Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 168

Thread: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,613
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    960
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    The 70's when most people didn't really understand how dangerous boxing was to one's health. Just seeing what it's done to Ali, has been enough to keep many of the best athletes from pursuing a career in boxing. The risk reward is just too much. And then there are other factors were boxers are still exploited. Today, when we see a gifted athlete, he dominates.
    Muhammad Ali was unique in that he TRIED to get hit with punches. He never developed any reflexes and merely won (if you can call it that) by outstaminising his opponents!

    Hardly any other boxers become so brain damaged as that today because they actively TRY NOT to get hit!
    8
    Perhaps we can thank Ali for the motivation for modern boxers to develop a defence!
    Where did you get so enlightened an Ali's strategy in the ring? Do you mean the rope a dope? I have no idea what you mean when you say Ali never developed reflexes and just won? Can you elaborate so I might be more enlightened.
    This is my analysis of Muhammad Ali...

    I consider 2 versions..

    Muhammad Ali I: Was very fast of hand and feet, was also longer than most of his opponents. He had, as always, great stamina. This Ali was CHINNY (and obviously looked it).

    This Clay/Ali performed a "merry-go-round" of his opponents where he was always out of range so his opponents couldn't hit him. But most of the time he couldn't hit his opponents either. He darted in to land his own shots and then get immediately out of range. He avoided much punishment in his first career this way, because he speed, allied to his length advantage enabled him to play tag.

    However, you can already see that this Clay/Ali, when he remained for anytime in punching range of his opponents, was hit even by the SLOWEST of punches! Break out the old black and whites and have a good look again, but this time with a critical eye and forget about all the myths you've been fed.

    Clay was decked by 185lb Cooper a straight up light HW and a straight up BUM (see record). No HW boxer today would ever be decked (and basically KOed) by a guy like that!

    Muhammad Ali II: This Ali was strong for the era, he had a harder chin, even an iron chin for the criteria of the day. And he had great stamina as always. This Ali was still one of the tallest boxers but was no longer particularly tall. And this Ali had lost his foot speed and most of his handspeed. He had become a slow, plodding overweight. His new tactic was basically landing some wind maker shots and then wrestling and fouling.

    Because he no longer had his speed, the truth about Ali's reflexes was totally exposed, he had none! Because earlier, he never had any need to develop any!

    What followed is probably one of the most disgraceful careers recorded. Being smashed from pillar to post in nearly all of his fights.

    I hope I was thorough enough.
    You're joking...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,985
    Mentioned
    1683 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3033
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    I wish he was joking but he is deadly serious.

    Even though a old Lennox smashed Vitali and cause that huge cut he still thinks the Klits can dominate the 90's.

    Beyond idiotic.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    577
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I wish he was joking but he is deadly serious.

    Even though a old Lennox smashed Vitali and cause that huge cut he still thinks the Klits can dominate the 90's.

    Beyond idiotic.
    But Lennox did not smash Vitali.

    He managed to open him up with swiping shots (because Vitali had him constantly off balance). The chances of Lennox ever managing to repeat that fortunate outcome were little to none.

    Despite the cuts, Vitali delivered a flogging to Lennox, as witnessed by the entire crowd who cheered for Vitali and booed Lennox. As witnessed by the entire HBO crew who agreed there had to be a rematch. As forced upon Lennox by Merchant. As obviated by Lennox who retired after witnessing the subsequent destruction of Kirk Johnson in 2 rounds.

    If ever there was a fight a fighter LOST in yet proved he was better, this was the fight!

    And I AGREE that the fight had to be stopped mind you. Lennox DID get the win. I don't see how VK could have finished the fight.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    577
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    You're joking...
    Either you haven't SEEN Muhammad's fights, or you've never bothered to properly analyse them.

    Farcial events occurred in Ali's fights from the start of career, right through to the end, I can make an entire list of occurances for you to check if you like.

    And I almost forgot..

    One of the reasons Muhammad was such a champ in the 60's/70's was because we OUTWEIGHED 70% of his opponents (and Foreman a whopping 90%!)

    With a median opponent weight of 200lbs flat, that is pathetic when viewed against the modern eras!

    As far as HW boxing goes, the fun started with Mike Tyson and continues to this very day.

    All previous eras are basically unwatchable except for educational purposes.

    Don't get me wrong, I can APPRECIATE those times boxing. But I'd never make an outrageous claim like that was BETTER!

    Take away Ali's, height and weight advantage, paint him white, and you basically have JERRY QUARRY! Fact! They were stylistically similar!
    Last edited by Max Power; 12-14-2014 at 04:29 PM.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,985
    Mentioned
    1683 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3033
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Max - Lennox was old and at the end of his career and he still beat Vitali. A peak Lennox would destroy him. Get over it.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    577
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Max - Lennox was old and at the end of his career and he still beat Vitali. A peak Lennox would destroy him. Get over it.
    Possibly so. I wont fight you on that any further, suffice to say this is how I see it..

    A PRE-PRIME Vitali, lost (under unusual circumstances) to a NEAR-PRIME Lennox!

    The very best Lennox was only a year and a half prior, vs Rahman II imo.

    Vitali continued to get better and better for many years after.

    Basically I see Vitali lost to one of the HEAVIEST and THE MOST EXPERIENCED version of Lewis there ever was!

    In fact I think there is good chances that if a lighter and more athletic version of Lewis was in that fight, he would have been stopped in 2 rounds by Vitali.

    I don't really know who was the better boxer because there are no landslide stats here for me to pull out my ass, but I suspect Vits was overall maybe just a bit better.

    Just my opinion and I note, entirely subjective this time round.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,985
    Mentioned
    1683 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3033
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    This is where you make the mistake. Heavier is not better. Lennox was not at his best weight which would have been lighter.

    Vitali did not improve technically that much. He always had that robotic style and like any good big brother had to bail out his younger brother when in trouble.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    577
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    This is where you make the mistake. Heavier is not better. Lennox was not at his best weight which would have been lighter.

    Vitali did not improve technically that much. He always had that robotic style and like any good big brother had to bail out his younger brother when in trouble.
    That last part about bailing out little brother, even if it were true, does not make Vitali's case any worse here.

    Being out of shape is a disadvantage.

    Being heavier is an advantage.

    Of course, they often do (and in this case I agree probably did go hand in hand).

    So although Lennox might have been a little slower and had a little less stamina, he theoretically would have been able to sap the stamina of VK quicker through weight. He might have had a little more thud on his punches, he DEFINITELY could take a better punch with it. So while some attributes may be worse, some may benefit.

    First thing to consider is that Lennox was only 5 bloody lbs over his optimum weight! On a 250lb man this is jack shit! So REALLY we are discussing something extremely petty anyway. Lennox claimed he was in great shape and he did not look anything so soft to me which would have made any real difference to his speed and stamina.

    And then I turn to the fight. Lennox was just as fast as he always was at his high 240's anyway.

    I will give you that he DID seem to gas earlier than usual, but then again, in all his 43 previous fights he never had another 250lb man pushing the pace on him and smacking him around like a piniata either!

    38 years old is not old at all for a modern professional HW boxer, especially with Lewis's style so let's not try to pretend he was too old either! Neither is a 1 year lay off a hinderence these days in a prepared boxer.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,985
    Mentioned
    1683 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3033
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    All your last post in nonsense. It was obvious Lennox was not in prime condition and that was clear to see. Being heavier was therefore a disadvantage for him.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1300
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What Era had the Most Talented HeavyWeights?

    Muhammad Ali had fast hands and was the greatest HW of all time, I don't see what more can be said about him.
    David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 11-07-2009, 05:48 PM
  2. Tributes to a talented amateur boxer!
    By yvonne in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2008, 08:43 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-07-2007, 01:43 PM
  4. Who is the most talented boxer of all time?
    By cockey cockney in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 12:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing