Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 51

Thread: In defense of Maidana/PBF

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    LouEVIL, Kentucky "birthplace of Cassius Clay"
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    873
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    People have already written this fight off and accused Mayweather of being a pussy for choosing Maidana (which is the same thing people said when Broner chose to fight Maidana, so how Maidana became known as a pushover is beyond me).

    Like everyone else, I would rather PBF/Bradley or PBF/Pac. But with them out of the picture, who else is there? Everyone else at WW is either underdeveloped with no name value yet, or guys that Floyd has already beat handily.

    Then people say "well why doesn't he fight a 154lber?" Well, which 154lb guy would you want him to fight? Lara? He's a good fighter but he has no name value. Molina? Mundine? Ishe Smith? Bundrage? Martiroysan? Kirkland? Who of those guys has the momentum and name value to warrant a PBF megafight? 154 is a largely ignored division, lost in between WW and MW. Floyd has already beat the only two names at 154 (Cotto and Canelo).

    Then there are the people who say he should have picked Khan. Why? On the grounds that Khan beat Maidana (VERY narrowly) 4 years ago? Who gives a fuck? Since when do you earn shit now based on what you did 4 years ago? Boxing is a "what have you done lately" sport: Maidana has racked up a solid win streak at WW and is coming off a huge upset over one of boxing's most promising prospects. Khan is coming off a shit performance against Diaz where he BARELY won against a subpar opponent, and Khan has never even fought at WW before. I agree that Khan's style makes an interesting challenge for Mayweather, but it just doesn't make sense to make that fight.

    I think Maidana is interesting for a number of reasons. I don't expect him to win, but I do expect him to make it interesting.

    Maidana is very unorthodox in his punching and throws bombs from crazy angles. He's also very tricky and resourceful with his power punching: he's very good at getting his fists on his opponents chin and body from any range or angle. I think he has the ability to get Floyd out of his comfort zone and make this a fight.


    well said!!! i dunno why everyone disses maidana either. its bullshit. this guy is a warrior. and in my opinion, he did beat khan, battered him all over the ring!!! maidana is all about weird angles so he does have a chance. and he can hit hard!!! im american, but i want maidana to win!!! not sure he will, but here's to hoping, and i know at least he'll try like a MF!!! unlike many chumps just out to get a payday.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    19,539
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1839
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by #1FightFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    People have already written this fight off and accused Mayweather of being a pussy for choosing Maidana (which is the same thing people said when Broner chose to fight Maidana, so how Maidana became known as a pushover is beyond me).

    Like everyone else, I would rather PBF/Bradley or PBF/Pac. But with them out of the picture, who else is there? Everyone else at WW is either underdeveloped with no name value yet, or guys that Floyd has already beat handily.

    Then people say "well why doesn't he fight a 154lber?" Well, which 154lb guy would you want him to fight? Lara? He's a good fighter but he has no name value. Molina? Mundine? Ishe Smith? Bundrage? Martiroysan? Kirkland? Who of those guys has the momentum and name value to warrant a PBF megafight? 154 is a largely ignored division, lost in between WW and MW. Floyd has already beat the only two names at 154 (Cotto and Canelo).

    Then there are the people who say he should have picked Khan. Why? On the grounds that Khan beat Maidana (VERY narrowly) 4 years ago? Who gives a fuck? Since when do you earn shit now based on what you did 4 years ago? Boxing is a "what have you done lately" sport: Maidana has racked up a solid win streak at WW and is coming off a huge upset over one of boxing's most promising prospects. Khan is coming off a shit performance against Diaz where he BARELY won against a subpar opponent, and Khan has never even fought at WW before. I agree that Khan's style makes an interesting challenge for Mayweather, but it just doesn't make sense to make that fight.

    I think Maidana is interesting for a number of reasons. I don't expect him to win, but I do expect him to make it interesting.

    Maidana is very unorthodox in his punching and throws bombs from crazy angles. He's also very tricky and resourceful with his power punching: he's very good at getting his fists on his opponents chin and body from any range or angle. I think he has the ability to get Floyd out of his comfort zone and make this a fight.


    well said!!! i dunno why everyone disses maidana either. its bullshit. this guy is a warrior. and in my opinion, he did beat khan, battered him all over the ring!!! maidana is all about weird angles so he does have a chance. and he can hit hard!!! im american, but i want maidana to win!!! not sure he will, but here's to hoping, and i know at least he'll try like a MF!!! unlike many chumps just out to get a payday.




    Have actually you seen the Khan v Maidana fight or just the youtube highlights?

    The one where Khan floored him early and pretty much schooled him every tround until he got caught in the 10th and did very well to survive but then still fired back in the 11th and 12th.

    The fact is Khan beat him fair and square and pretty comprehensively in the boxing worlds eyes and unanimously in the 3 judges eyes

    One of my favourite fights in the last 5 years.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    662
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    It took Maidana 10 rounds to land on Khan. He went 50-50 with an ancient bloated Morales. Got totally schooled by Alexander.

    He qualified for this fight because he "proved" himself at 147 by beating Adrien Broner, whose only win at 147 is Paulie Malignaggi, which he scraped through.

    I love Maidana but this is a shit mismatch. He wont land a punch. Round one to twelve rinse and repeat.
    Exactly how I see it. Don't know why or how people can see this as anyway competitive. Perhaps people believed in Broners hype and that his style is similar to Floyd's? They are completely different. Floyd will make Maidana look stupid just like he did against Canelo. Do people not understand that to have some sort of a chance against Floyd u need some sort of speed. 120-108 on all cards is my prediction.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    662
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    If prefer khan v Maidana 2 then either v Floyd

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    933
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    People have already written this fight off and accused Mayweather of being a pussy for choosing Maidana (which is the same thing people said when Broner chose to fight Maidana, so how Maidana became known as a pushover is beyond me).

    Like everyone else, I would rather PBF/Bradley or PBF/Pac. But with them out of the picture, who else is there? Everyone else at WW is either underdeveloped with no name value yet, or guys that Floyd has already beat handily.

    Then people say "well why doesn't he fight a 154lber?" Well, which 154lb guy would you want him to fight? Lara? He's a good fighter but he has no name value. Molina? Mundine? Ishe Smith? Bundrage? Martiroysan? Kirkland? Who of those guys has the momentum and name value to warrant a PBF megafight? 154 is a largely ignored division, lost in between WW and MW. Floyd has already beat the only two names at 154 (Cotto and Canelo).

    Then there are the people who say he should have picked Khan. Why? On the grounds that Khan beat Maidana (VERY narrowly) 4 years ago? Who gives a fuck? Since when do you earn shit now based on what you did 4 years ago? Boxing is a "what have you done lately" sport: Maidana has racked up a solid win streak at WW and is coming off a huge upset over one of boxing's most promising prospects. Khan is coming off a shit performance against Diaz where he BARELY won against a subpar opponent, and Khan has never even fought at WW before. I agree that Khan's style makes an interesting challenge for Mayweather, but it just doesn't make sense to make that fight.

    I think Maidana is interesting for a number of reasons. I don't expect him to win, but I do expect him to make it interesting.

    Maidana is very unorthodox in his punching and throws bombs from crazy angles. He's also very tricky and resourceful with his power punching: he's very good at getting his fists on his opponents chin and body from any range or angle. I think he has the ability to get Floyd out of his comfort zone and make this a fight.
    Solid, solid post. Guilty as charged. I also thought Broner would carve Maidana up. Right away when a guy see's Maidana vs Floyd on the docket he thinks oh great more of the same. Floyd gets 40 million dollars to fight a style perfectly suited for his. We've all become a bunch of chronic complainers. No matter what the fight these days it seems one or the other combatants are dismissed
    as not worthy for one reason or the other. Its silly to think that either man is "not worthy" on a fundamental pugilistic level. All of those we talk about daily here and at other places along with those we routinely dismiss are all elite fighters at this level. I think sometimes we all forget that from the comforts of our offices and living rooms.

    Ftr I thought and still do believe that Khan is a tougher fight technically then Maidana but that's contingent on getting through the first six w/o a vapour lock and extending it if possible over twelve.
    Conversely Maidana is far more dangerous over the first six because he has no shot at solving the Mayvinci code and he knows it. Mayweather does not like fast starts and there is another aspect of this under the radar and that's Mayweathers feelings about Broner. He actually does kind of view him as his little brother. I think there is some emotional investment in this fight for Floyd and that could actually present itself with a mistake. A mistake that gets him caught and in trouble at some point.

    I'm actually looking forward to this.

    @erics44. Its at 147 and not 154. Its actually a unification fight because the WBC never stripped Floyd as they said they would. They know where their supper hangs.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    I do not want to watch Floyd fight anyone at welterweight as he beats them all. I want to see him challenged and that can only be a middleweight.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,081
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    993
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    It took Maidana 10 rounds to land on Khan. He went 50-50 with an ancient bloated Morales. Got totally schooled by Alexander.

    He qualified for this fight because he "proved" himself at 147 by beating Adrien Broner, whose only win at 147 is Paulie Malignaggi, which he scraped through.

    I love Maidana but this is a shit mismatch. He wont land a punch. Round one to twelve rinse and repeat.
    I don't disagree with any of this. BUT...if we are simply talking about who deserved this fight more between Khan or Maidana.....clearly Maidana. Marcos is on a 4 fight win streak (most by KO/TKO) and just beat one of boxing rising stars. He has improved compared to a few years ago and a lot of fans like his style of aggression. No question Floyd is a huge favorite...but Maidana is a live body with momentum (not to mention will have the backing of Latino fans during a Cinco de Mayo fight). While Floyd should win with relative ease...i aint going to piss on Maidana. Dude is not some bum.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,714
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5040
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    The only reason Maidana is in his mouth is for the Broner win, nothing more. But I don't call him a pussy just as anyone calling Broner a pussy for taking Maidana were talking out the arse. Anyone not drinking the Kool aid saw Broners holes and how he was willing to absorb. The kid wants to be a reality tv star as much as a skilled boxer and he got his ass handed to him by a seasoned hardened professional who didn't buy the sales pitch. It's not a match substance or super stardom but really Floyd's opportunity to meet a quota. I have zero doubt Maidana is going to attempt to remove Floyd's head and kick it around the ring smiling but this isn't some rush job of a pretender who short cutted his way to the big stage with no answers for the tough questions.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    another point i dissagree with is that people thought maidana would be a push over for broner, its possible that they did, i didnt read it anywhere that they did and i definately didnt, i didnt bet on maidana because i thought it would go the distance and he would be robbed

    Well let me quote from the original thread I replied to many months ago (the context of the thread was that Broner/Maidana was taken off PPV, and people were agreeing with the decision). You replied to this thread so you must have seen them.


    I'm not that interested in Broner-Maidana. With all the big fights GB has around that weight for Broner, it seems like they are feeding Maidana too him.

    Me neither.. this is a gimmie fight for broner really and gbp changing this to a non ppv event kind of shows that. They figured people arent going to pay for this mismatch so they backtracked.Broner-maidana is a Boxing after Dark level fight.. Easy fight for broner..

    Maidana should be tailor made for broner but honestly if gavin rees can tag ya so can maidana, so hopefully broner doesn't tighten up his defense and eats one he doesn't seem comin but don't see it happenin.

    Maidana is a tough dude, but styles make fights. Maidana is a mauler who leaves himself open. In my opinion, this is a fight to make Broner look good after the sour taste left in people's mouths from his last fight. I think they'll stay away from boxers for a while with Broner. As far as outcomes, I could see something comparable to Alexander - Urango

    this kinda reminds me of mayweater v gatti. i think that might be what golden boy sees as well. but broner ain't floyd and marcos ain't arturo... hopefully it ends differently.

    (Maidana) is so slow and robotic. Hes a tough guy but dont see him lasting past 7 or 8

    Broners going to look good here imo, could even be a DeMarco type showing. He's not going to have to look for Maidana, he'll be able to get set and let his hands go to the body. The guy reminds me vaguely of Canelo as much as anyone else in truth, maybe I'm nuts there but he's not great on his feet and needs to plant them to get off, kind of punches in a shell etc. Still don't see Maidana winning this though, Broner can hurt him and will tee off.

    Maidana's Achilles Heel is well-known, he's susceptible to speed and body punches. Broner will target the body early in the fight with his speed and stop Maidana. Boxers can beat Broner, but Maidana isn't a boxer. That's why this fight wasn't worth PPV.



    And some from some different threads pre-fight…

    "If ever there was a fighter tailor made for Broners style it is Maidana. I'm not sure the guy can even move laterally. Its going to appear that you are watching a fight split screen because the speed difference will be that obvious. His style feeds Broners. Look for a white object to be thrown in late and a defeated Maidana sitting on his stool looking like a human pincushion. Paulie and Rees gave Broner more trouble then Maidana will"

    "I don't think he'll have any serious problems with Maidana, but almost anything can happen in the ring so I'll keep hoping he has some humility beat into his ass."

    "Broner picks him apart."

    "Great card. Maidana Broner will most likely be very 1 sided but Karas Thurman should be a war..."

    "Broner wins by KO in 1st half. I love Maidana but he is tailor made for Broner"

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    What kind of name value does Maidana have? He's not some famous boxing star. He doesn't do huge ratings on TV. He has never even been an A-side of a fight. Remember when Maidana fought Ortiz, Khan, Broner etc., he was the B-side. So, why is Maidana a less-than-optimal opponent? Because there were better opponents out there for Mayweather above 147 and because we've seen Mayweather beat crude sluggers over and over again. Why should Mayweather move up? Because he's the best by far of the available challengers at 147 and he calls himself TBE -- so prove it. This is a waste of a fight on his legacy. It falls in the group of his sub-par defenses, a group that includes Guerrero, Ortiz, and Baldomir, among others. Let's just say this, the Canelo-Mayweather line opened up at 2-1 (closed higher for Mayweather), this fight's line opnened up at 14-1. That's all that really needs to be said. It's shite, gentlemen. Sorry, but it is.
    Maidana has a lot of heat from upsetting Broner. Regardless of what you think of Adrien (you predicted a complete domination by Broner), that was a huge upset that got a lot of publicity, particularly on social media. Is he the B-side to Floyd Mayweather? Of course he is. But he has a lot of momentum and name value off of that win.

    You say Floyd should move up: ok, answer my initial question - who should he have fought at 154?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Perhaps people believed in Broners hype and that his style is similar to Floyd's?
    Yeah apparently people did.

    "LOL, the main thing here is he was fighting Paulie. No need to defend yourself everytime he hits you its like a pillow hitting your face. (context: You said that in defense or Broner's lack of defense in the Paulie fight) (Maidana) is so slow and robotic. Hes a tough guy but dont see him lasting past 7 or 8.

    Just for the record I would be delighted to eat crow here. I hope you guys are right because I love Maidana and hate Broner. But I think his style suits Broner perfectly."

    -Silkeyjoe

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1249
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    What kind of name value does Maidana have? He's not some famous boxing star. He doesn't do huge ratings on TV. He has never even been an A-side of a fight. Remember when Maidana fought Ortiz, Khan, Broner etc., he was the B-side. So, why is Maidana a less-than-optimal opponent? Because there were better opponents out there for Mayweather above 147 and because we've seen Mayweather beat crude sluggers over and over again. Why should Mayweather move up? Because he's the best by far of the available challengers at 147 and he calls himself TBE -- so prove it. This is a waste of a fight on his legacy. It falls in the group of his sub-par defenses, a group that includes Guerrero, Ortiz, and Baldomir, among others. Let's just say this, the Canelo-Mayweather line opened up at 2-1 (closed higher for Mayweather), this fight's line opnened up at 14-1. That's all that really needs to be said. It's shite, gentlemen. Sorry, but it is.
    Maidana has a lot of heat from upsetting Broner. Regardless of what you think of Adrien (you predicted a complete domination by Broner), that was a huge upset that got a lot of publicity, particularly on social media. Is he the B-side to Floyd Mayweather? Of course he is. But he has a lot of momentum and name value off of that win.

    You say Floyd should move up: ok, answer my initial question - who should he have fought at 154?
    Anyone who fights Floyd is a B-side.

    We've agreed and disagreed on too many boxing topics over the years @Beanflicker to think that I wouldn't completely eat crow for my Maidana-Broner. I was wrong then and I'm sure I admitted as much, if I didn't my apologies. In retrospect, I'm an idiot because I should have seen the signs that Broner was overrated. At the time, I thought they were keeping Broner away from boxers after seeing how Paulie and Rees (for three rounds) did against Broner and picked Maidana for a reason. In any event, it was a great win for Maidana, but that doesn't mean he can win a round against Floyd.

    Lara (coming off a complete dismantling of Trout), Kirkland (career is resurrected by reuniting with Wolfe and great win over Tapia), Trout (loss to Lara and Canelo but a southpaw, tall, and decent speed), the better Charlo brother, Andrade (former Olympian, has a belt, beat Vanes), even Molina (tough style, draws against Lara, beat Kirkland really, and beat Floyd's guy Ishe), even go for glory and fight Kid Choc for a middleweight strap. I'm not suggesting these guys beat Mayweather, but they're tougher challenges than Maidana at 14-1, they're not with Top Rank, and there are story lines they could gin up for the fight.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1271
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Hah, no need to hang people out for picking Broner in that one, I think most thought he'd win, and it doesn't mean they were buying the hype. Maidanas only true test at WW before that was in losing every round to Alexander, and he'd been in some real trouble against Lopez the fight before as well. Whether he's improved that much, or whether Broner just wasn't as good as it seemed doesn't really matter, Maidana has next to nothing against Mayweather imo.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    662
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Perhaps people believed in Broners hype and that his style is similar to Floyd's?
    Yeah apparently people did.

    "LOL, the main thing here is he was fighting Paulie. No need to defend yourself everytime he hits you its like a pillow hitting your face. (context: You said that in defense or Broner's lack of defense in the Paulie fight) (Maidana) is so slow and robotic. Hes a tough guy but dont see him lasting past 7 or 8.

    Just for the record I would be delighted to eat crow here. I hope you guys are right because I love Maidana and hate Broner. But I think his style suits Broner perfectly."

    -Silkeyjoe
    Happy to eat crow here. But in fairness Broner wasnt as good as I thought he was, Floyd is!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In defense of Maidana/PBF

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Anyone who fights Floyd is a B-side.

    We've agreed and disagreed on too many boxing topics over the years @Beanflicker to think that I wouldn't completely eat crow for my Maidana-Broner. I was wrong then and I'm sure I admitted as much, if I didn't my apologies. In retrospect, I'm an idiot because I should have seen the signs that Broner was overrated. At the time, I thought they were keeping Broner away from boxers after seeing how Paulie and Rees (for three rounds) did against Broner and picked Maidana for a reason. In any event, it was a great win for Maidana, but that doesn't mean he can win a round against Floyd.

    Lara (coming off a complete dismantling of Trout), Kirkland (career is resurrected by reuniting with Wolfe and great win over Tapia), Trout (loss to Lara and Canelo but a southpaw, tall, and decent speed), the better Charlo brother, Andrade (former Olympian, has a belt, beat Vanes), even Molina (tough style, draws against Lara, beat Kirkland really, and beat Floyd's guy Ishe), even go for glory and fight Kid Choc for a middleweight strap. I'm not suggesting these guys beat Mayweather, but they're tougher challenges than Maidana at 14-1, they're not with Top Rank, and there are story lines they could gin up for the fight.

    I'm not trying to throw you under the bus for a bad prediction - I've made plenty of them myself - just trying to illustrate that the upset over Broner was indeed a big win.

    And I get what you're saying, there are a lot of guys out there who are tougher fights for Mayweather. But that's not how boxing works, man. You know that. No champion in the history of boxing fought guys just based on how tough they were. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying champions didn't want to test themselves against tough fighters, but there always had to be a significant amount of reward to go along with the risk.

    Austin Trout? You're telling me you think a guy coming off of two losses should get a megafight with the sports #1 p4p? Come on.

    Charlo? Come on man. He's a young prospect with less than 20 fights and is only now fighting for a world title against Molina. You mean to tell me you'd throw Charlo in there with Floyd before he had his first 12 rounder? Come on, that's insane.

    I love James Kirkland, but he's still on the comeback trail in terms of his career. He isn't even ranked in the top 10. Do you really think Floyd should be fighting a guy not even ranked in the top 10 at 154? Where's the logic behind that. Nobody would give two shits about that fight.

    Andrade is very promising but again, another young prospect with no name value who just fought and won his first world title (if you can call the WBO a "world title") against another solid fighter with very little name value.

    Lara is the only realistic option out of those, and I agree he's the best test for Floyd at 154, but how do you sell that fight? Lara has no name value.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. In Defense For The Filipino
    By titleist905t in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-02-2010, 09:06 AM
  2. The Art Of Self Defense
    By BoxingGorilla in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 09:50 PM
  3. In defense of PBF
    By beds in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-20-2006, 09:49 PM
  4. better defense
    By 9 mili brother in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-29-2006, 05:21 AM
  5. defense styles
    By danmackay in forum Important / Useful Posts
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-21-2006, 04:54 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing