I aint a floyd fan but fuck this guy can box. Hes like roy jones a lower weight, he makes guys look stupid and these guys arent just bums....they are world class. If continues surely he will become an all time great, what do you reckon?
I aint a floyd fan but fuck this guy can box. Hes like roy jones a lower weight, he makes guys look stupid and these guys arent just bums....they are world class. If continues surely he will become an all time great, what do you reckon?
This thread happens every week
I know.....but i havent done one yet so i wanted toOriginally Posted by Taeth
The answer is yes he can become an alltime great if he steps up his competition or dominates successive weight divisions in a way similar to Roy JOnes Jr., but the difference is despite what people say Roy Jones Jr. fought much better competition than Floyd Mayweather Jr. and probably everyone in the 90's except Holyfield.
He will. Even with a loss or two. A loss will bring him back to earth, and get him hungry. And, it would force him to fight the"tough guys", everyone wants him to fight, to set back up the biggest money fights.
If he keeps winning without a loss, he definately becomes an all-time great.
At this rate, he'll end up being remembered for ducking fighters, fighting paper champs at 140+ and having a big mouth. Erm, that's about it really.
Remember the good old days, we miss you Marco!
Floyd Mayweather is on his way.
If he was to beat Zab, then Oscar, then either Hatton or Margarito, you wouldn't consider him an all-time great? Or even if he lost to Zab, and while Zab was fighting Oscar, Floyd beats Margarito, then Hatton, then rematches Zab, he still wouldn't be great? This is the plan he and Arum have come up with, and if he sticks to it{Big if}, I can't see how you could doubt him.Originally Posted by yoitsdan
If PBF beats all those people, then he goes down much higher than Roy Jones Jr. He would have beaten better people.Originally Posted by Unknowndonor
Yes i definatly will consider him an all time great if he does that. I doubt him cos I don't think it's gonna go like that. If oscar doesn't beat him hatton will, but if it goes like u said then he will be an all time great for sure. His achievement at 130-135 cannot be questioned though.Originally Posted by Unknowndonor
Remember the good old days, we miss you Marco!
He still is hungry though, and he does want the big fights just on his terms...Originally Posted by Unknowndonor
I like Floyd, and a fight with Oscar will make alot of money, and even though Oscar is old, he still is a credible fighter, but I'd rather see him fight Margarito 1st. Then he secures that he beat 2 of the top 5 WWs, before taking the money fight.Originally Posted by yoitsdan
I totally agree with him skipping 140{Hatton}, but I don't blame him completely. Some of that blame should go to Arum. Having Cotto at 140 being groomed for a big fight, but not being ready for Floyd, puts 2 of your horses in the same race, and all the attention goes to Floyd. Cotto doesn't get the big fights, which equalls less money and exposure for Arum. 2 undefeated fighters in 2 weight classes makes more sense. Especially if both can run the tables and then face each other in a mega-fight. As you can tell by the interview with Floyd, he loves Arum, and is going to do what he is told.
It's interesting to read what the perception of Floyd was 5 years ago.
Regardless of how Mayweather Jr. finishes his career, i'm sure some fans will think of him as an all-time great, but as far as i'm concerned he'll be remembered as someone who never really lived up to their potential.
I find myself thinking that more and more. He has for whatever reason severly hand cuffed his own career whenever he hits a nice creast. Like a guy in an auto race who mazes 200mph outta the gate then takes foot off gas, see division and other just passing by. He 'settles'...in career and in more then a few fights. Hey he did beat a great in JMM, even if he looked like he outweighed him by one Ricardo Lopez.
Personally I think his ability is great. But as for one career defining unique statement of a match, don't see it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks