Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 131

Thread: Beatles or Stones?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,423
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    915
    Cool Clicks

    Default Beatles or Stones?

    The only reason why I bring this topic up is because two guys at work believe the rolling stone are better. They must be high. The stones are a great rock band but that's all they are. The Beatles are so much more. They change the world and music forever. I want to see what you cats think. Please set these guys straight.

  2. #2
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    The Stones were waaaaaay more versitlie as a band, The Beatles were great but only branched out near the end and then as individual acts.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    447 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4102
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    I think the Beatles were more diverse just in that they wern't just driven from within the blues then out into hard rock.
    The beatles could do a love song or a fun song or a rockin song or a heavy one with much different structures to the music than the stones do.

    Take for instance Michelle,compared to Helter skelter or Revolution.
    It isnt from the same music structure at all.
    The stones are great and rule but they do stick more to their set ways, as do Ac/Dc for instance, but them even more so.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Is this even a real question? I sincerely doubt the veracity that anyone even postulating what your 'friends' have are doing so for any other reason than to get a rise out of you. They are busting your Stones. If the Stones never existed, the world would be exactly as it is today. The Beatles? It would be a world unrecognizable to us, in a negative way. If they claim to be serious, have them take an IQ test - they probably won't even break double figures.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,234
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2406
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    its the stones
    i hate the beatles
    Remember reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,423
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    915
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    its the stones
    i hate the beatles
    You're British and hate the Beatles? Off with his head!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1685
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    beatles

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2516
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    i never understood the beatles at all but some how they damn near took over the world. even Rolling Stone has their Sgt Peppers Lonley Hearts Club Band as the best album of all time. And i actually downloaded it to see wat it sounded like and i dont understand it.

    Maybe i should listen to it some more.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1685
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    oh forgor i know fk all abt music so dismiss me

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2745
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    I have a few Stones albums in my collection, but no Beatles. That's not likely to change.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Early Stones, latter Beatles.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4297
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    The Beatles, all day everyday. The best band of all time.

    The Stones are ridiculously overrated IMO.

    And Lyle, unless you count the ability to play shitty disco as the pinnacle of diversity, the Beatles were waaaaay more versatile than the Stones.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2745
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    The Beatles were the most popular pop band of all time, no doubt about it, although personally I find a lot of their stuff overrated, IMO.

    Musically they were probably ahead of their time, George Martin had something to do with that. So many great melodies also. But lyrically? Browse through their song catolog and make note of how many of their songs were filled with incredibly trite, inane, downright silly lyrics. But I guess lots of people like that kind of stuff.

    Beatles Lyrics Archive
    Last edited by CGM; 11-23-2008 at 06:44 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,704
    Mentioned
    1669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Beatles never understand the Stones
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,423
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    915
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Yesterday is the most covered song in history. Frank Sinatra said Something was his favorite love song. Rolling stone magazine rated the 100 greatest albums of alltime. 4 of the top 10 were Beatles albums and 6 of the top 20. With over a half a billion albums sold world wide,that just about says it all.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tonsil Stones (kinda gross)
    By TheChosenOne in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 12:17 PM
  2. BEATLES FANS - CHECK DIS OUT!!!
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 04:44 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 10:14 PM
  4. Beatles..Yellow Submarine-full film here
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-15-2007, 09:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing