Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    seriously look at this dude's face------not very convincing is he?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1270
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    How is that a guilty face at all? I don't like Bush, but the idea that 911 was an inside job and nothing would have leaked out is absurd when you actually think about it, especially by now. Bush, Cheny, and a half dozen other guys all sat around and planned it, found pilots willing to kill themselves in the name of something or other, god knows what else would have been involved, and not ONE guilty conscience has come forward with anything even close to a reasonable claim that they knew something about it? Nobody involved had a loved one that they triggered suspicions with, yada yada yada?

    Conversely, think about how easy it would have been for Al queda to pull it off more or less the way that is accepted, yet THAT doesn't seem reasonable to these people. These nutters desperately WANT to think it was an inside job, because they are pathetic, that's my take.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    How is that a guilty face at all? I don't like Bush, but the idea that 911 was an inside job and nothing would have leaked out is absurd when you actually think about it, especially by now. Bush, Cheny, and a half dozen other guys all sat around and planned it, found pilots willing to kill themselves in the name of something or other, god knows what else would have been involved, and not ONE guilty conscience has come forward with anything even close to a reasonable claim that they knew something about it? Nobody involved had a loved one that they triggered suspicions with, yada yada yada?

    Conversely, think about how easy it would have been for Al queda to pull it off more or less the way that is accepted, yet THAT doesn't seem reasonable to these people. These nutters desperately WANT to think it was an inside job, because they are pathetic, that's my take.
    I never understood the 9/11 truthers. They say "no, a handful of Taliban couldn't do this to a nation. No, the building couldn't have fallen the way it did. No, building 7 couldn't have collapsed like that. No, I don't buy this at all."

    They reject all of that, that's all illogical... yet they choose to believe that a group of higher ups conspired to murder thousands of Americans, that a demolition crew was able to go into two of the busiest and most densely populated buildings in the world and somehow set up thousands of pounds of explosives without anyone noticing. And they say they did all of this to give America an excuse to go into war.

    The problem with these conspiracy guys is they have their narrative set. Guaranteed the 9/11 truther also believes Lyndon killed Kennedy, the moon landing was fake, the government is poisoning all of us with toxic "chemtrails", ect ect. It's people who want to be a part of something big and want to feel like they're smarter than the average Joe and more enlightened. It's really irritating.
    David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,795
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    Rosie O'Donnell

    If she says it was in 'inside job', then that's good enough for me.

    She's got intelligence.



  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?








    ....maybe

  6. #6
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?




    .....mmmmmmaaaaaaaybe

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    Beanflicker you clearly haven't read any of the research into the 3rd building which was an OBVIOUS controlled demolition. Forget the other two, but the evidence on that one alone is overwhelming. Stacks of evidence on the other two as well. You have thousands of firefighters, police and witnesses on the scene claiming to have heard prior explosions. You have hundreds of architects and scientists saying what happened was in no way in correlation with the official narrative.

    It usually boils down to....who has the most at stake? The government did with a deregulated, fading economy, and a new means to destroy civil liberties and also get a free run at any leader they saw fit. The patriot act was also set up far sooner than the convenient necessary attack. It's weird how Al Qaeda were masterminds for one morning only. Nothing like that prior and nothing like it since. Underwear bombers is the best they can do after toppling the 3 towers? A bit of a come down. To think they slipped by 16 government agencies just like that and yet it was the government reluctant to investigate.

    Personally, as a President I would be wanting to get to the bottom of it, but all Bush wanted was to invade Afghanistan despite these terrorists being Saudi's. All very peculiar.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    silversteen before it fell: "we decided to pull it. pull it. we have to pull it."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    Hush cries the mainstream, we don't want to hear that......

    I keep on using the term cognitive dissonance. People are so afraid to consider just how low a government will go. Better to simply face up to it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    9-11 was a faLSE FLAG in order to justify bringing in a worldwide lucrative endless war on terror as well as the surveillance state at home.

    obvious as all hell, but hey, TRUST YOUR GOVERNMENT, SHEEP.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,333
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    851
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Looking back: Have you ever seen a guiltier face?

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    9-11 was a faLSE FLAG in order to justify bringing in a worldwide lucrative endless war on terror as well as the surveillance state at home.

    obvious as all hell, but hey, TRUST YOUR GOVERNMENT, SHEEP.
    As long as they give me bread and circus I'm happy.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Crack and whores for me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-27-2011, 04:25 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-11-2009, 01:24 AM
  3. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-24-2008, 03:35 PM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-14-2007, 08:00 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-03-2007, 01:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing