An editorial board of the
New York Times (hey those are YOUR PEOPLE Kirk) wrote: "With the decision to label a Fox News television reporter a possible 'co-conspirator' in a criminal investigation of a news leak, the Obama administration has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news."
Dana Milbank of the
Washington Post (more of YOUR PEOPLE Kirk) stated: "The Rosen affair is as flagrant an assault on civil liberties as anything done by George W. Bush’s administration, and it uses technology to silence critics in a way Richard Nixon could only have dreamed of. To treat a reporter as a criminal for doing his job — seeking out information the government doesn’t want made public — deprives Americans of the First Amendment freedom on which all other constitutional rights are based."
Did you miss those days of reading sweetheart? Were you out sick?
And that doesn't even get to the intimidation and downright STASI tactics of how Obama treated the AP and also Kim Strassle....but hey different rules for a different day and a different President.
All of the reports aren't out yet, I assume there will be indictments eventually, feel free to mock and gloat until then.....but if indictments DO come, well don't go begging for mercy
Vindman DID lie under oath and it's proven by his testimony. First off Vindman said "I don't know the whistleblower" and THEN Vindman said he spoke to 2 people about "the call" one of those people was that Less Nessman looking motherfucker George Kent and the other guy he "wouldn't name" and then Rep. Schiff scolded Rep. Jordan for attempting to discern who the whistleblower was. Soooo either you're extremely naive or you don't want to accept that the other person Vindman told was the whistleblower which is quite obvious.
As for your stuff on Sondland...well buddy you really should have watched his testimony, because homeboy got SMOKED.
No soup for you, thanks for playing buh bye
Bookmarks