Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Brook does not deserve Khan..

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,956
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Brook does not deserve Khan..

    So eddie hearn is trying to secure a berto, peterson or vargas fight for brooks next fight...why not bradley or garcia.?

    Brook MUST fight garcia and the winner of thurman vs porter this year and stop taking the easy route...sick of it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    625
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Vargas said they have to come to the States, Hearn said they still like that fight. Meanwhile Spence said he would travel, crickets.

    Hearn has basically already said they would vacate before fighting Spence when he said 2 fights and on to154. It's sad the way boxing is these days. The worst thing for your career is to demonstrate you might be good. Nobody wants to fight someone good.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    615
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Vargas isn't a terrible fight but definitely not great by any means since the WW division is stacked with solid fighters. There is no reason he shouldn't be fighting a Top 5 WW.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,412
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    896
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Vargas as in Jesse Vargas ? That would be a pretty good match up I think, I would like to see that!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    931
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    What does "deserve" even mean in this sport? If ever there was word butchered by application it’s that word in relationship to this sport.

    And btw, you don’t see the irony is using Khan as some kind of bar?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,698
    Mentioned
    1669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3022
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Brook needs some balls and get into a big fight now, no excuses. Eddie and Kell have been hanging on the coattails of Khan when they should have moved on past Amir, especially after the victory over Porter.

    Brooks would be embarrassed if he avoids the Spence fight.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3058
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Spence doesn't "deserve" Brook.... if we're going down that pathetic road.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,698
    Mentioned
    1669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3022
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Spence doesn't "deserve" Brook.... if we're going down that pathetic road.
    Spence is beating fighters to become the mandatory so he deserves the fight against Kell.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1269
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Point taken, but if Spence beats on more solid fighter, the difference between his resume and Brooks would be about 8 years of dick all and little else, and he is in line for the mandatory spot. Will Brook give up his title if he can't get a Khan fight?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7,975
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    691
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Point taken, but if Spence beats on more solid fighter, the difference between his resume and Brooks would be about 8 years of dick all and little else, and he is in line for the mandatory spot. Will Brook give up his title if he can't get a Khan fight?
    I don't understand. Why would he give his title up if he doesn't get Khan ?Brook's title is all he's got.
    As far as I'm concerned Khan can keep doing his circus acts, I don't really give a fuck about him because he's a pretty "plastic" WW as far as I'm concerned.
    Brook needs to fight next, Garcia, Thurman, Manny or Spence. Nobody else is accpetable in my book.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,698
    Mentioned
    1669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3022
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Point taken, but if Spence beats on more solid fighter, the difference between his resume and Brooks would be about 8 years of dick all and little else, and he is in line for the mandatory spot. Will Brook give up his title if he can't get a Khan fight?
    I don't understand. Why would he give his title up if he doesn't get Khan ?Brook's title is all he's got.
    As far as I'm concerned Khan can keep doing his circus acts, I don't really give a fuck about him because he's a pretty "plastic" WW as far as I'm concerned.
    Brook needs to fight next, Garcia, Thurman, Manny or Spence. Nobody else is accpetable in my book.
    Brooks needs the title to entice Khan to fight him as Amir does not have a belt. Khan wants to avenge his loss to Garcia and does not want to give Kell a payday which is a bit pathetic.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1269
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Point taken, but if Spence beats on more solid fighter, the difference between his resume and Brooks would be about 8 years of dick all and little else, and he is in line for the mandatory spot. Will Brook give up his title if he can't get a Khan fight?
    I don't understand. Why would he give his title up if he doesn't get Khan ?Brook's title is all he's got.
    As far as I'm concerned Khan can keep doing his circus acts, I don't really give a fuck about him because he's a pretty "plastic" WW as far as I'm concerned.
    Brook needs to fight next, Garcia, Thurman, Manny or Spence. Nobody else is accpetable in my book.
    That's what I mean, Spence is or is going to be his mandatory. If Brook can't get Khan and has to take that fight to keep his belt, think he will? I don't know how big a draw Brook is, but Spence won't be a payday and that's a really tough fight, hard to be optimistic give the guys career path so far.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7,975
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    691
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Point taken, but if Spence beats on more solid fighter, the difference between his resume and Brooks would be about 8 years of dick all and little else, and he is in line for the mandatory spot. Will Brook give up his title if he can't get a Khan fight?
    I don't understand. Why would he give his title up if he doesn't get Khan ?Brook's title is all he's got.
    As far as I'm concerned Khan can keep doing his circus acts, I don't really give a fuck about him because he's a pretty "plastic" WW as far as I'm concerned.
    Brook needs to fight next, Garcia, Thurman, Manny or Spence. Nobody else is accpetable in my book.
    That's what I mean, Spence is or is going to be his mandatory. If Brook can't get Khan and has to take that fight to keep his belt, think he will? I don't know how big a draw Brook is, but Spence won't be a payday and that's a really tough fight, hard to be optimistic give the guys career path so far.
    Ah, understood. But I think he's allowed a fight before Spence. He needs that big name.
    I reckon what Hearn is trying to conjure up is the Vargas fight . Beat him, get the WBO Title and then he can drop the IBF Without having to face Spence.
    That's not good enough for me, like I said , one of the previously mentioned or nothing as far as I'm concerned.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3058
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Spence doesn't "deserve" Brook.... if we're going down that pathetic road.
    Spence is beating fighters to become the mandatory so he deserves the fight against Kell.
    The point has gone over your head. What a surprise.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3058
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Brook does not deserve Khan..

    Brook/Eddie get around 75% of the wonga if Spence becomes the mandatory and the fight goes to purse bids. Why would they possibly swerve that? They have complete control of negotiations to make a killing.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Khan and Brook are better WW than Mayweather & Pac
    By Manos de Piedra in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-02-2015, 10:14 PM
  2. Khan vs Thurman vs Brook
    By imp in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-09-2015, 05:25 PM
  3. Khan v Brook
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-30-2014, 11:03 PM
  4. Khan vs brook
    By imp in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-17-2012, 05:36 AM
  5. Khan v Brook
    By ghengis cant in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-22-2010, 03:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing