Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 98

Thread: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    @TitoFan - You need a video? For fucks sake talk about denial (how many times?)

    Here's the same HBO guys confirming Marquez ducked Naz (@AdamGB - Frank Warren had nothing to do with Naz at this stage). All four turned down huge career high paydays.

    Last edited by Fenster; 12-13-2012 at 03:37 PM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    It took you over an hour to take the bait.
    I'm somewhat disappointed.


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    It took you over an hour to take the bait.
    I'm somewhat disappointed.

    Well I can't react to things I haven't seen.

    It actually took me about 30 seconds to provide the uninitiated with the truth.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    The truth?




  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4959
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

    Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
    Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

    He is based on what is.


    and that my friends is a fact.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

    Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
    Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

    He is based on what is.


    and that my friends is a fact.


    So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?


  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

    Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
    Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

    He is based on what is.


    and that my friends is a fact.


    So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?

    Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.

    Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.

    And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

    Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
    Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

    He is based on what is.


    and that my friends is a fact.


    So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?

    Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.

    Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.

    And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.


    "JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."


    Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
    If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

    Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
    Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

    He is based on what is.


    and that my friends is a fact.


    So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?

    Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.

    Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.

    And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.


    "JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."


    Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
    If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
    What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.

    Show me where he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"

    Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

    Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
    Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

    He is based on what is.


    and that my friends is a fact.


    So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?

    Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.

    Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.

    And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.


    "JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."


    Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
    If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
    What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.

    Show me where in his post he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"

    Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.

    He didn't say he "thinks Marquez would beat Naz".
    He said Marquez would "beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."

    Slight difference.
    If you need it to be explained, let me know.


    Also, nice try on the "me calling CMM a moron" bit.
    You sounded like the 5th grader egging on two 9th graders to a fistfight.
    How typically "Fenster-ish" of you.


  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4959
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
    That is a fact.

    Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
    That is also a fact.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Fenster?
    I believe you're up.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Well I do need it explained to me?

    How does someone saying a fighter would win a fight mean the other guy ducked him?

    And how the fuck can a fighter be "ducking" someone that is on record admitting they refused the fight?

    (beyond stupid)
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Ah... temper, temper.

    Go back and read post 41. Then let me know if there's something in there you did not understand.

    Go on now...

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2064
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Come on guys, kicking pac while he is down?

    Naz is soft compare to jmm. Jmm had to survive over 40 rounds to catch pac with a perfect counter.

    I dont think naz survives 5 rounds with pac.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Further proof there are too many titles
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:08 PM
  2. No Proof That He's Guilty?
    By sanj16 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 12:02 AM
  3. Some proof against evolution
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing