Dirrell v Ward is for the vacant WBC belt not Abraham v Froch

**skel1983** · 09-07-2010 10:35 AM

That is a little unusual WBC coming in on the act while there is another rival belt on the line??

Silly move if you ask me, should of been the Abraham Froch fight with both winners having a belt to take to the final making the fight even more anticipated, strange decision.

**skel1983** · 09-07-2010 10:38 AM

But then on the other hand you could say both Froch and Abraham are coming off losses but personally I would of let the europeans fight for it then an American and European bringing a major title into the final.

**erics44** · 09-07-2010 04:40 PM

i suppose it doesnt really matter in the end coz the final is gonna be for all the belts but i know what you mean

i have a feeling froch v abraham will be a cracker so dspite who has or who is fighting for the belts its that one im looking forward to

i was thinking froch was gonna loose up until recently, but im starting to change my mind