Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 98

Thread: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    NO fighter in history attacked Naz and left the ring without help. After last night there's not a serious boxing fan on earth that can argue Pac doesn't get annihilated by the rocket launchers. Fact.

    That is all.

    Thoughts?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2017
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    It probably says more about how much Hamed couldn't even hold Marquez's piss glass.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Well that maybe so, Adam

    But you can't deny we now have concrete evidence that Pac storming forward against a counter puncher, especially with the devastating power and timing of Naz, is a recipe for disaster?

    It's borderline impossible to make a case for Pac beating Naz. Lets be honest.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2017
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Pac is no Kevin Kelly, that's for sure.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1271
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    In all seriousness, there's nothing to suggest Hamed wouldn't have had a good(hypothetical) chance against either Pacquiao or Marquez, while they were still operating at or below 130 pounds. Naz and Pacquiao at that weight would have been a tremendous stlystic matchup to boot.

    What we do know is that Naseem never stuck around long enough to give any indication of whether he could've climbed up in weight and still been effective, much less dominant. Last night was a fight between two great welterweights, Hamed never showed anything to suggest he could've lived with either of these men in their present form. What Manny and Marquez have both done over the last few years is nothing short of incredible, fact.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    716
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Well that maybe so, Adam

    But you can't deny we now have concrete evidence that Pac storming forward against a counter puncher, especially with the devastating power and timing of Naz, is a recipe for disaster?

    It's borderline impossible to make a case for Pac beating Naz. Lets be honest.
    Everything in the ring is a recipe for disaster, if you lose! I'm not trying to take anything away from Marquez, that was as good a one punch KO as anyone will ever see.
    Would you consider that Manny was trying to steal the round in the last 10 seconds and got careless. Would you consider that Marquez knew Manny would do that very thing and after, I don't know how many rounds over I don't know how many years finally put it all together to bring about a terrific KO.
    Wouldn't any boxing fan expect one or the other of them to figure how to finish off the other guy after that many rounds over that many years.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,956
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    971
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Marquez would prob beat Naz.

    If pac and naz did fight would it simply be a case of who ever got hit first would be going down?

    The tree trunk legs of both these fighters is crazy.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    890
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    this is in actual fact a fact
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    I always thought JMM had the style to beat Naz which was why he was avoided. Against Manny Pac that would be a pick em and I would go for Naz.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Naz would have bombed out Marquez too. AS great as Marquez is, he's been down around 10 million times during his career

    You go down against Naz..... it's over.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,093
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Marquez has proven to be right up there with the great MAB.
    Only thing different about a JMM-Naz fight is JMM would've introduced Naz to the other corner post.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Further proof there are too many titles
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:08 PM
  2. No Proof That He's Guilty?
    By sanj16 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 12:02 AM
  3. Some proof against evolution
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing