Where do u place Morales Hamed Pacquiao Marquez barrera from each other?

[DavilaJones]

Even though I thought Marquez won the first three fight, in terms of pure accomplishments there are no doubts that Manny is number 1, as for 2 to last. Hamed last the three mexicans a tie for 2nd place

[Dropanuke]

I would rank them by how many belts held at one time

[Julius Rain]

I would rank them by how many belts held at one time

Why do you think highly of belts?

[Master]

Pac
Morales
JMM
Barrera
Naz

[TitoFan]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

[THE THIRD MAN]

Pacquiao
Marquez
Barrera
Morales








Hamed

[Julius Rain]

Can Naz really be place amongst those guys? All of those guys have lost or been down but continued on to be great.

Naz lost once and quit.

[Violent Demise]

Juan Manuel Marquez
Erik Morales
Manny Pacquiao
Marco Antonio Barrera
Kennedy McKinney
Naseem Hamed

I love the way VD keeps bias out of the equation with his decision making.

Bias would of had Barrera over Pacquiao. Clearly not the case

[Julius Rain]

I think Naz has a punchers chance in any fight and he was pretty slick. My doubt is when he gets hit (and I know he will get hit by these guys), will he have the heart like JMM had to come back and box?

Too bad he quit and never really prove more. What a waste.

[IamInuit]

From these 5 specifically who do u have in what Order ?

Exceptional question. I'll start with Morales and a small view.

Generally boxing fans have short memories. Part of this instant gratification world we live in.

I can’t think of to many guys in history that would have beaten Morales at 122 although I did think that Mab won the first fight which was at that weight
Not quite as dominant at 126 but pretty close. And I also think that Erik won the second fight against Mab which was at that weight.
At 130 I saw a slight change in Morales even though he did quite well at the beginning but the 122 or 126 Morales would have never let the one armed Chavez of the hook. This Morales beat Manny at 130. Imo Morales went off the cliff in that fight and the Zahir fight sustained that for me.

[Julius Rain]

From these 5 specifically who do u have in what Order ?

Exceptional question. I'll start with Morales and a small view.

Generally boxing fans have short memories. Part of this instant gratification world we live in.

I can’t think of to many guys in history that would have beaten Morales at 122 although I did think that Mab won the first fight which was at that weight
Not quite as dominant at 126 but pretty close. And I also think that Erik won the second fight against Mab which was at that weight.
At 130 I saw a slight change in Morales even though he did quite well at the beginning but the 122 or 126 Morales would have never let the one armed Chavez of the hook. This Morales beat Manny at 130. Imo Morales went off the cliff in that fight and the Zahir fight sustained that for me.

I dont know, I think EM was not motivated in that Zahir fight. He turned up the heat in the end and dominated but way too late to win a decision. I think he was done in, in the second fight with Pac. The third fight he seem to know he was no longer up to the pace Pac would set.

[IamInuit]

From these 5 specifically who do u have in what Order ?

Exceptional question. I'll start with Morales and a small view.

Generally boxing fans have short memories. Part of this instant gratification world we live in.

I can’t think of to many guys in history that would have beaten Morales at 122 although I did think that Mab won the first fight which was at that weight
Not quite as dominant at 126 but pretty close. And I also think that Erik won the second fight against Mab which was at that weight.
At 130 I saw a slight change in Morales even though he did quite well at the beginning but the 122 or 126 Morales would have never let the one armed Chavez of the hook. This Morales beat Manny at 130. Imo Morales went off the cliff in that fight and the Zahir fight sustained that for me.

I dont know, I think EM was not motivated in that Zahir fight. He turned up the heat in the end and dominated but way too late to win a decision. I think he was done in, in the second fight with Pac. The third fight he seem to know he was no longer up to the pace Pac would set.

Fair enough. I think Morales killing himself to make 122 caved him in at 130.

[Julius Rain]

Thinking about it, I realize none of these guys got sparked out like Pac did. Pac got stopped three times, two by less accomplished fighter and one by one of the greatest counter punchers after going at it for 40 + rounds.

Having said that I guess nobody went at it as hard as Pac did. With the most guts and glory, I think pac takes this hands down. Dude took on Mab, JMM and Em in order. Sure he went 1-1-1 but who the heck does that? I miss that golden era, Pac sporting Fearless logo with the flame shorts. LEGEND!

[erics44]

Naz
Pac
Barrera
Marquez
Moralez

[erics44]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

the fact that people who are also the voters are so happy that Naz is in last , deems the results of the "poll" unreliable on the basis that the opinions of the votes are less than objective