Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    783
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    I think he fact that Floyd fought Oscar at 154 and beat him, looks better than Cotto beating a Shane who is further past it then first thought.

    Shane still has a great chin and amazing power but no longer boxes, Shane seems happy to try to knock his opponents out.

    Delahoya however cann box still (Mayweater/ Forbes) or knock an opponent out (Mayorga) i think the difference in this instance has been peoples pereption of the fighters.

    Mayweather/ Oscar are hated so any fight involving these too is looked upon in a negative light Cotto/ Sugar Shane are loved so this fight is looked at in a positive light!

    But when you look at this objectively in my opinion a win over this Delahoya means a lot more than a win over this new one dimensional Shane.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    I duno cuz alot of people thought Oscar beat Floyd. We saw what Oscar has left vs Forbes and we saw what Berto did to the same guy last night so hes on that level .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    783
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    I duno cuz alot of people thought Oscar beat Floyd. We saw what Oscar has left vs Forbes and we saw what Berto did to the same guy last night so hes on that level .
    The Floyd Oscar fight was pretty clear in my opinion.

    there is no doubt in my mind that both Oscar and Shane have slipped that's not my debate, my opinion is that people though Oscar had slipped a lot more than Shane but after watching Oscars last two fights and Shane's it seems Shane has slipped more than Oscar. Shane's style has changed completely whilst Oscar now just stamina problems.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Quote Originally Posted by piye View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    I duno cuz alot of people thought Oscar beat Floyd. We saw what Oscar has left vs Forbes and we saw what Berto did to the same guy last night so hes on that level .
    The Floyd Oscar fight was pretty clear in my opinion.

    there is no doubt in my mind that both Oscar and Shane have slipped that's not my debate, my opinion is that people though Oscar had slipped a lot more than Shane but after watching Oscars last two fights and Shane's it seems Shane has slipped more than Oscar. Shane's style has changed completely whilst Oscar now just stamina problems.
    Good points but also styles make fighst and Shane showed vs Collazzo he can still box. He decided for whatever reason to stand with Mayorga , maybe it was pride cuz he said he would . . . and it worked . He was ahead on the cards when he knokced him clean out

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    783
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by piye View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    I duno cuz alot of people thought Oscar beat Floyd. We saw what Oscar has left vs Forbes and we saw what Berto did to the same guy last night so hes on that level .
    The Floyd Oscar fight was pretty clear in my opinion.

    there is no doubt in my mind that both Oscar and Shane have slipped that's not my debate, my opinion is that people though Oscar had slipped a lot more than Shane but after watching Oscars last two fights and Shane's it seems Shane has slipped more than Oscar. Shane's style has changed completely whilst Oscar now just stamina problems.
    Good points but also styles make fighst and Shane showed vs Collazzo he can still box. He decided for whatever reason to stand with Mayorga , maybe it was pride cuz he said he would . . . and it worked . He was ahead on the cards when he knokced him clean out
    True.

  6. #6
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    I duno cuz alot of people thought Oscar beat Floyd. We saw what Oscar has left vs Forbes and we saw what Berto did to the same guy last night so hes on that level .
    To be honest i thought ODLH beat Steve Forbes more clearly than Andre Berto beat Steve Forbes, Andre Berto lost 4 rounds against Forbes IMO. And was getting countered and was made to miss alot of punches.

    I would love to know these people that thought ODLH beat Mayweather, because the only way people would think that, is if they had ODLH winning by a big lead after 9 rounds which is ridiculous.

    Mayweather landed the cleaner more effective punches, ODLH tried to do what Mayorga did last night against Mosley. And thats throw flurries and try to fool the judges that there landing and effective, which they aren't.

    I had Mayweather the clear winner over ODLH by 3 or 4 rounds, the only people who thought ODLH beat Mayweather are Mayweather haters.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,355
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1333
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Quote Originally Posted by piye View Post
    I think he fact that Floyd fought Oscar at 154 and beat him, looks better than Cotto beating a Shane who is further past it then first thought.

    Shane still has a great chin and amazing power but no longer boxes, Shane seems happy to try to knock his opponents out.

    Delahoya however cann box still (Mayweater/ Forbes) or knock an opponent out (Mayorga) i think the difference in this instance has been peoples pereption of the fighters.

    Mayweather/ Oscar are hated so any fight involving these too is looked upon in a negative light Cotto/ Sugar Shane are loved so this fight is looked at in a positive light!

    But when you look at this objectively in my opinion a win over this Delahoya means a lot more than a win over this new one dimensional Shane.
    Its wrong to use the term retrospect because the Oscar/ Floyd fight was 18 months ago. Oscar has looked worse since and has been picking on smaller guys at an exponential rate.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2483
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Shocked when I saw this wasn't by Taeth. Looked like one of his.

    Anyway, that's probably right and I'm not sure I ever thought his win over Shane was better. It was right up there though.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4298
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    I duno cuz alot of people thought Oscar beat Floyd. We saw what Oscar has left vs Forbes and we saw what Berto did to the same guy last night so hes on that level .
    To be honest i thought ODLH beat Steve Forbes more clearly than Andre Berto beat Steve Forbes, Andre Berto lost 4 rounds against Forbes IMO. And was getting countered and was made to miss alot of punches.

    I would love to know these people that thought ODLH beat Mayweather, because the only way people would think that, is if they had ODLH winning by a big lead after 9 rounds which is ridiculous.

    Mayweather landed the cleaner more effective punches, ODLH tried to do what Mayorga did last night against Mosley. And thats throw flurries and try to fool the judges that there landing and effective, which they aren't.

    I had Mayweather the clear winner over ODLH by 3 or 4 rounds, the only people who thought ODLH beat Mayweather are Mayweather haters.
    I watched that fight again about a week ago, and I had Mayweather winning by an even wider margin.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1283
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    I duno cuz alot of people thought Oscar beat Floyd. We saw what Oscar has left vs Forbes and we saw what Berto did to the same guy last night so hes on that level .
    To be honest i thought ODLH beat Steve Forbes more clearly than Andre Berto beat Steve Forbes, Andre Berto lost 4 rounds against Forbes IMO. And was getting countered and was made to miss alot of punches.

    I would love to know these people that thought ODLH beat Mayweather, because the only way people would think that, is if they had ODLH winning by a big lead after 9 rounds which is ridiculous.

    Mayweather landed the cleaner more effective punches, ODLH tried to do what Mayorga did last night against Mosley. And thats throw flurries and try to fool the judges that there landing and effective, which they aren't.

    I had Mayweather the clear winner over ODLH by 3 or 4 rounds, the only people who thought ODLH beat Mayweather are Mayweather haters.
    i'm no Mayweather hater and i thought Floyd won by one at most 2 rounds, my actual score was 115-113 Mayweather, the fight was close and dude, don't ever compare DLH and Mayorga together, not even fucking close

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,679
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2302
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    I had Oscar winning by a small margin midway through, but, the second half of the fight was all Mayweather. I don't see how anyone could've had Oscar winning that fight.

    But to answer the original question, I think Floyd beating Oscar is a bigger deal because Floyd fought out of his weight class while Cotto vs Mosley was two fighters in the same one.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: In retrospect Floyds win over Oscar was better than Cotto's over Shane.

    Floyd's win was much more impressive than Cotto's over Shane, and I always felt that way.

    Everyone tries to downplay PBF's win over De La Hoya. "Oscar is washed up". HOW? Its no prime De La Hoya, but he's still incredibly fast, incredibly heavy handed and had a HUGE size advantage over Floyd.

    People can call that fight boring, but it was a complete master class in the science of boxing. Floyd blocked and made Oscar miss all night, while he operated like a surgeon offensively. Floyd won that fight definitively and the fact that some believe ODLH won is a testament to how bias can hamper basic common sense.

    People forget that before his two sensational KOs over the ghost of Fernando Vargas, people were saying that Mosley was done and needed to retire, so this is nothing new. Cotto and Mosley are relatively the same size as well, unlike Floyd and DLH.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-01-2007, 06:17 AM
  2. In Retrospect
    By oldtownboxing in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-08-2007, 07:01 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-06-2006, 03:15 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing