Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,234
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    His last fight he was dominating Dimitrenko, he had his opponent down in round 1, 2 and round 3.

    His opponent went down and took a knee.. His knee was clearly down then he fired a shot straight into the guys ribs.

    That was the knockout blow, he should have clearly been disqualified

    BUT NOOOO.. protect the prospects, doesn't matter that he was winning clearly he should have been DQd
    Nigel Benn would have another 3 or 4 losses by DQ if we go to the letter of the law.
    Last edited by Dark Lord Al; 12-10-2016 at 04:16 AM.

  2. #17
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Nigel Benn would have another 3 or 4 losses by DQ is we go to the letter of the law.
    He should have had those losses.....Hell McClellan beat the piss out of him and any other ref would have stopped that fight

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    So did Tyson.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #19
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    So did Tyson.
    Yeah against Savarese he really went nuts

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    889
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
    To box again
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    584
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    So what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?

    Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
    Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?

    You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.

    P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    734
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    So what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?

    Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
    Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?

    You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.

    P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
    I'm not 100% but I believe if the illegal shot isn't fight ending it's a deduction but if it causes the fight to be stopped then DQ is called.

    So yeah I'm still by my initial point.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
    To box again
    Dirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    584
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    So what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?

    Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
    Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?

    You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.

    P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
    I'm not 100% but I believe if the illegal shot isn't fight ending it's a deduction but if it causes the fight to be stopped then DQ is called.

    So yeah I'm still by my initial point.
    So if the person on the receiving end plays it up and makes out they are unable to continue then it's a DQ?

    It's a man's sport, I get what you are saying but I think a lot of it is down to the ref to make a judgement call.

    If he thinks someone is playing it up as an excuse to get outta there then fuck em and that is precisely what happened in the Parker fight

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    889
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Nigel Benn would have another 3 or 4 losses by DQ is we go to the letter of the law.
    He should have had those losses.....Hell McClellan beat the piss out of him and any other ref would have stopped that fight
    why should he have stopped the fight?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    889
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
    To box again
    Dirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.
    @Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
    To box again
    Dirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.
    @Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?
    LOL when I first saw the punch I thought it was nothing but Dirrell was seriously hurt. Now I am not sure if it was that particular punch that caused him the problem.

    Remember Eubank v Dan Sherry and the back header?
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    889
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
    To box again
    Dirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.
    @Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?
    LOL when I first saw the punch I thought it was nothing but Dirrell was seriously hurt. Now I am not sure if it was that particular punch that caused him the problem.

    Remember Eubank v Dan Sherry and the back header?
    was he fuck hurt

    all that twitching on the floor

    its the kind of twitching kids do when they are pretending to be dead

    being a boxing fan i've seen plenty of people knocked out and I know the difference between being knocked out and doing some ridiculous acting job
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you now?
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Good one punch Ko from Joseph Parker
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-09-2014, 01:11 AM
  2. Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 04:32 PM
  3. I know the answer sounds obvious but.........
    By leftylee in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 02:55 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-29-2006, 07:30 PM
  5. Isn't obvious why hatton's workrate dropped....
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2006, 02:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing