Originally Posted by
Beanz
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
@
Fenster @
smashup
I think the both of you live in London or have lived in London. What are your honest takes on the city today? How do you feel about life there? About the changes? The pros? The cons? All of that.
It's unrecognisable. When I was a kid I remember when certain areas became predominantly "black," it looked really strange, now those areas are predominantly East European or Asian/Muslim, and the black people have filtered to the suburbs.
I said a few years ago, after spending about ten years hiding, I was shocked at spending all day and night in A&E. Hundreds after hundreds of people and no English/Brits. Get on a bus, no English. Entire high streets full of shops, no English/Brits.
Not saying it's a bad thing. Just bizarre.
I don't think people should be scared of discussing why groups of the "same" people live together. Trevor Phillips - of all people - said multiculturalism hasn't worked.
It's why I can't stand JK, Billy, Lily and Dom calling everyone evil racists whilst sitting in their 100% white areas. Why do they CHOOSE to live in those areas? Why?
Why do muslims live together? Africans? Poles? Romanians? Chinese?
So Cleese was pretty much correct in his views and opinions?
Statistically he is correct, Khan has largely agreed too, and then we have on the ground proof with the words of Fenster and perhaps Smashup to come.
Case seems to have been solved.
Where are all these cases of people being called 'evil racists'?
The opposite is closer to the truth. Basically Gandalf is acting like some ministry of public enlightenment totalitarian cunt insisting that there is the far right sanctioned truth and any other opinion is banned.
Has Cleese ever even lived in London?
You call people sick, racist fucks all the time. Don't you remember? Doesn't matter if they are using dark humor or facts, but racism is your middle name.
BTW, how is berating somebody for baldness which they cannot control any different to berating somebody for their skin color?
Is it a freedom of speech thing?
Why are you obsessed with everyone being victims? It's pathetic. If you really don't think you are a racist then all is dandy.
Calling someone a sick fuck is another thing entirely. If you are going to post sick poems and stories it's nobodies elses fault if you are called out on it.
And now you are policing the use of the word 'bald'?
Yet you think it's fine to rip the piss out of someone for having no legs? A lanky twat like you could probably spare a few inches to help them out too. Giraffdalf.
It is a genuine question. One cannot help being gay or bald or black, yet you would happily berate the bald person. I am just curious how that works out from a logical point of view. You look for the weakest point and strike like a viper, but because I suspect that is not part of the ist or ism buzzword list, then that is fine and what you consider freedom of speech and I would agree to an extent. That is my interpretation of it. You basically think some people deserve to be abused and this was way back way before it even ended up the way it did over stream of conscious poems and others have put up with it too.
You can bring up stories and poems, but none of it can be backed up as action and yet you still made a truce with the man. It is very peculiar. You made a truce with a man that you think is mentally ill, who you think wants to bomb refugees, is a pervert, and who you mocked for being bald. I am just saying that it is rather inconsistent.
However, that is totally besides the point and you did not answer the question as to why years and years ago you would berate a person for a natural situation that they have no control over. A woman can choose to get pregnant to a bad man. A person can choose to rape another person. A man can choose to run in front of a train as an illegal immigrant. All those things are valid points one can contend with as they are choices, but to berate a man for being bald. How is that different?
You say Lyle does not understand freedom of speech, but you go on and on like a broken record about racism too. 'This site is non-racist'. Sexist, homophobic, racist blah, blah, blah, year in year out until everyone has had it up to the eyeballs. Yet you call people cunts, mock their appearance and all kinds of twisted things. You have double standards.
And once again, you are a lone voice in a thread.
Bookmarks