Lucas Browne vs Tyson Fury

[Max Power]

I've never seen Tyson Fury take on a tall, really big and aggressive HW yet with a hard punch.

Considering Browne and Fury are both undefeated ranked HW's of similar experience, I think it would be a competitive fight and even a great fight, action filled from start to finish.

Brown smashed the hefty, 6'8" hard hitting Towers who had quick hands and fundamentally good jab and straight right, he could box. So we know he can handle opponents of this scale.

The question is, is Fury special enough to stop Browne from doing it to him too. I think Fury is certainly better than Towers, Fury puts together combinations and moves much more fluidly.

Who you guys got Interesting match!

[ross]

I've never seen Tyson Fury take on a tall, really big and aggressive HW yet with a hard punch.

Considering Browne and Fury are both undefeated ranked HW's of similar experience, I think it would be a competitive fight and even a great fight, action filled from start to finish.

Brown smashed the hefty, 6'8" hard hitting Towers who had quick hands and fundamentally good jab and straight right, he could box. So we know he can handle opponents of this scale.

The question is, is Fury special enough to stop Browne from doing it to him too. I think Fury is certainly better than Towers, Fury puts together combinations and moves much more fluidly.

Who you guys got Interesting match!

Brown os treading water at the moment with regards to level of opposition. He's not going anywhere. He will make a high profile win for someone soon though.

He looked crap against a fat old Toney. He actually got hurt in that fight and outworked!

[Max Power]

I've never seen Tyson Fury take on a tall, really big and aggressive HW yet with a hard punch.

Considering Browne and Fury are both undefeated ranked HW's of similar experience, I think it would be a competitive fight and even a great fight, action filled from start to finish.

Brown smashed the hefty, 6'8" hard hitting Towers who had quick hands and fundamentally good jab and straight right, he could box. So we know he can handle opponents of this scale.

The question is, is Fury special enough to stop Browne from doing it to him too. I think Fury is certainly better than Towers, Fury puts together combinations and moves much more fluidly.

Who you guys got Interesting match!

Brown os treading water at the moment with regards to level of opposition. He's not going anywhere. He will make a high profile win for someone soon though.

He looked crap against a fat old Toney. He actually got hurt in that fight and outworked!

What? His competition isn't much worse than Fury's, if at all, they are about comparable.

Fat old Toney? Yeah, Toney ain't the same Toney but he's still James Toney. NOBODY has ever looked really good against James Toney, he is skilfully an awesome boxer.

And you know how I feel about dissing fat boxers. Performance is the ONLY thing that matters.

The ring girls are where to look for aesthetic appeal.

[nuggetdotcom]

I've never seen Tyson Fury take on a tall, really big and aggressive HW yet with a hard punch.

Considering Browne and Fury are both undefeated ranked HW's of similar experience, I think it would be a competitive fight and even a great fight, action filled from start to finish.

Brown smashed the hefty, 6'8" hard hitting Towers who had quick hands and fundamentally good jab and straight right, he could box. So we know he can handle opponents of this scale.

The question is, is Fury special enough to stop Browne from doing it to him too. I think Fury is certainly better than Towers, Fury puts together combinations and moves much more fluidly.

Who you guys got Interesting match!

Brown os treading water at the moment with regards to level of opposition. He's not going anywhere. He will make a high profile win for someone soon though.

He looked crap against a fat old Toney. He actually got hurt in that fight and outworked!

What? His competition isn't much worse than Fury's, if at all, they are about comparable.

Fat old Toney? Yeah, Toney ain't the same Toney but he's still James Toney. NOBODY has ever looked really good against James Toney, he is skilfully an awesome boxer.

And you know how I feel about dissing fat boxers. Performance is the ONLY thing that matters.

The ring girls are where to look for aesthetic appeal.

Lucas Browne and Tyson Fury are about equal in skills, fairground to middling, they wont fight in the short term because both their promoters think they can get them a big money fight with a champion or contender to retire on, neither are in it for the long term because they are both media freaks, with Tyson doing better at bullshit.

[Max Power]

I've never seen Tyson Fury take on a tall, really big and aggressive HW yet with a hard punch.

Considering Browne and Fury are both undefeated ranked HW's of similar experience, I think it would be a competitive fight and even a great fight, action filled from start to finish.

Brown smashed the hefty, 6'8" hard hitting Towers who had quick hands and fundamentally good jab and straight right, he could box. So we know he can handle opponents of this scale.

The question is, is Fury special enough to stop Browne from doing it to him too. I think Fury is certainly better than Towers, Fury puts together combinations and moves much more fluidly.

Who you guys got Interesting match!

Brown os treading water at the moment with regards to level of opposition. He's not going anywhere. He will make a high profile win for someone soon though.

He looked crap against a fat old Toney. He actually got hurt in that fight and outworked!

What? His competition isn't much worse than Fury's, if at all, they are about comparable.

Fat old Toney? Yeah, Toney ain't the same Toney but he's still James Toney. NOBODY has ever looked really good against James Toney, he is skilfully an awesome boxer.

And you know how I feel about dissing fat boxers. Performance is the ONLY thing that matters.

The ring girls are where to look for aesthetic appeal.

Lucas Browne and Tyson Fury are about equal in skills, fairground to middling, they wont fight in the short term because both their promoters think they can get them a big money fight with a champion or contender to retire on, neither are in it for the long term because they are both media freaks, with Tyson doing better at bullshit.

Haha, agreed.

[Vendettos]

I've never seen Tyson Fury take on a tall, really big and aggressive HW yet with a hard punch.

Considering Browne and Fury are both undefeated ranked HW's of similar experience, I think it would be a competitive fight and even a great fight, action filled from start to finish.

Brown smashed the hefty, 6'8" hard hitting Towers who had quick hands and fundamentally good jab and straight right, he could box. So we know he can handle opponents of this scale.

The question is, is Fury special enough to stop Browne from doing it to him too. I think Fury is certainly better than Towers, Fury puts together combinations and moves much more fluidly.

Who you guys got Interesting match!

Brown os treading water at the moment with regards to level of opposition. He's not going anywhere. He will make a high profile win for someone soon though.

He looked crap against a fat old Toney. He actually got hurt in that fight and outworked!

TBH though @ross, (and remember I have been a bit more flattering to Fury recently) he has seemingly avoided big guys who can really bang.

However he did accept a fight with Haye, who is up there with the hardest punchers in boxing currently, so I do give him respect there but I'd like to see him take on a Lucas Browne, David Price, Deonty Wilder or Chris Arreola.

Lets see how he does after Christian Hammer, now Hammer is another very small guy compared to Fury, infact he is smaller height wise than Cunningham and he is not ever in good shape.

Tune up fight probably.

[Silkeyjoe]

Fury should fight someone like Browne but its pretty clear hes being steered away from big fighters who can punch. He avoided Price for the same reason. Im not saying Fury would lose these but they are obviously seen as too big a risk at this stage. It will ultimately be his downfall when he gets pasted by Wlad.

[ross]

Fury should fight someone like Browne but its pretty clear hes being steered away from big fighters who can punch. He avoided Price for the same reason. Im not saying Fury would lose these but they are obviously seen as too big a risk at this stage. It will ultimately be his downfall when he gets pasted by Wlad.

All this shit about Brown.

Tell me his best win. What fight has he looked impressive in?

Hatton wont let him fight anyone dangerous. Whereas the Furys tried making fights with Haye and Wilder.

Is Brown more dangerous than Haye?

Fucking morons in here sometimes.

[Silkeyjoe]

Fury should fight someone like Browne but its pretty clear hes being steered away from big fighters who can punch. He avoided Price for the same reason. Im not saying Fury would lose these but they are obviously seen as too big a risk at this stage. It will ultimately be his downfall when he gets pasted by Wlad.

All this shit about Brown.

Tell me his best win. What fight has he looked impressive in?

Hatton wont let him fight anyone dangerous. Whereas the Furys tried making fights with Haye and Wilder.

Is Brown more dangerous than Haye?

Fucking morons in here sometimes.

His power has been impressive. He is certainly more dangerous then Hammer and the other guys Fury has been fighting.

No he is not more dangerous then Haye, but Fury didnt fight Haye and Fury wont get 7 figs to fight Browne which is why it is too big a risk. IF Haye KOs Fury, Fury stock goes way down and will have a hard time building himself up again. Ah well at least he got paid a few mil. If he looses to Brown his stock goes even further down and he will have got paid fuck all. Does this not make sense to you you thick f@%k?