Re: Broner VS Matthysse, who wins and why?
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
You beat Matthysse with legs. From what we've seen, Broner doesn't use much lateral movement.
Although this is a good match up, I don't really understand why Broner would take it. Why doesn't he fight someone in the lower part of the top ten first. Showtime is paying him good money to fight guys without big names. Why not continuing fighting those level guys while he rebuilds himself? He hasn't exactly looked fantastic against Molina and Taylor. Fun though. Why risk it with Matthysse? Why not fight another tune up or something and then get bigger money against Garcia, where, even if he loses, it won't be as punishing?
I don't think Broner likes life at the bottom. He figures he could do what Garcia did and beat Lucas easy. Catapulting himself back to the top where he can make comparisons between himself and floyd again. Broner has fast hands when wants to and maybe in his mind, he forgets that he has to plant his feet with that very wide stance for those flurries. From what i've seen against taylor, Broner is always open for that extra straight over the top. Whenever there was exchanges, he stood there at the end.. (almost like he cant wait to start mugging for the camera or something) and got his head snapped back for it. If Team Matthysse push lucas to "be first and be last" on those exchanges and broners confidence will drop quick and he'll look for a way out. like he did against Maidana.
They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.
Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003
Bookmarks