Re: Cotto Vs Urkal ...for hatton's vacant WBA Welter belt
Originally Posted by
wacko3205
Originally Posted by
wacko3205
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Originally Posted by
wacko3205
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Cotto-Urkal is just as bad of a fight as Hatton-Urango.
Puh-leeze!
Atleast Urkal has fought a live body or two on his way up & he's defended his title a few times to boot.
Urango was gifted his title & he hasn't fought a live body other than Ben Rabah & we all saw that bullshit robbery.
It's nowhere near as bad. Cotto's fighting something other than a hype machine.
What title has Urkal defended? He's never been champion, before.
European EBU title babe.
Won it, defended it, if I am not mistaken...he still has it...either that or he vacated it for a defense against someone...I can't remember who.
Also...just checked boxrec to be sure...at Light Welter he was also a belt holder & he had & defended the WBC International Light Welterweight title on top of defending the European (EBU) Light Welterweight Title.
Currently...they show that he is titleless stateside in the U.S.
Take it from me, EBU titles mean NOTHING. They give them to whoever they like, and take them back just as quick in the form of dodgy matchmaking, rankings, jugding and refereeing, it may as well be one of those belts you get from toys r' us.
Remember the good old days, we miss you Marco!
Bookmarks