So we not gonna talk about how they robbed Chisora v Parker?

[ykdadamaja]

What an all out robbery of Derek Chisora. This is the second time I have seen him robbed, the first time was against Robert Helenius. All out robbery!!

But, Parker has been nicking fights he should have lost- in my opinion. This fight against Chisora is one of them, the second fight he lost- in my opinion- was the fight against Andy Ruiz. He got the hometown nod!

Now, if the judges feel like a guy is more marketable for the future, then say that and pay the losing fighter double the purse. But don't tell me Parker won that fight fair and square.

[palmerq]

When @Master thinks it's ok that the British guy lost I think the chances are it wasn't a robbery.

[Rotten Apple]

Nobody gives a fuck about Derek Chisora. So nobody cares

[Master]

Chisora was not robbed he lost a close fight. He is very lucky to keep on getting these opportunities as he is not a world class fighter. Chisora got tired the further the fight went and Parker only offered a rematch because he would win easier the next time.

[SlimTrae]

Chisora isn't a world class boxer, but I do give props to the fighters who choose him. He's beatable but there's a price to pay.

[TonnnnUK]

It was a close fight but had Parker edging it. A draw would have been fair, or either man by a round or 2 so it wasn't a robbery by any stretch. That 116-111 card was a stinker though and that's probably what makes it seem like a robbery.

[erics44]

The helenius fight was a huge robbery, one of the worst ive seen

Chisora won at least 10 of the rounds clearly

he wasnt robbed against parker tho, it was close, maybe he did just nick it