No it's not silly as my reasoning is based on FACT. Can I prove Brook would beat these fighters? No. Does the evidence suggest Brook can compete with these fighters? Yes. Why? Lets take a brief look at the stats/form.
Geale - official weight 159¼ lbs: Lost TKO 3. Suffered knock down in round 2. Knocked down in round 3. Quit. Combined rounds won on official judges scorecards = Zero (20-17, 20-17, 20-17).
Rubio - official weight 161¾ lbs (Failed Weight): Lost KO 2. Unable to beat count. Combined rounds won on official judges scorecards = Zero (10-9, 10-9, 10-9)
Monroe Jr - official weight 159¾ lbs: Lost TKO 6. Knocked down twice in round 2. Knocked down in round 6, failed to respond to ref. Combined rounds won on official judges scorecards = 1 (50-43, 50-43, 49-44)
Wade - official weight 159½ lbs: Lost KO 2. Suffered knock down in round 1. Knocked down twice in round 2. Unable to beat count. Combined rounds won on official judges scorecards = Zero (10-8, 10-8, 10-8 )
Murray - official weight 159¾: Lost TKO 11. Suffered two knock downs in round 4. Knocked down in round 10. Ref stops fight in round 11. Combined rounds won on official judges scorecards = 2 (99-88, 99-88, 100-87).
Brook - official weight 159½ lbs: Lost TKO 5. Corner stopped fight due to eye injury. Combined rounds won on official judges scorecards = 5 (38-38, 38-38, 39-37).
So the form highlights that - Brook weighed the same as these men, he was never floored - unlike these men - and won more rounds according to the official judges than all these men put together.
Therefore... why is it "silly" to consider Brook could beat one of these men?
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Mods should be held to a higher standard. Just sayin'
Otherwise, how are you to be expected to moderate a forum when the personal insults fly.
But I'm glad you're impervious to the name calling.
That relieves any guilt about calling you a moron...... if I were to do such a thing.
But this thread is about the opinion that Loma is p4p #1, and to those of us who consider a pro career something more than 9 fights, we respectfully disagree. That's not to say Loma won't be p4p #1 worthy soon... but anointing him now is a slap in the face to those fighters who have proven themselves over the course of a more significant number of fights. And........... since p4p is mythical and strictly about opinion... even us "dullards" are entitled to ours.
How convenient, so you can say and do whatever you like but mods can't because you view them as parent figures? Grow up. If someone gets offended by being called an idiot, after making an idiotic post, then the observation is justified.
I'm entitled to an opinion just as everyone else is. If you don't like it - tough. What would be morally wrong (by my standards) is if I banned or censored you just because I think you're a dullard. Maybe one day i'll meet your standards of modderwaddering.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Let's recap some of your boxing nuggets of wisdom:
1. You have a lifelong obsession that JMM ducked Naz. You've devoted pages and pages of boyish-adulation-driven nonsense trying to back up that bogus claim.
2. You practically consider Brook a bonafide MW because he jumped up two divisions for one fight and got beat down by GGG. Then jumped right back down. We all love Brook, but do not wear the same rose-tinted glasses you wear, and are thus grounded in reality. You use bogus numbers and "back them up" with your infantile "Fact".
3. You declare that Lomachenko is the world's # p4p for no other good reason, but because you say so. Anyone who doesn't share your opinion is an imbecile and a dullard. Meanwhile, it is pointed out that you're a moron, and you take offense.
There's more, but you get the point.
Don't worry though. I'll always be around to set you straight.
The guys I listed didn't work their way up. There are many others as well like Mares or Spinks, Armstrong went from 126 to 147. Napoles is probably more in line with Brook as he went back to 147. The thing is most guys who move up and try to come back down again seem to suffer. Think Jones Jr for example. The question was how can a fighter be a tougher challenge than contenders/ex champions at the weight the champion fights at. @Master may have been talking about Brook but I think @Fenster and myself have given examples that this could in fact be the case. With Brook we may never know as he might not ever get back to 160 but I think he would be at least 50/ 50 with some of the guys that have challenged GGG. As history has shown many of the best welterweights have been competitive at 160.
Is that a white flag? JK
Hi Alpha welcome back to the thread.
Ok, you mentioned Mickey Walker challenging Harry Greb at middleweight. But note that Walker had several fights near the MW weight immediately preceding this fight. He went back down after Greb as you say, then eventually continued moving up all the way to LHW. Probably a sign of someone needing to grow into his frame. Carmen Basilio campaigned most of his career at WW, moved up to MW, albeit a small one... and stayed there. Same with Griffith. Let's wait and see what happens with Brook. Maybe it's that he picked on the wrong MW to try and make the move up. The thing with Brook is he skipped 154 and went straight to 160... a very tall order.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks