Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    His last fight he was dominating Dimitrenko, he had his opponent down in round 1, 2 and round 3.

    His opponent went down and took a knee.. His knee was clearly down then he fired a shot straight into the guys ribs.

    That was the knockout blow, he should have clearly been disqualified

    BUT NOOOO.. protect the prospects, doesn't matter that he was winning clearly he should have been DQd
    Last edited by Vendettos; 12-10-2016 at 12:39 AM.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Are you mad?

    That fight was one way traffic and the guy was looking for a way out of the fight. It would have been an in justice if they disqualified him just like Roy Jones first loss. It was wrong.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Are you mad?

    That fight was one way traffic and the guy was looking for a way out of the fight. It would have been an in justice if they disqualified him just like Roy Jones first loss. It was wrong.

    2 fighters with records 15-15-10 and that's a DQ.

    Rules are rules and he broke the rules. He hit a guy who was down and the ref knew it because he initially waved his hands saying no KD and once he noticed the guy was staying down he started counting.

    Ref protected Parkers record, he bottled it.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,001
    Mentioned
    183 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1748
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Post a vid. I thought you were only posting in vids from now on? You're such a quitter.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    The opponent was a joke and surprised he was even rated that high. He did not even try. Forget rules and use your common sense. It would have been a travesty if they disqualified Parker. The man was faking the injury and he should be a actor not a boxer.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Post a vid. I thought you were only posting in vids from now on? You're such a quitter.
    @Memphis haha, I'm sitting in work. Have not gave up on the video format.



    Master even if Dimitrenko wasn't injured and he was acting, it's an illegal shot.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
    Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.

    If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it?
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
    Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.

    If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it?
    I honestly never seen Parker fight before but I was appalled by the lack of effort by his opponent. No way that cunt deserves the fight by disqualification.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    890
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
    Probably more on how the fight is going.

    Terry Norris, one of my favourite fighter was disqualified twice against the same person (also faking) and I was more annoyed at Terry for making the mistake.

    Roy Jones should never have been disqualified.

    Arthur Abrahams not so sure
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    584
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?

  15. #15
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch



    Dimitrenko wasn't winning but come on, that's a cheap one right there.......arm up, ribs exposed, that'll put anyone down

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Good one punch Ko from Joseph Parker
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-09-2014, 01:11 AM
  2. Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 04:32 PM
  3. I know the answer sounds obvious but.........
    By leftylee in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 02:55 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-29-2006, 07:30 PM
  5. Isn't obvious why hatton's workrate dropped....
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2006, 02:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing