The following is an excerpt from a current thread:

Re: What's the biggest boxing robbery of all time.
« Reply #217 on: Today at 06:20:30 PM » Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: ChuckNorris on Today at 01:35:45 AM
Quote from: THE THIRD MAN on Yesterday at 05:37:49 PM
Lewis V Holyfield 1....Lewis clearly won this fight, i had it 116-112 ! Result Draw
Lewis v Holyfield 2....Holyfield clearly won this fight, i had it 117-111 ! Result Lewis UD

I had Lewis winning both fights, but the second one by a smaller margin.

I'm amazed by this, Lewis clearly won the first fight but i must have missed something in the second fight because i thought Holyfield schooled him and i never gave a round to Lewis until the 9th and even that was a charity.

People will always see things differently and this leads me to my question.

Should controversial decisions be left to a 1/2 or 3/4 speed review if the general public demands it, and then the decision reversed if necessary?


I've been happy when my favorite gets the decision and pissed when they didn't as I'm sure we all have, but to me, It just seems like we have the technology to prove who won the fight, why not use it? Maybe they could correct some of the truly awful decisions of the past.