Some proof against evolution

[Von Milash]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/...uman_evolution

[X]

Hey Von, I've just read all the way through that and I can't see how it is any sort of proof against evolution? Am I missing something?

[Kev]

There isn't really anything in the article that disproves evolution although it does highlight how once again they have drawn a blank.

They do not mention in this article however that many evolutionists and paleoanthropologists now regard 'homo habilis' as being non existent in that the fossil finds are basically comprised of bits of fossils from Australopithicense and bits from homo erectus, much the same way as the Brontosaurus actually turned out to be an aptosaurus and a diplodicus head.

As for the homo erectus, well here modern science is showing just how systemically racist evolutionary theory is.

By emphasising apparant sexual dismorphism (the amount of differences between male and female of a species) they have labelled an old tribe of people as sluts and whores all sleeping with each other in a primitive animalistic way.

This despite the fact that homo erectus were actually human beings who built houses and boats, used hunting weapons and buried their dead.