Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 82

Thread: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Ummm....hmmm. Thinking. Still thinking.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,726
    Mentioned
    1671 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Brewster
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    572
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    A far better question is "When was the last time Wladimir Klitschko fought a bum??"

    To see the last bum fight of Wladimir Klitschko, you have to cast your gaze all the way back to the year 2001, nearly 14 years and 29 opponents ago!

    The opponent was Charles Shufford. who at time of bout was 17-1 (a decent opponent at the time) and 234lbs (bigger and stronger than any opponent of the 70's).

    Shufford was probably more famous for playing Foreman in the movie Ali which is remarked on by commentary as being humourous considering Shufford is much larger than the real Big Geroge nayway. a sign of the times.

    Stewards comments regarding Wladimir were also interesting given he was not even WK's trainer yet.

    Worth a look at this bum fight of Klitschko's...



    Then please compare a Klitschko era "bum" to a "bum" from the past.

    MAx_Power 101:

    "Bums of the Klitschko era > Top opponents of pre80's eras"
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    625
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    The last bum was Shufford? And it took 6 rounds to stop a bum? Well, you said it not us!

    I stopped after the first round- I can’t think of any fighters I like who are tentative against the bums they fought.

    So Wlad fought Leapai—who just lost to Malik Scott- who lost to Chisora LOL!

    Then there was Povetkin who Teddy Atlas kept away from Klitschko until they were forced to fight him (7 plus years to get his first title shot at age 34?) that’s not protecting a fighter? so much for his own trainer thinking he was a superb boxer

    Francesco Pianeta ? I saw his fight with Robert Teuber- his legs are spread way too far, he doesn’t fight tall, even though he is like 6'5 he got smalle when throwing & this guy is superb?

    Wach has fought the same guys everyone else is fighting, Tye Fields, Kevin McBride, Travis Walker. Not saying they are bums at all, but How can I call them quality fighters either?!

    Tony Thompson is good for ESPN fights, but c’mon man, Tony is a world class fighter? After losing to Pulev, he lost to some dude named Carlos Takam, so what Takam is a superb fighter also?

    And if we say yesteryear’s HW’s are todays CW’s then how does that sound, then turn around and call a former CW in Mormeck a world class fighter…who is a legit HW? And the dude is what? 43 years old?
    He got a shot at Wlad for beating Vinny Maddalone? An ESPN fighter who you can see fight at Chicago UIC Pavillion for about $15 a ticket. Oh & he fought Fres Oquendo a 42 year old fighter who hasn’t been ranked top ten since Bobby Brown and Whitney Houstan were married.

    David Haye…man according to Wlad…David Hay talked his way to the title..I agree.

    Sam Peters is the only legit HW I can see so far. He was a legit threat, Heavy handed fighter. One dimensional, but he had swagger and Wlad beat the swagger out of him. Legit win IMO 100%

    Eddie Chambers is an overachiever, fat, unmotivated, but pretty skilled. I’d say a legit win.

    Chagaev barely won a decsion over John Ruiz, and fought about as scary against Valuev as Haye did…so who did he beat to get a title shot? Oh, Povetkin.

    Then there is Rahman who got a lucky payday against Lennox and has never beat a top tier fighter since. Had Lennox beat Rahman, who would Rahman have claimed he beat of noteworthy to NOT be called a BUM on Wlad’s resume? Oh, Monte Barret, the guy Valuev beat like a ragdoll.

    Ibrigamov? Not sure, I think he was average, but losing to Wlad made him quit. I credit Wlad for that.

    Brewster is a pretty good gatekeeper and can stop a guy who isnt on their best.
    Ray Austin wasn't shit.
    Calvin Brock was a heavy handed fighter with little skills, BUT Wlad proved him a pretender not a contender, good job.

    That leaves me with Chris Byrd and once again Sam Peter. Not Wlad's fault he has dominated in a weak era.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    933
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    He has no grade A beef. Not one in the bunch. The best guy he beat was Calvin Brock prior to Povetkin. He could not even get retribution over the janitors, cab drivers and part time golf pros that knocked him out. His brother did. Wlads been on his back more times then an 18th century hooker., heaven forbid that he actually fought a heavyweight with any skill that enjoyed taking chances.

    If anything shows how lame this division is, its the beefed up fraudulent coddled 0's on the win/loss record of his talentless list of adversaries. Haye was a total let down even with his talent. They should have brought him to the ring in a baby carriage. Its not any great wonder how these Pulev's, Pianetas and Wachs of the world remained undefeated. If they are that vacant of any boxing ability what must the rest of the fold look like? Guys like Ron Lyle would dominate all these chronically unemployed turned boxers. Its like watching the trees in my back yard go at it.

    Wlads not responsible for the supply but it is what it is. It will be a much more competitive division when Wlads gone and that's not because Wlad is so good I'm sorry to say.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    572
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    He has no grade A beef. Not one in the bunch. The best guy he beat was Calvin Brock prior to Povetkin. He could not even get retribution over the janitors, cab drivers and part time golf pros that knocked him out. His brother did. Wlads been on his back more times then an 18th century hooker., heaven forbid that he actually fought a heavyweight with any skill that enjoyed taking chances.

    If anything shows how lame this division is, its the beefed up fraudulent coddled 0's on the win/loss record of his talentless list of adversaries. Haye was a total let down even with his talent. They should have brought him to the ring in a baby carriage. Its not any great wonder how these Pulev's, Pianetas and Wachs of the world remained undefeated. If they are that vacant of any boxing ability what must the rest of the fold look like? Guys like Ron Lyle would dominate all these chronically unemployed turned boxers. Its like watching the trees in my back yard go at it.

    Wlads not responsible for the supply but it is what it is. It will be a much more competitive division when Wlads gone and that's not because Wlad is so good I'm sorry to say.
    And there you have the real reason for the disrespect/bummification of the Klitshcko era folks, straight from the horses mouth!

    While Wladimir is here, the era is devoid of talent, all worthless opponents who can scarcely box. But as soon as he's gone, everything will suddenly be better again. As soon as he's gone.

    Fancy that ey! LOL

    Sounds like a case of sour grapes if I ever heard one. As I've always said. The moves are already being put in place now to suddenly "revive" the quality of the HW division as soon as the big fella retires. Disgusting!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    661
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    He has no grade A beef. Not one in the bunch. The best guy he beat was Calvin Brock prior to Povetkin. He could not even get retribution over the janitors, cab drivers and part time golf pros that knocked him out. His brother did. Wlads been on his back more times then an 18th century hooker., heaven forbid that he actually fought a heavyweight with any skill that enjoyed taking chances.

    If anything shows how lame this division is, its the beefed up fraudulent coddled 0's on the win/loss record of his talentless list of adversaries. Haye was a total let down even with his talent. They should have brought him to the ring in a baby carriage. Its not any great wonder how these Pulev's, Pianetas and Wachs of the world remained undefeated. If they are that vacant of any boxing ability what must the rest of the fold look like? Guys like Ron Lyle would dominate all these chronically unemployed turned boxers. Its like watching the trees in my back yard go at it.

    Wlads not responsible for the supply but it is what it is. It will be a much more competitive division when Wlads gone and that's not because Wlad is so good I'm sorry to say.
    And there you have the real reason for the disrespect/bummification of the Klitshcko era folks, straight from the horses mouth!

    While Wladimir is here, the era is devoid of talent, all worthless opponents who can scarcely box. But as soon as he's gone, everything will suddenly be better again. As soon as he's gone.

    Fancy that ey! LOL

    Sounds like a case of sour grapes if I ever heard one. As I've always said. The moves are already being put in place now to suddenly "revive" the quality of the HW division as soon as the big fella retires. Disgusting!

    I don't think he's bashing Wlad at all. Hes saying Wlads the only one with any boxing skills and the divison will see better fights once hes gone due to the playing field being leveled out for the bums.
    “Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it.”
    - George Foreman

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    572
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    The last bum was Shufford? And it took 6 rounds to stop a bum? Well, you said it not us!

    I stopped after the first round- I can’t think of any fighters I like who are tentative against the bums they fought.
    The Shufford fight was nothing less than an outstanding performance from Klitschko as noted by Merchant, Steward and all the commentary. Only an agenda driven moron could not see that.

    Yeah Wlad took 6 rounds to stop a 234lb bum, remember that. Tentative=smart.

    If I remember rightly straight off top of my head, Muhammad Ali took longer to stop a 180lb bum who basically knocked him out the previous round and had to cheat to survive. He then LOST to a green 190lb bum which he later avenged only by decision too. Luckily.

    So Wlad fought Leapai—who just lost to Malik Scott- who lost to Chisora LOL!
    Alex Leapai 30-6 (30-4 going in with Klitschko)
    Malik Scott 37-2 (Undefeated going in with Chisora)
    Dereck Chisora 20-5

    All very high quality opponents.

    Then there was Povetkin who Teddy Atlas kept away from Klitschko until they were forced to fight him (7 plus years to get his first title shot at age 34?) that’s not protecting a fighter? so much for his own trainer thinking he was a superb boxer
    Undefeated and never knocked down in over 300 fights ammy+pro combined.

    Francesco Pianeta ? I saw his fight with Robert Teuber- his legs are spread way too far, he doesn’t fight tall, even though he is like 6'5 he got smalle when throwing & this guy is superb?
    Never said he was superb. I just said he was a quality opponent. Undefeated, very strong.

    Wach has fought the same guys everyone else is fighting, Tye Fields, Kevin McBride, Travis Walker. Not saying they are bums at all, but How can I call them quality fighters either?!
    You can call them quality fighters by comparing them to the champs opponents opponents of previous eras. Guys like Fields, McBride and Walker are several notches above champs opponents opponents of the past. Just a tad lol

    Tony Thompson is good for ESPN fights, but c’mon man, Tony is a world class fighter? After losing to Pulev, he lost to some dude named Carlos Takam, so what Takam is a superb fighter also?
    Tony IS a world class fighter, that is the only way to define him. He fought closely with Pulev who is also a world class fighter and loss to Takam, another superb boxer, yes that's right! Your catching on

    And if we say yesteryear’s HW’s are todays CW’s then how does that sound, then turn around and call a former CW in Mormeck a world class fighter…who is a legit HW? And the dude is what? 43 years old?
    Yesterdays HW's were todays CWs because they were either sub 200lbs at weigh in or around 210lbs or so which is what CWs today weigh at fight night. When Mormeck fought Klitschko he was 217lbs or approximately the same size as prime George Foreman except much more athletic!

    He got a shot at Wlad for beating Vinny Maddalone? An ESPN fighter who you can see fight at Chicago UIC Pavillion for about $15 a ticket. Oh & he fought Fres Oquendo a 42 year old fighter who hasn’t been ranked top ten since Bobby Brown and Whitney Houstan were married.
    Previous champs opponents (Ali, Holmes, Louis etc) got shots against the champ by LOSING fights or by beating a string of bums, sometimes even cruiser bums! Rendering your point here particularly ridiculous! It's never been more stringent to get a shot at the champ! Anyway, Mormeck got his chance because he was a decorated multiple world CW champ, a bit like the Spinks brothers getting there HW title shots don't you think Except Leon was a green bum cruiser whereas Mormeck was a veteran quality HW at fight.

    David Haye…man according to Wlad…David Hay talked his way to the title..I agree.
    Fight hype. Everybody wanted to see Haye vs Klitschko and Wlad knew it. Haye was among Wladimir's best opponents.

    Sam Peters is the only legit HW I can see so far. He was a legit threat, Heavy handed fighter. One dimensional, but he had swagger and Wlad beat the swagger out of him. Legit win IMO 100%
    Agree.

    Eddie Chambers is an overachiever, fat, unmotivated, but pretty skilled. I’d say a legit win.
    Eddie Chambers is a defensive master of escapology and among the fastest HW boxers of all time.

    Chagaev barely won a decsion over John Ruiz, and fought about as scary against Valuev as Haye did…so who did he beat to get a title shot? Oh, Povetkin.
    Chagaev is an outstanding boxer who was HW champion of the world. Ruiz was also a former champion as was Valuev. And yeah it's a little hard for ANY boxer to fight scary vs Valuev who stands 7' tall and weighs 320lbs! Dummy! LOL

    Then there is Rahman who got a lucky payday against Lennox and has never beat a top tier fighter since. Had Lennox beat Rahman, who would Rahman have claimed he beat of noteworthy to NOT be called a BUM on Wlad’s resume? Oh, Monte Barret, the guy Valuev beat like a ragdoll.
    Rahman, Former champ 2 time, mightily strong, wins over Berbick, Sanders & Lewis, robbed against Tua, unusual stoppage from haematoma vs Holyfield, drew with Toney, solid record, yeah, quality opponent!

    Ibrigamov? Not sure, I think he was average, but losing to Wlad made him quit. I credit Wlad for that.
    If you call bashing Briggs and Holyfield average and basically retiring rich after Wladimir because there was little else he had to prove, he had been HW champ, then your call. I would say, quality opponent!

    Brewster is a pretty good gatekeeper and can stop a guy who isnt on their best.
    Brewster was a great American champ, quality opponent, SuperFrazier.

    Ray Austin wasn't shit.
    Correct.

    Calvin Brock was a heavy handed fighter with little skills, BUT Wlad proved him a pretender not a contender, good job.
    Brock was good skills, Wladimir simply shut him down with unbelievably good skills.

    That leaves me with Chris Byrd and once again Sam Peter. Not Wlad's fault he has dominated in a weak era.
    Chris Byrd, another defensive master and among the fastest boxers ever, another former champ with solid record, and PEter, feared puncher, solid record. Quality opponents.

    In all of boxing history there is only a single resume that stands in competition and that is the resume of Lennox Lewis. Wladimir's resume outshines any other boxers resume so brightly it's like brown dwarf star companion lost in the glare of a blue supergiant (Wlad).

    Fact!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    572
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Quote Originally Posted by Maravilla2012 View Post


    I don't think he's bashing Wlad at all. Hes saying Wlads the only one with any boxing skills and the divison will see better fights once hes gone due to the playing field being leveled out for the bums.
    Yes he did. It's clear what he is doing.

    He clearly added it's "it's not because Wlad is so good".

    Since they all look good when they are not fighting Wlad, the move will be made to call it a great era again and "Wlad would have been knocked out these days" and it'll be exactly as I called it.

    Especially if the champ happens to be American, especially if the champ happens to be black. A british champ would be tolerable.

    Sorry but a White Slav is possibly the worst combination for public relations purposes LOL
    Last edited by Max Power; 12-27-2014 at 08:36 AM.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    933
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Empirical evidence = observation, experience and repeatability. That is how facts are established. The facts in this case speak for themselves. Bickering changes nothing.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    572
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Empirical evidence = observation, experience and repeatability. That is how facts are established. The facts in this case speak for themselves. Bickering changes nothing.
    Unfortuantely empirical evidence strictly is unobtainable without a time machine here.

    There is a landslide of circumstantial stuff however which goes more than a long way to show truth.

    In fact much of natural science is based on it, even in physics where the more extreme realms have grown way beyond direct testing now.

    Discussion has always been a major piece in the pursuit of knowledge.

    And in fact the science sect (Max Powerism) vs the religious sect (the Nostalgist/OTNB) was the most pivotal moment in the history of knowledge and is still evident in spots today like for instance the holding up of stem cell progress by the religious sect which can ensure the quality of life and save the lives of millions of people. The sports health depends on your very eradication from it! lol
    Last edited by Max Power; 12-27-2014 at 08:33 AM.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,726
    Mentioned
    1671 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    you will be a otnb one day.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    572
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    you will be a otnb one day.
    Never!

    I will be more like a Lennox Lewis and Vitali Klitschko and know when my time is up, than an Ali or a Louis and make a fool of myself.

    I am aware that the odds are in the future, there will arise boxers who are sufficiently equipped to deal with my days best. It's just how it is.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    627
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Max you make me feel sad. Like none of this is about boxing but rather your need for attention.

    The reason I say this is because this era does have big strong heavyweights but you would have to know absolutely nothing of the sport to not see the great majority are lacking in the ability to fight. Some may have a good jab or a powerful straight right but someone that moves and punches like they born to fight is lacking. And it's obvious.

    I agree WK deserves the credit of an all-time great. For some reason people have a hard time giving credit to someone who shows a weakness then improves to cover that weakness. It's baffling. It should be what real boxing fans like to see most, like Manny developing a right hand it changed him completely as a fighter. But it seems fandom is more about deciding on a fighter and then arguing your case until death. Ignoring all changes of circumstances.

    Fact is Wladimir is great and he takes on the best guys available. There are many big strong fighters but there aren't many natural fighters. Wladimir deserves as much credit as anyone that dominates their era though.
    Last edited by Ron Swanson; 12-27-2014 at 07:50 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    625
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "quality" opponents Wlad "fought"

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    The last bum was Shufford? And it took 6 rounds to stop a bum? Well, you said it not us!

    I stopped after the first round- I can’t think of any fighters I like who are tentative against the bums they fought.
    The Shufford fight was nothing less than an outstanding performance from Klitschko as noted by Merchant, Steward and all the commentary. Only an agenda driven moron could not see that.

    Yeah Wlad took 6 rounds to stop a 234lb bum, remember that. Tentative=smart.

    If I remember rightly straight off top of my head, Muhammad Ali took longer to stop a 180lb bum who basically knocked him out the previous round and had to cheat to survive. He then LOST to a green 190lb bum which he later avenged only by decision too. Luckily.

    So Wlad fought Leapai—who just lost to Malik Scott- who lost to Chisora LOL!
    Alex Leapai 30-6 (30-4 going in with Klitschko)
    Malik Scott 37-2 (Undefeated going in with Chisora)
    Dereck Chisora 20-5

    All very high quality opponents.

    Then there was Povetkin who Teddy Atlas kept away from Klitschko until they were forced to fight him (7 plus years to get his first title shot at age 34?) that’s not protecting a fighter? so much for his own trainer thinking he was a superb boxer
    Undefeated and never knocked down in over 300 fights ammy+pro combined.

    Francesco Pianeta ? I saw his fight with Robert Teuber- his legs are spread way too far, he doesn’t fight tall, even though he is like 6'5 he got smalle when throwing & this guy is superb?
    Never said he was superb. I just said he was a quality opponent. Undefeated, very strong.

    Wach has fought the same guys everyone else is fighting, Tye Fields, Kevin McBride, Travis Walker. Not saying they are bums at all, but How can I call them quality fighters either?!
    You can call them quality fighters by comparing them to the champs opponents opponents of previous eras. Guys like Fields, McBride and Walker are several notches above champs opponents opponents of the past. Just a tad lol

    Tony Thompson is good for ESPN fights, but c’mon man, Tony is a world class fighter? After losing to Pulev, he lost to some dude named Carlos Takam, so what Takam is a superb fighter also?
    Tony IS a world class fighter, that is the only way to define him. He fought closely with Pulev who is also a world class fighter and loss to Takam, another superb boxer, yes that's right! Your catching on

    And if we say yesteryear’s HW’s are todays CW’s then how does that sound, then turn around and call a former CW in Mormeck a world class fighter…who is a legit HW? And the dude is what? 43 years old?
    Yesterdays HW's were todays CWs because they were either sub 200lbs at weigh in or around 210lbs or so which is what CWs today weigh at fight night. When Mormeck fought Klitschko he was 217lbs or approximately the same size as prime George Foreman except much more athletic!

    He got a shot at Wlad for beating Vinny Maddalone? An ESPN fighter who you can see fight at Chicago UIC Pavillion for about $15 a ticket. Oh & he fought Fres Oquendo a 42 year old fighter who hasn’t been ranked top ten since Bobby Brown and Whitney Houstan were married.
    Previous champs opponents (Ali, Holmes, Louis etc) got shots against the champ by LOSING fights or by beating a string of bums, sometimes even cruiser bums! Rendering your point here particularly ridiculous! It's never been more stringent to get a shot at the champ! Anyway, Mormeck got his chance because he was a decorated multiple world CW champ, a bit like the Spinks brothers getting there HW title shots don't you think Except Leon was a green bum cruiser whereas Mormeck was a veteran quality HW at fight.

    David Haye…man according to Wlad…David Hay talked his way to the title..I agree.
    Fight hype. Everybody wanted to see Haye vs Klitschko and Wlad knew it. Haye was among Wladimir's best opponents.

    Sam Peters is the only legit HW I can see so far. He was a legit threat, Heavy handed fighter. One dimensional, but he had swagger and Wlad beat the swagger out of him. Legit win IMO 100%
    Agree.

    Eddie Chambers is an overachiever, fat, unmotivated, but pretty skilled. I’d say a legit win.
    Eddie Chambers is a defensive master of escapology and among the fastest HW boxers of all time.

    Chagaev barely won a decsion over John Ruiz, and fought about as scary against Valuev as Haye did…so who did he beat to get a title shot? Oh, Povetkin.
    Chagaev is an outstanding boxer who was HW champion of the world. Ruiz was also a former champion as was Valuev. And yeah it's a little hard for ANY boxer to fight scary vs Valuev who stands 7' tall and weighs 320lbs! Dummy! LOL

    Then there is Rahman who got a lucky payday against Lennox and has never beat a top tier fighter since. Had Lennox beat Rahman, who would Rahman have claimed he beat of noteworthy to NOT be called a BUM on Wlad’s resume? Oh, Monte Barret, the guy Valuev beat like a ragdoll.
    Rahman, Former champ 2 time, mightily strong, wins over Berbick, Sanders & Lewis, robbed against Tua, unusual stoppage from haematoma vs Holyfield, drew with Toney, solid record, yeah, quality opponent!

    Ibrigamov? Not sure, I think he was average, but losing to Wlad made him quit. I credit Wlad for that.
    If you call bashing Briggs and Holyfield average and basically retiring rich after Wladimir because there was little else he had to prove, he had been HW champ, then your call. I would say, quality opponent!

    Brewster is a pretty good gatekeeper and can stop a guy who isnt on their best.
    Brewster was a great American champ, quality opponent, SuperFrazier.

    Ray Austin wasn't shit.
    Correct.

    Calvin Brock was a heavy handed fighter with little skills, BUT Wlad proved him a pretender not a contender, good job.
    Brock was good skills, Wladimir simply shut him down with unbelievably good skills.

    That leaves me with Chris Byrd and once again Sam Peter. Not Wlad's fault he has dominated in a weak era.
    Chris Byrd, another defensive master and among the fastest boxers ever, another former champ with solid record, and PEter, feared puncher, solid record. Quality opponents.

    In all of boxing history there is only a single resume that stands in competition and that is the resume of Lennox Lewis. Wladimir's resume outshines any other boxers resume so brightly it's like brown dwarf star companion lost in the glare of a blue supergiant (Wlad).

    Fact!
    Only an agenda driven moron could not see that.

    Well must be the whole website, because you are the only one harping this made-up madness.
    Like you said 99 out of 100 people call red... blue..and you are the only sensible one at Saddo to see the true color for what it is. You, sir are the hapless ass-out moron. A second city t.v skit drivin moron who cant get his point across without throwing names, tantrum driven-agenda-based-moron.
    Now carry on thinking everything you say about today's HW's is God-truth. Why not create an alter ego to have someone to agree with you...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-10-2013, 02:02 AM
  2. Replies: 127
    Last Post: 04-24-2010, 09:20 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 09:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing