what all the greats in history have done

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3468
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by LEGION View Post
    Always going to be fans and haters of a fighter. I started liking Pac after the Diaz and De La Hoya fights; never disliked him but wasn't pleased JMM lost twice to him; so I'm not really a fanboy.

    Personally I can't help but think he is an absolute asset to the game. When he climbs through those ropes that is one serious dude and is worth paying $$$ to watch{which is saying something} This 143 Cotto thing is f#cked tbh, but isn't it his promoter really who's trying to do this? And if Cotto and his charge take the fight just for the $$$ at a detrimental weight, then maybe they are bad for boxing. I can think of alot worse for boxing than Manny imo.

    Very much agreed on all points....

    The guy is worth every dollar to see him in action, he goes all out in the ring, he is willing to fight anyone...

    As for the catchweights I am not a big fan of them and wish they would not happen but as long as no title is involved and the fights are worth the price of a ticket then why not I guess...

    People have to realize that Manny is a 135lb fighter that everyone is coming to him for the bouts he is not seeking them out....Why step into the lions den and allow bigger disadvantages?
    cuz thats what all the greats in history have done
    Who? Who are these greats? Armstrong?, Jones? please inform us...

    Who else has gone from 106lbs to fight at 142lbs?

    Who else has titles in 5 weight classes at the moment and as many lineial titles? Who has claimed as many ring titles?

    even if they have done one of the above who else has done all of the above?

    The man has done his job and well he has nothing to prove by fighting under everyone elses terms

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    He can't prove anymore... the leap up to true Welter would likely be a step to far for him... and he knows it.

    So you right... he doesn't want to prove anything... just make some money by fighting the sports biggest names... if they were all at 135-140 then he wouldn't be asking for catchweights or talking about Welterweight.

    He's in his twilight and just look to earn money, ala Floyd Mayweather.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 08:14 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-02-2008, 05:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing