Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 64

Thread: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.
    Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.
    Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.
    hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

    but you know you brought this up because of benn and eubank.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by dasamm
    I think Hopkins stock dropped so much because they figure at his age he's not getting any better. Â Though I disagree with the outcome of the Hopkins-Taylor fight, it did show weakness in Hopkins and that weakness is only going to increase (most likely) Â I don't think he should be at #10, but that explains why he dropped so far...
    who is in your avatar?

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1071
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by dasamm
    I think Hopkins stock dropped so much because they figure at his age he's not getting any better. Â Though I disagree with the outcome of the Hopkins-Taylor fight, it did show weakness in Hopkins and that weakness is only going to increase (most likely) Â I don't think he should be at #10, but that explains why he dropped so far...
    who is in your avatar?
    Good question. Cool click, dasamm.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.
    Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.
    hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.
    6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

    Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.
    Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.
    but you know you brought this up because of benn and eubank.
    What??

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1352
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Yeah, I mean William Joppy, Glen Johnson, and Antwun Echols were all garbage! :
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2483
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired : Hopkins should still be #1, he f***in won the FIGHT!!!!
    When's somebody going to ban this idiot?
    What is your problem huh? You can completely ridicule and belittle my boys Bernard and RJJ, but dare I say anything about Eubank?!!! Get a life man!
    Well Eubank's not the one who many idiots believe is better than Sugar Ray Robinson, are you dumb? Eubank is probably the most hated boxer in the history of the game whereas Hopkins and Jones Jr are grossly over-rated (Sugar Ray Robs would eat them for supper).
    Who said that Hopkins was better than SRR? Neither of them are, doesn't mean he deserves to be 10th on the P4P.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.
    Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.
    hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.
    6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

    Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."
    He didnt loose every round. Roy is probably my favorite fighter of all time and that shit is bogus. Dont type shit like this because some people will actually believe.

    Even if Manny did say that you know it isnt true and shouldnt be typed.

    who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk
    Yeah, I mean William Joppy, Glen Johnson, and Antwun Echols were all garbage! :
    NOWHERE NEAR good enough opposition to be considered ANYWHERE NEAR Sugar Ray Robinson.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired : Hopkins should still be #1, he f***in won the FIGHT!!!!
    When's somebody going to ban this idiot?
    What is your problem huh? You can completely ridicule and belittle my boys Bernard and RJJ, but dare I say anything about Eubank?!!! Get a life man!
    Well Eubank's not the one who many idiots believe is better than Sugar Ray Robinson, are you dumb? Eubank is probably the most hated boxer in the history of the game whereas Hopkins and Jones Jr are grossly over-rated (Sugar Ray Robs would eat them for supper).
    Who said that Hopkins was better than SRR? Neither of them are, doesn't mean he deserves to be 10th on the P4P.
    it isnt hopkins fault that people rank him where they do. He always says that SRR is the best fighter of all time and during one of the round in the taylor fight he asked bouie if he should do one of srr's tricks.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,190
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    it is true that bernards rule of opposition was a bit shallow, but nevertheless he deserves to be higher on the top p4p list.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.
    Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.
    hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.
    6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

    Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."
    who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?
    Gerald McClellan, who was waaaaaaay better than Hopkins.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnum
    Quote Originally Posted by DD
    It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.
    eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.
    Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.
    hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.
    6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

    Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."
    who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?
    And why are you bringing this up? We're talking about HOPKINS you dumb ass.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing