Quote Originally Posted by Denilson-The-Comeback View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Denilson-The-Comeback View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
If you're gonna talk.... talk intelligently. Take your racial bullshit to the 1000 other threads you've destroyed.
Once again. You are the one who started another racial thread yeah yeah "I but no no ....i didn't ...i mean I just did a post about Tiger Woods"

You can't talk about Tiger Woods without talking race and racism


Bullshit. YOU can't talk about Tiger Woods without talking race and racism. You can't even take a shit without talking race and racism.


Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Jack Nicklaus is not only ahead of Woods in career majors won. But here's another statistic that is sure to boggle your racist brain:
Jack finished second in 19 majors. Woods is way off in the distance with 6.
And that means what ? How many majors did play ?

If you can't tell the difference between 19 and 6 I'm afraid I can't help you. Just like 18 (wins) is better than 15..... and Tiger won't get there either.


Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Jack played against better competition than Woods in their primes.
Subjective

More bullshit. See your weak-ass expanded answer below.

Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Jack had to contend with: Gary Player (nine majors), Tom Watson (eight), Arnold Palmer (seven), Lee Trevino (six) and Seve Ballesteros (five)..... ALL Hall of Famers. Jack finished 2nd more than 10 times to players on that list.
Once again. Subjective. None of them. Would do anything nowadays.


This is beyond weak. It's pathetic. I give you names and numbers..... you give me useless, idiotic rhetoric. Stick to topics you know something about, like...... well....... um.......


Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Woods had to contend with Mickelson and Els during his prime and little else. His 2nd place finishes were to one-hit wonders like: Trevor Immelman, Zach Johnson, Rich Beem, Y.E. Yang and Michael Campbell.
Look. Everyone knows Tiger (at his best) took the game to new levels. Way beyond that of Jack Nicklaus. In fact Golf back then wasn't taken as seriously.

Another gem for my collection..... thank you. "Golf back then wasn't taken as seriously." HAHAHAHA!!! I don't have to argue with you. You do a pretty good job yourself of looking like a moron.

The bottom line is. You put Jack Nicklaus (at his best) and Tiger Woods (at his best) over 18 holes.

Who would win ?

Woods wins everytime



Tiger himself has been quoted as saying "He's the greatest champion that's ever lived" when talking about Jack Nicklaus.

I'll throw you some scraps and tell you I'm not saying Tiger is shit. He's very likely the 2nd best player in history. Just not good enough to be the GOAT. That spot is taken.




I hate to be nit picky or anything but........................ shouldn't those hands be black?