Tyson Fury launches legal case against UK anti doping

[ross]

Basically as I said, it was a negative result.

The second sample was also negative.

UKAD arent bringing any charges because they cant as Tyson hasnt tested positive.

Again, like I said, it was only raised levels which happens naturally with intense training. This was from February 2015 and there has to be someone behind it being brought out now but now UKAD are going to be taken to court for intimating Tyson is a drug cheat.

Hope he hammers em!

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.t...ug-claims/amp/

[Batman]

Good stuff I'm glad he's in the clear

[ross]

I never had any doubt.

All a bit weird, bringing something he didnt even fail up 16 months after the event?

[brocktonblockbust]

This shit should have been mentioned over a year ago

[Master]

Fury should clear his name and leave it at that.

[ross]

Interesting when it was the bullshit story about him, how lots posted but now its been shown to be bullshit everyones quiet

[Dark Lord Al]

As I stated in the original thread , Fury doesn't have the physique of a man who takes roids. Turns out I was right all along.

[superheavyrhun]

As I stated in the original thread , Fury doesn't have the physique of a man who takes roids. Turns out I was right all along.

The natural physique for a "dartist" rather than a boxer maybe!

Fair play though, he's not exactly ripped, but that's not necessarily something that makes him any different as a fighter. Looking forward to his fight in the Autumn with Klitschko, hope he can win again.

[El Kabong]

As I stated in the original thread , Fury doesn't have the physique of a man who takes roids. Turns out I was right all along.

You mean like James Toney's physique?


I don't understand the court case, I mean ross said "there was no failed test" so Fury is suing over what exactly?