Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    It is ridiculous to expect Golovkin to move down. You know if you're definitely move up 5 more pounds. What's the big deal for canelo.... five pounds? The guy goes into the ring at what 165? Maybe more? Without doing any research I think it's safe to say that the vast majority of the times that people have moved it was to move up to challenge for a higher division.

    There's no question that Canelo needs to move up 5 pounds and there's also no question that Golovkin needs to move up to fight Ward....they're both bunch of chickens both of them useless chickens. This supposed Superstars we have nowadays are just chickens.... look at Archie Moore look at Roy Jones look at Henry Armstrong these were real men willing to fight.
    Last edited by brocktonblockbust; 05-19-2016 at 09:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    583
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    Only difference between the two of them is that GGG wants to unify 160 before moving up which I think is acceptable, Canelo wants to unify 160 without ever actually fighting at 160 and has never mentioned moving up.

    If he was to pull off a major upset and beat GGG at 160 then would there be the same call for him to move up to fight Ward?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,480
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1018
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    And GGG hasn't had trouble making 160. Its fine for you to move down if you can make the weight without posing a health risk to yourself .
    Last edited by J_Undisputed; 05-20-2016 at 01:55 AM.
    They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.

    Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    626
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    2 things

    Batman-GGG has been talking about moving up for 5 years! He was going to move up for a payday against Steiglitz, he was going to move up for a payday against Chavez, he was going to move up for a payday against Froch. All to 168, but for Ward he wanted 164. Let's not pretend we don't understand why one situation called for a different weight, we all know why he wanted Ward to go lower. GGG was 165 12 years ago. 168 isn't a problem now.

    And the 2nd, GGG has already moved down. He was bigger as an amateur.

    He should not have to move down, that is correct. But he also shouldn't Pacquiao and say I'll fight this guy at this weight but for this guy I want it at this weight and that guy I want it at that weight to have an advantage. He is good enough he doesn't need advantages.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    583
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    2 things

    Batman-GGG has been talking about moving up for 5 years! He was going to move up for a payday against Steiglitz, he was going to move up for a payday against Chavez, he was going to move up for a payday against Froch. All to 168, but for Ward he wanted 164. Let's not pretend we don't understand why one situation called for a different weight, we all know why he wanted Ward to go lower. GGG was 165 12 years ago. 168 isn't a problem now.

    And the 2nd, GGG has already moved down. He was bigger as an amateur.

    He should not have to move down, that is correct. But he also shouldn't Pacquiao and say I'll fight this guy at this weight but for this guy I want it at this weight and that guy I want it at that weight to have an advantage. He is good enough he doesn't need advantages.
    Is that true? I honestly can't remember ever hearing him talking about Steiglitz, Chavez and Froch, my memory must be shot

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    Froch would fucking murder him, even now.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    623
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    2 things

    Batman-GGG has been talking about moving up for 5 years! He was going to move up for a payday against Steiglitz, he was going to move up for a payday against Chavez, he was going to move up for a payday against Froch. All to 168, but for Ward he wanted 164. Let's not pretend we don't understand why one situation called for a different weight, we all know why he wanted Ward to go lower. GGG was 165 12 years ago. 168 isn't a problem now.

    And the 2nd, GGG has already moved down. He was bigger as an amateur.

    He should not have to move down, that is correct. But he also shouldn't Pacquiao and say I'll fight this guy at this weight but for this guy I want it at this weight and that guy I want it at that weight to have an advantage. He is good enough he doesn't need advantages.
    Is that true? I honestly can't remember ever hearing him talking about Steiglitz, Chavez and Froch, my memory must be shot
    I was about to ask as well. If it's true, then Ron just dropped some science on us.
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    703
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    950
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    I don't see how losing muscle mass can benefit someone in a sport as grueling as boxing, where even the most seemingly marginal differences can be a big advantage/disadvantage and have aa huge influence on the outcome of a fight.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    932
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: No fighter needs to move down, fighters need to move up!

    Quote Originally Posted by Sleepwalker View Post
    I don't see how losing muscle mass can benefit someone in a sport as grueling as boxing, where even the most seemingly marginal differences can be a big advantage/disadvantage and have aa huge influence on the outcome of a fight.
    It doesn't. If it was not a problem history would be full of examples. Although rarely attempted it also has about a 100% failure rate. Other then that its a great idea.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Dam this a great move.
    By Andre in forum Important / Useful Posts
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 05:38 PM
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-18-2010, 02:24 AM
  3. RJJ'S NEXT MOVE
    By Sugar_Shaw in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-27-2007, 07:42 PM
  4. did hatton move up to WW or something?
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-06-2006, 07:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing