I am a fan of boxing. Boxing can mean a brawl or a boxing clinic. Both appeal to me. It is not Tysons fault that a sports show says that "in order for a boxing match to be a classic there has to be blood and bruised eyes"! That is the fault of a dumb and illinformed network. Tyson has nothing to do with that.Originally Posted by Punisher136
I'm saying that there's people who were only interested in brutal style fights because of tyson. WE can see the skill that tyson had, but some people who were drawn to the sport by tyson only saw him for his power and knockouts. Some of the boxing fans that have defected for other more "entertaining" sports are these people. I'm not saying tyson is the only person to ever have an intense physical fighting style. I would rather see a classic battle between two fighters but I see the skill involved behind that. There are others who only see it as all out punching with no technique. De la Hoya mayweather is bashed for 1 reason more than any other. Not because they were over paid. Not because it was the technical display that every true boxing fan expected but because there wasn't enough brutallity. I have heard on more than one main stream sports show that in order for a boxing match to be classic there has to be blood and bruised eyes. Thats tyson's fault.Originally Posted by miles
What does Tyson have to do with Oscar/ Floyd?? Tyson brought energy and excitement and lived up to his billing. Floyd and Oscar fought an interesting but predictable technical fight. Therein is the difference. Floyd against Oscar wasnt exciting. But since the prime of Tyson we have had any number of exciting bouts. How about Barrera: Morales? Gatti: Ward? Which do you prefer? Floyd against Oscar or other classic fights which have indeed happened since prime Tyson left the planet.Originally Posted by Punisher136
He got the wrong people interested in boxing. Most of his fights were short and brutal. Everyone that was solely a tyson fan just wanted to see a knock out. In fact i blame tyson for a lot of things that went arye with boxing in the late 80's early 90's. People who were solely fans of tyson didn't wanna see fights that were technical clinics that the dedicated fan would enjoy, they wanted to see unskilled (not saying tyson is unskilled because thats far from the truth but im saying in relation to other fights not involving tyson) anybodies just throw punch after punch with no emphasis on defense (again tyson had a great defense but this isn't about his fights) going for knockouts. Without tyson, More people would've viewed the PBF/ De la Hoya fight in a more positive light.Originally Posted by miles
Tyson revisionism is something that has taken hold in last last few years since the Lewis loss and the McBride and Williams debacles....More and more so these revisionists are creeping out.
Look back to the '80's and the excitement and thrill of Tyson unifying the belts and with a style that excited ALL. He got people interested in boxing in a way that hadnt been so since the '70's. He did it with flair and power to dazzle and at such a young age.
Tyson was young and had demons and in due course let those skills waste away. He then got incarcerated for 3 years and came back in a rush and underprepared. The slide was apparent even a decade ago. The Tyson that lost to Holyfield was not the same Tyson that had reawakened the sport.
The Tyson of those few years (1986-198had a style, confidence and swagger that ANYONE in the history of boxing would have issues with. Mike was special, but Mike allowed his flaws and weaknesses to eventually take hold.
That peak period Tyson would be a handful for anybody in the history of boxing no doubt...and that is why he deserves his respect...
There are great fights throughout the divisions...Tyson is not connected to Oscar: PBF in any way...
I dont see what you are saying...
It is silly that you can "blame" modern boxing on Tyson when actually there is so much good boxing around you!!!
Bookmarks