Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  10
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    742
    Cool Clicks

    Default NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Missions | Europa Mission

    Europa - Overview | Planets - NASA Solar System Exploration

    "Europa - an icy moon of Jupiter - is slightly smaller than Earth's moon. It is unique in the solar system, being thought to have a global ocean of water in contact with a rocky sea floor. If the ocean is proven to exist, Europa could be a promising place to look for life beyond Earth."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    What are the things I love the most about freedom is that he always post stuff about astrophysics. That is one of my favorite topics of all time

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    What are the things I love the most about freedom is that he always post stuff about astrophysics. That is one of my favorite topics of all time
    We could send you to the moon.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,130
    Mentioned
    503 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    It’s a near certainty that life exists on other planets (not just maybe Proxima B) but many other planets.

    The only way that this isn’t true is if there’s a god who has only decided to create one planet with life.

    That blue dot ? It’s 200 light years (A light year is 5.88 trillion miles or 9.5 trillion km) in diameter. It happens to represent how far all of our radio communications have travelled through space… ever.

    This is how far they’ve gotten after two hundred years travelling at the speed of light (186,000 miles a sec)



    Our galaxy (The Milky Way)



    Our solar system is the tiny, insignificant part of the blue dot, which is a tiny insignificant part of our galaxy.

    Our solar system makes up just 0.01% of the area of that blue dot. And the blue dot is 0.0004% of the area of the our galaxy and there are 100+ billion galaxies. So our galaxy isn’t even significant in the scheme of things.

    Just to put that into perspective – If you have just $1, you are much closer to Bill Gates’ net worth ($79.1 billion) than this galaxy (Milky Way) is to the number of total galaxies. Our solar system is pretty insignificant

    So if creating life were easy enough to happen once by random chance then it’s probable enough to happen many times. Because the universe is so fucking big it's unreal

    More importantly what would life on other planets look and be like ?

    I would not expect humanoid development to be a universal rule of any sort. Life on earth takes on many forms. We have life that’s totally underwater, that flies, that is intelligent, that isn’t, that lives on top of mountains, that lives with virtually no water.

    So lifeforms on other planets may look quite a bit different.

    What if the dinosaurs were never wiped out? Would one of them have developed humanlike intelligence?

    Who knows Europa might be full of dinosaurs?



    Or if Proxima B planet (the Earth-like planet that circles Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to the Sun.) has low gravity and an atmosphere three times denser than Earth’s, then animals as large as whales might find flying cool, according to scientists.



    When you think that the universe has been around for 13.8 billion years and the earth for 4.6 billion years, and life on earth for 3.6 billion years. Then humans have only been around for 200,000 years, but it was only 10,000 years ago that agriculture (arguably the start of “modern civilization”) began.

    10,000 years is nothing in comparison to the history of the world. As badass as humans think we are – It doesn’t take much of a “head start” to be way ahead of human civilisation.

    If you ask me, we’re probably best off not encountering other intelligent life. The benefits are intellectual, maybe some science advancement.

    But the risks if the life we find is more advanced than us?

    Massive.

    Just ask any civilisation on earth that encountered more advanced cultures.

    Would any say that they’re the better for it?

    Of course, we have little choice in the matter. It’s the more advanced cultures that tend to discover the less advanced cultures, since it’s advancement that offers the ability for exploration. If we encounter other lifeforms that are more advanced, they’ll likely found us.

    Let’s just hope it goes well.
    Last edited by denilson200; 02-18-2017 at 08:55 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,234
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Quote Originally Posted by denilson200 View Post
    It’s a near certainty that life exists on other planets (not just maybe Proxima B) but many other planets.

    The only way that this isn’t true is if there’s a god who has only decided to create one planet with life.

    That blue dot ? It’s 200 light years in diameter. It happens to represent how far all of our radio communications have travelled through space… ever.

    This is how far they’ve gotten after two hundred years travelling at the speed of light.



    Our galaxy.



    Our solar system (Milky way) is the tiny, insignificant part of the blue dot, which is a tiny insignificant part of our galaxy.

    Our solar system makes up just 0.01% of the area of that blue dot. And the blue dot is 0.0004% of the area of the Milky Way and there are 100+ billion galaxies. So our galaxy isn’t even significant in the scheme of things.

    Just to put that into perspective – If you have just $1, you are much closer to Bill Gates’ net worth ($79.1 billion) than this galaxy (Milky Way) is to the number of total galaxies. Our solar system is pretty insignificant

    So if creating life were easy enough to happen once by random chance then it’s probable enough to happen many times. Because the universe is so fucking it's unreal big.

    More importantly what would life on other planets look and be like ?

    I would not expect humanoid development to be a universal rule of any sort. Life on earth takes on many forms. We have life that’s totally underwater, that flies, that is intelligent, that isn’t, that lives on top of mountains, that lives with virtually no water.

    So lifeforms on other planets may look quite a bit different.

    What if the dinosaurs were never wiped out? Would one of them have developed humanlike intelligence?

    Who knows Europa might be full of dinosaurs?



    Or if Proxima B planet (the Earth-like planet that circles Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to the Sun.) has low gravity and an atmosphere three times denser than Earth’s, then animals as large as whales might find flying cool, according to scientists.



    When you think that the universe has been around for 13.8 billion years and the earth for 4.6 billion years, and life on earth for 3.6 billion years. Then humans have only been around for 200,000 years, but it was only 10,000 years ago that agriculture (arguably the start of “modern civilization”) began.

    10,000 years is nothing in comparison to the history of the world. As badass as humans think we are – It doesn’t take much of a “head start” to be way ahead of human civilisation.

    If you ask me, we’re probably best off not encountering other intelligent life. The benefits are intellectual, maybe some science advancement.

    But the risks if the life we find is more advanced than us?

    Massive.

    Just ask any civilisation on earth that encountered more advanced cultures.

    Would any say that they’re the better for it?

    Of course, we have little choice in the matter. It’s the more advanced cultures that tend to discover the less advanced cultures, since it’s advancement that offers the ability for exploration. If we encounter other lifeforms that are more advanced, they’ll likely found us.

    Let’s just hope it goes well.

    Full of dinosaurs or maybe white supremacists ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    24,896
    Mentioned
    946 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1315
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by denilson200 View Post
    It’s a near certainty that life exists on other planets (not just maybe Proxima B) but many other planets.

    The only way that this isn’t true is if there’s a god who has only decided to create one planet with life.

    That blue dot ? It’s 200 light years in diameter. It happens to represent how far all of our radio communications have travelled through space… ever.

    This is how far they’ve gotten after two hundred years travelling at the speed of light.



    Our galaxy.



    Our solar system (Milky way) is the tiny, insignificant part of the blue dot, which is a tiny insignificant part of our galaxy.

    Our solar system makes up just 0.01% of the area of that blue dot. And the blue dot is 0.0004% of the area of the Milky Way and there are 100+ billion galaxies. So our galaxy isn’t even significant in the scheme of things.

    Just to put that into perspective – If you have just $1, you are much closer to Bill Gates’ net worth ($79.1 billion) than this galaxy (Milky Way) is to the number of total galaxies. Our solar system is pretty insignificant

    So if creating life were easy enough to happen once by random chance then it’s probable enough to happen many times. Because the universe is so fucking it's unreal big.

    More importantly what would life on other planets look and be like ?

    I would not expect humanoid development to be a universal rule of any sort. Life on earth takes on many forms. We have life that’s totally underwater, that flies, that is intelligent, that isn’t, that lives on top of mountains, that lives with virtually no water.

    So lifeforms on other planets may look quite a bit different.

    What if the dinosaurs were never wiped out? Would one of them have developed humanlike intelligence?

    Who knows Europa might be full of dinosaurs?



    Or if Proxima B planet (the Earth-like planet that circles Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to the Sun.) has low gravity and an atmosphere three times denser than Earth’s, then animals as large as whales might find flying cool, according to scientists.



    When you think that the universe has been around for 13.8 billion years and the earth for 4.6 billion years, and life on earth for 3.6 billion years. Then humans have only been around for 200,000 years, but it was only 10,000 years ago that agriculture (arguably the start of “modern civilization”) began.

    10,000 years is nothing in comparison to the history of the world. As badass as humans think we are – It doesn’t take much of a “head start” to be way ahead of human civilisation.

    If you ask me, we’re probably best off not encountering other intelligent life. The benefits are intellectual, maybe some science advancement.

    But the risks if the life we find is more advanced than us?

    Massive.

    Just ask any civilisation on earth that encountered more advanced cultures.

    Would any say that they’re the better for it?

    Of course, we have little choice in the matter. It’s the more advanced cultures that tend to discover the less advanced cultures, since it’s advancement that offers the ability for exploration. If we encounter other lifeforms that are more advanced, they’ll likely found us.

    Let’s just hope it goes well.

    Full of dinosaurs or maybe white supremacists ?
    Same thing
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,333
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    851
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Quote Originally Posted by denilson200 View Post
    It’s a near certainty that life exists on other planets (not just maybe Proxima B) but many other planets.

    The only way that this isn’t true is if there’s a god who has only decided to create one planet with life.

    That blue dot ? It’s 200 light years in diameter. It happens to represent how far all of our radio communications have travelled through space… ever.

    This is how far they’ve gotten after two hundred years travelling at the speed of light.



    Our galaxy.



    Our solar system (Milky way) is the tiny, insignificant part of the blue dot, which is a tiny insignificant part of our galaxy.

    Our solar system makes up just 0.01% of the area of that blue dot. And the blue dot is 0.0004% of the area of the Milky Way and there are 100+ billion galaxies. So our galaxy isn’t even significant in the scheme of things.

    Just to put that into perspective – If you have just $1, you are much closer to Bill Gates’ net worth ($79.1 billion) than this galaxy (Milky Way) is to the number of total galaxies. Our solar system is pretty insignificant

    So if creating life were easy enough to happen once by random chance then it’s probable enough to happen many times. Because the universe is so fucking it's unreal big.

    More importantly what would life on other planets look and be like ?

    I would not expect humanoid development to be a universal rule of any sort. Life on earth takes on many forms. We have life that’s totally underwater, that flies, that is intelligent, that isn’t, that lives on top of mountains, that lives with virtually no water.

    So lifeforms on other planets may look quite a bit different.

    What if the dinosaurs were never wiped out? Would one of them have developed humanlike intelligence?

    Who knows Europa might be full of dinosaurs?



    Or if Proxima B planet (the Earth-like planet that circles Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to the Sun.) has low gravity and an atmosphere three times denser than Earth’s, then animals as large as whales might find flying cool, according to scientists.



    When you think that the universe has been around for 13.8 billion years and the earth for 4.6 billion years, and life on earth for 3.6 billion years. Then humans have only been around for 200,000 years, but it was only 10,000 years ago that agriculture (arguably the start of “modern civilization”) began.

    10,000 years is nothing in comparison to the history of the world. As badass as humans think we are – It doesn’t take much of a “head start” to be way ahead of human civilisation.

    If you ask me, we’re probably best off not encountering other intelligent life. The benefits are intellectual, maybe some science advancement.

    But the risks if the life we find is more advanced than us?

    Massive.

    Just ask any civilisation on earth that encountered more advanced cultures.

    Would any say that they’re the better for it?

    Of course, we have little choice in the matter. It’s the more advanced cultures that tend to discover the less advanced cultures, since it’s advancement that offers the ability for exploration. If we encounter other lifeforms that are more advanced, they’ll likely found us.

    Let’s just hope it goes well.
    @denilson200 did u get those facts from the African Union space program

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    What are the things I love the most about freedom is that he always post stuff about astrophysics. That is one of my favorite topics of all time
    We could send you to the moon.
    How about the Magnetosphere?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Denny has blown his cover.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,234
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Do you think that muslim suicide bombers are actually trying to launch themselves into space and havent yet got it right ?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Yes because according to Aya number 3 of Surah Muzzamil:

    "O Muhammad! We have launched you on a solid rocket booster into the Upper Atmosphere, of which the Unbelievers know not!"

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,126
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    468
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Hahahah!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    I actually think it is a waste of money to carry out missions like this. It costs a fortune to do that and I think that would be money better spent on trying to improve conditions here on earth. Just as people are turning away from globalism, I think people should turn away from space. Until we have a decent system on this planet and we can protect our own citizens, then we have no business poncing around looking for water on moons. We have plenty of water here and we are poisoning it on a daily basis. We need to get our priorities straight.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    I actually think it is a waste of money to carry out missions like this. It costs a fortune to do that and I think that would be money better spent on trying to improve conditions here on earth. Just as people are turning away from globalism, I think people should turn away from space. Until we have a decent system on this planet and we can protect our own citizens, then we have no business poncing around looking for water on moons. We have plenty of water here and we are poisoning it on a daily basis. We need to get our priorities straight.
    A lot of positive has come out of space exploration and as long as private money is financing it a lot of it then it is worth it.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA Mission to search for life on Europa

    I don't know, Master. I'm not sure we have discovered anything worth using here on earth. I am all for space exploration, but think we would be better off using the money to help people here and now. The world is in a horrible pickle and water on a moon just seems a bit of a silly distraction when dams are ready to burst after decades of infrastructure neglect. Seems all back to front to me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. The Truth - Why Nasa Has Never Returned To The Moon
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-07-2013, 08:32 AM
  2. Live Nasa feed
    By Youngblood in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-29-2009, 10:42 PM
  3. NASA tapes over original moon walk tape
    By OumaFan in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 07-20-2009, 04:19 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing