P4pking, I'm not saying you're dumb, I'm not saying you're ignorant, I'm just saying there's evidence of things that are specifically NOT SCIENCE being passed off as science.
Please look this over and see if you think it's kosher
"Subject: Re: Energy infrastructure fact sheet & KXL oped
Recirculating both the fact sheet and op-ed reflecting edits and comments from Jake, Nikki, and Joel. In answer to research:
changed 20 to 40, and Trevor can provide calculations based on EIA data, if reporters need it, on the Mexico/Canada trade point. It isn't written up neatly in one place online, unfortunately. Joel,
we pumped up the climate impacts but in discussing with Jake decided we do still need to address why she's making her position known, when she has previously said she will wait for the President to make a decision. Added a line about wanting to let voters know where she stands, and added a more expansive graf about making the US the leader in fighting climate change and becoming a clean energy superpower. Nipped and tucked elsewhere to keep the word count down. Knowing we are still working out rollout timing - comms, policy, political, do you clear these to go forward to the book? Thanks all."
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8440
That look on the level to you? Does that come across as science which is interested in factual evidence or does that come across as politicians rigging the system?
And bcollins coming back and attacking my post about the article "Should We Be Having Kids In The Age of Climate Change?" is bush league....I'm poking fun of the hubris shown by the media...."Should We Be Having Kids?"....who the absolute FUCK is the government or the media to tell ME or anyone else what they should or should not be doing in regards to having kids? And bcollins wants to defend that
Yes that is total clown shoes crazy, but hey I'm the one who is off my rocker, I'm the one making a bigger deal over things like that....
does bcollins have kids? Does bcollins believe that other people should be able to have families?
If he has no problem with others having families then why pick that post out of all the others to harp on?
I pick on the "science" when I see shit like "we pumped up the climate impacts" or like the emails from East Anglia where it clearly showed scientists fudging the data. Other times and MOST time I pick on the "journalists" who are driving a media narrative for politicians who simply want more power....and if bcollins took the time to read he might understand that, but he doesn't. He takes personal offense to me questioning those things...and the fucking sad part is, IF bcollins is indeed working with scientists and he doesn't care about the bullshit peddled by the media and politicians (and either he knows it's bullshit and doesn't care, or he's in too deep to see it for what it is) then he's a part of the problem not a part of the solution and it casts a shadow over any scientific work he might be a part of.
Bookmarks