Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  1
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    924
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    617
    Cool Clicks

    Default Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    How do you think Golovkin would have done in the late 80s-early 90s MW division? Against the likes of:

    McCallum
    Toney
    Jones
    Hopkins
    Kalambay

    Could he hold his own?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    He could hold his own but I wouldn't pick him to beat any of those guys, other than maybe Kalambay.
    David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,900
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    837
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Had they fought, how many times would Bernard have touched GGG's junk en route to his foul filled and boring UD decision?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,355
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1333
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Toney would have been in a phone-booth all night so GGG might have been able to manipulate Toney's hands enough to land (or as misdirection to land) more often that you think, but admittedly that's a bit of a fanciful thought.

    Kalambay I honestly haven't seen fight enough to know eitherway.

    Hopkins and MacCallum are ATG so it's far too early to say but seriously doubt GGG would beat a prime version of either of those. McCallum wasn't 100% consistent but I'm not giving GGG an inch on that one.

    Jones, no chance. Would be hilarious to watch - For a guy who uses his eyes as defence, with reflexes as good as they were, GGG would be utterly bamboozled.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Toney would have been in a phone-booth all night so GGG might have been able to manipulate Toney's hands enough to land (or as misdirection to land) more often that you think, but admittedly that's a bit of a fanciful thought.
    If we're talking 160-168 though, James could move and box with the best of them, and I don't think there's any way GGG gets the best of him on the inside.

    James was just as good or better than Bhop when he was on. Obviously he never had Bhop's disicpline though
    David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,355
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1333
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Toney would have been in a phone-booth all night so GGG might have been able to manipulate Toney's hands enough to land (or as misdirection to land) more often that you think, but admittedly that's a bit of a fanciful thought.
    If we're talking 160-168 though, James could move and box with the best of them, and I don't think there's any way GGG gets the best of him on the inside.

    James was just as good or better than Bhop when he was on. Obviously he never had Bhop's disicpline though
    The way I see it, if GGG is coming and cutting the ring off, Toney would decide to show him how 'old skool ' he is and attempt to bust GGG up on the inside in an all out war. I haven't a clue if GGG would be up to that test yet (I doubt it presently), but I see some of the things from GGG that might have short-circuited Toneys adjustment.

    Fanciful, but just sayin.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    24,896
    Mentioned
    946 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1315
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    There seems to be a gulf but to be fair to Golovkin he has dealt with everything put in front of him in both amateur and pro careers so far. This is the trouble with mythical matches. Hell he could go up and match Ward scraping out a narrow points win on workrate, however unlikely that seems, and it still wouldn't answer the question. There are not the opponents available to replicate the ability and styles to make that call.

    I think there is more to come from Golovkin. It's hard to look spectacular or masterful against average opposition. The challenge of stepping out of your comfort zone often does bring out the best in fighters.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    He might have beat all of them.

    This is "era bias" on our part. We think the fighters from the 80/90s are much better than current ones (me too mostly) but it's probably not the case. Just like the fossils think all these great 80/90s fighters were pansies that wouldn't live with the dinosaurs from their time.
    Last edited by Fenster; 07-30-2015 at 02:33 AM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    924
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    617
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    He could have beat all of them.

    This is "era bias" on our part. We think the fighters from the 80/90s are much better than current ones (me too mostly) but it's probably not the case. Just like the fossils think all these great 80/90s fighters were pansies that wouldn't live with the dinosaurs from their time.
    No, I think the 80s-90s MW division was MUCH stronger than the current one.

    Compare

    Toney
    Nunn
    McCallum
    Jones
    Hopkins

    to

    Cotto
    Golovkin
    Geale
    Murray
    Lee

    I'm not saying it was the strongest MW division ever, but it was Murderer's Row compared to the current MW division.
    Last edited by VG_Addict; 07-30-2015 at 12:32 AM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by VG_Addict View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    He could have beat all of them.

    This is "era bias" on our part. We think the fighters from the 80/90s are much better than current ones (me too mostly) but it's probably not the case. Just like the fossils think all these great 80/90s fighters were pansies that wouldn't live with the dinosaurs from their time.
    No, I think the 80s-90s MW division was MUCH stronger than the current one.

    Compare

    Toney
    Nunn
    McCallum
    Jones
    Hopkins

    to

    Cotto
    Golovkin
    Geale
    Murray
    Lee

    I'm not saying it was the strongest MW division ever, but it was Murderer's Row compared to the current MW division.
    Agree. But you've picked guys that established themselves as great fighters over a long period of time in several weight-classes.

    It took Hopkins 10 years to be considered a top fighter, then almost another 10 to be a legend.

    There are other factors as well - the supermiddle division being much stronger now than back in the day.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    This is "era bias" on our part. We think the fighters from the 80/90s are much better than current ones (me too mostly) but it's probably not the case.
    I usually hate "era bias" but I think in this case we've cherry picked 4 guys who are true all time greats and could have been champs in any era.

    And then we are matching them up against a guy who is still largely unproven at MW (not that it's his fault).

    Bernard, Toney and McCallum are legendary fighters, not just top guys of a certain time.

    Roy Jones is in a league of his own. Personally I wouldn't pick anyone from 160-175 in the history of boxing over a prime RJJ.
    David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hollywood, FL
    Posts
    655
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    854
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    He would be on "the contender"

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,480
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    As much as I like GGG, I don't think I could fathom those matchups yet, as we haven't been able to see if he has more than one gear. It remains to be seen whether he is just a Tank that eventually rolls over everything in his path, snuffing them out with hard punches or if he can add finesse to his game and win by design, rather than attrition. I have seen him adapt somewhat during a fight to see punches he's already been hit with but a lot of his ko's have either come while trading or walking down an opponent. The hunter has to become the hunted to reveal his guile.

    At this point its theoretical style and toughness match ups. He could match up well with any raging bull types, where his chin gives him opportunities to trade and target, but with evasive, speedy combo counter punchers like jones, he could track and stalk and get cut to ribbons for his trouble without landing something flush and meaningful the whole fight. The only fight there's maybe an inkling for to me is a toney fight, if we liken GGG to a faster, better conditioned jirov who mixed up body and head punches a little better. Toney still out slicks him, but based on effective aggression and GGG chin so far and toneys reluctance to use his legs, it could go to a decision closer than maybe some think.

    Against hopkins, i just see him popping the kazaks head back when hes moving straight back and tying him up, i wouldn't put it past this fight to end in some kind of controversy where the frustration winds up with hopkins thrown to the floor or rabbit punched and trying to make an easy night of it.
    They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.

    Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,130
    Mentioned
    503 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin in 80s-90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by VG_Addict View Post
    How do you think Golovkin would have done in the late 80s-early 90s MW division? Against the likes of:

    McCallum
    Toney
    Jones
    Hopkins
    Kalambay

    Could he hold his own?
    He'd lose against them all, bar Kalambay

    As I have said before Toney, Hopkins, Jones, McCallum would school the slavic hype job named Triple G. He who dines out on beating the shit outta cab drivers, journeymen and (non title) fighters just to get his stock up but if he were to get in a D'Leoren time machine and get in the ring with real dogs like the fighters the OP mentioned then Triple G would get a brawling azz wooping from them all.

    Triple G fight Ward !! You bitch. Stop calling Money out. He knows a fight against Ward means he wouldn't have any advantages (like weight as he would do with Mayweather) but he ain't calling out Ward because it's not that big of a payday.

    Andre Ward !! That's who that faggot should be calling out, but his puzzy azz is trying to fight small welterweights. He wants to fight Floyd. Why ? It's a Win-Win situation. Should he pull it off ? He'll get 20 goats and six cows or whatever they get in Kazahstan, but in all seriousness. He win's and he's a legend. If he loses ? It won't matter because its Mayweather and everyone loses to Mayweather, not to mention the shitload of money he'll get.

    And even if Floyd beats GGG clearly, people would then say Triple G was weight drained and all Floyd did was run all night. People will then want Floyd to take on cancer next. If he cant find a cure then clearly he cant be TBE.
    Last edited by denilson200; 07-30-2015 at 01:15 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Taylor v Golovkin
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-12-2014, 01:45 AM
  2. Who should Golovkin Fight ?
    By Beanz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-16-2014, 07:14 AM
  3. Next for Golovkin.
    By p4pking in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 11-07-2013, 01:23 AM
  4. Golovkin may come to the UK
    By Beanz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-09-2013, 12:57 AM
  5. Golovkin card
    By armin in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-18-2012, 02:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing