Errol Spence Jr.

[GAME]

All these welters are too inactive.

thurmans gone quiet. Spence has taken too long to set up his first defence. Danny Garcia never fights. Brooks fights once a year. Khan hasn't fought in over a year.

what wrong with these guys. Sooner Crawford moves up and cleans out the division the better.

[Master]

Thurman is injured.

Spence needs a rest.

Garcia is hugging his dad.

Khan is divorcing his wife.

[GaMo]

Yeah, they're all wank! Guys like Trinidad, Mosley and De La Hoya
Would smash these guys in their primes in my opinion
Even Quartey and Forrest would've been favoured.

Brook has no heart, Khan has no chin and Garcia looks shot
Thurman, Spence and Porter are decent but need to be more active.

I won't even bother telling you what Leonard
And Hearns would do to these guys

[imp]

Khan is exciting and sells fights.

Garcia doesn't seem to know how to deal with a loss.

Spence needs to hurry up and fight Peterson so he can stay active.

[GaMo]

Khan is exciting and sells fights.

He's only exciting when he's facing a puncher
And the excitement is waiting for him to get caught

[Batman]

Khan is exciting and sells fights.

Garcia doesn't seem to know how to deal with a loss.

Spence needs to hurry up and fight Peterson so he can stay active.

Khan is a...you know what I can't even be bothered to say it anymore...

Khan is irrelevant...that is all

[Primo Carnera]

Khan is an EX-BOXER!

[Alpha]

Brook is better than Thurman IMO.

I second that Brook is a better boxer than Thurman.

You what take Porter away from Kell's record and what's he done?
Not to mention he quit in back to back fights in his own backyard!
Thurman has beaten better and so far he's not lost (let alone quit)

Brook probably wouldn't even beat Khan let alone Thurman
In 13 years and after 38 fights, Brook has one good win on his record
Thurman has had 10 less fights and has already beaten better and done more.

Kell Brook is shit! I know there's a lot of Brits posting on here
But come on guys let's be honest. Kell has fallen far short at elite level.

Brook beat Porter better than Thurman did. Calling him sh-t is ridiculous.

[GaMo]

Brook is better than Thurman IMO.

I second that Brook is a better boxer than Thurman.

You what take Porter away from Kell's record and what's he done?
Not to mention he quit in back to back fights in his own backyard!
Thurman has beaten better and so far he's not lost (let alone quit)

Brook probably wouldn't even beat Khan let alone Thurman
In 13 years and after 38 fights, Brook has one good win on his record
Thurman has had 10 less fights and has already beaten better and done more.

Kell Brook is shit! I know there's a lot of Brits posting on here
But come on guys let's be honest. Kell has fallen far short at elite level.

Brook beat Porter better than Thurman did. Calling him sh-t is ridiculous.

One night and one fight doesn't mean much
Especially when you've quit twice in a row
Brook might not be shit but he's nothing special

[Alpha]

I've never been a big Brook fan but he does have skills.

[powerpuncher]

Brook quit twice in a row for good reason. Both times he was saving his eye from lasting damage. He was tough in both fights though.

Thurman would get beaten within 3 rounds to GGG and he will get stopped if he ever fights Spence. Brook has a better resume than Thurman for sure. Thurman has never fought anyone near the level of GGG or Spence.

Again, I like Thurman and I'm not a huge brook fan, but I definitely see brook winning that fight. I think he is just a better fighter too.

[GaMo]

Brook quit twice in a row for good reason.

There’s never a good reason to quit in a fight
I understand an old fighter giving up
But Brook was a fighter in his prime
Fighting in his own backyard so there’s no excuse.

Both times he was saving his eye from lasting damage.

Look at Margarito, that’s a fighter
Even Malignaggi didn’t quit (vs Cotto)

Brook has a better resume than Thurman for sure. Thurman has never fought anyone near the level of GGG or Spence.

Are you joking? You don’t get credit for getting your ass kicked
If that’s your logic then McGregor has a better resume than both
Because he fought Mayweather.

They both beat Porter but Thurman has beaten Garcia and Guerrero
Who are both better than anyone Brook has beaten.

[Batman]

Brook quit twice in a row for good reason.

There’s never a good reason to quit in a fight
I understand an old fighter giving up
But Brook was a fighter in his prime
Fighting in his own backyard so there’s no excuse.

Both times he was saving his eye from lasting damage.

Look at Margarito, that’s a fighter
Even Malignaggi didn’t quit (vs Cotto)

Brook has a better resume than Thurman for sure. Thurman has never fought anyone near the level of GGG or Spence.

Are you joking? You don’t get credit for getting your ass kicked
If that’s your logic then McGregor has a better resume than both
Because he fought Mayweather.

They both beat Porter but Thurman has beaten Garcia and Guerrero
Who are both better than anyone Brook has beaten.

There is an argument for both sides, brook has faced the better opponents whilst Thurman has beat the better opponents.

The one thing that is nonsense though is saying it is ok for an old fighter to quit but not for a younger fighter.

Brook was concerned about lasting damage to his eyesight, he may have just prolonged his career for a good few years by them fights being stopped when they were.

Just because a fighter is brave doesn't mean they are smart, in fact a lot of the time they are being fucking idiots by fighting on with serious injuries.

[GaMo]

Brook quit twice in a row for good reason.

There’s never a good reason to quit in a fight
I understand an old fighter giving up
But Brook was a fighter in his prime
Fighting in his own backyard so there’s no excuse.

Both times he was saving his eye from lasting damage.

Look at Margarito, that’s a fighter
Even Malignaggi didn’t quit (vs Cotto)

Brook has a better resume than Thurman for sure. Thurman has never fought anyone near the level of GGG or Spence.

Are you joking? You don’t get credit for getting your ass kicked
If that’s your logic then McGregor has a better resume than both
Because he fought Mayweather.

They both beat Porter but Thurman has beaten Garcia and Guerrero
Who are both better than anyone Brook has beaten.

There is an argument for both sides, brook has faced the better opponents whilst Thurman has beat the better opponents.

There is no argument. You don’t get credit for getting beaten
Going by that logic, Eric Molina has the best resume in the heavyweight division
Because he’s fought the top two guys in that weight class.

Brook doesn’t get credit for quitting against Golovkin and Spence
And there’s no doubt Thurman has achieved more in a shorter time
And in less fights. Anyone who argues that is either stupid or bias.

[imp]

Brook will surely campaign at 154 for the rest of his career..if he returns.