no I get your point but I don’t think this is a good example to use it on. Pick any of the other fake news bs and it would be acceptable, this particular one is not a good example of anythingI think you're missing my point. But its late now so I'll clarify tomorrow. But once again, for now, I'll just say that yes, the media reporting of the incident was atrocious and not befitting the title of 'journalism'.Wait, they ran a story that was blatantly false and they knew it. They aired a completely fabricated story and the school got death threats and still they are saying the look the kid had on his face was an act of violence. The school got death threats But I agree with u? In my opinion there should be more outrage, this wasn’t the usual political hit piece we are used to in the US this was malicious. It’s a shame people would say no big deal move along.Yep. Exactly what I was saying. Glad you agree.And “some” people continued the story even when the truth was available because it fit with a type of agenda they want to portray. See how it works.No I know. I agree. It was absolutely wrong.did you follow the story, the kid got death threats. Faux outrage? Really. It was blatant misreporting and had an effect on every student at that school. It says a lot about how our media works. It really was shamefulIt's clarified. It's over. Move on.He raised money by claiming he was a Vietnam vet.
I was in the reserves same as him, but I never boast about it. It was just a part-time job, one weekend per month and two evenings a week. It's very easy to at least get promoted to corporal in the reserves.
I'm the same age as Phillips, who like myself is a bit too young to have fought in Vietnam. I would never lie and tell people I fought in Vietnam.
What irks me is despite being a liar (saying he was a Ranger when he was a refrigerator repair man, saying he was honourably discharged, and saying he was in Vietnam) with a history of violence and jail time, he's a media darling, while some decent kids who did nothing wrong are being vilified and threatened with violence. It's an injustice.
This isn't about injustice, it's because you have a win over the 'leftist' media. Like the right wing press wouldn't do exactly the same in reverse. This faux outrage is transparent.
But some people are carrying it on and on because it suits their agenda, not because they are actually bothered about the kids. That's the 'faux'. I agree that what happened to them was totally wrong. But again, some people would not say a word if it was 'leftist' kids that were libelled by the right wing press. If you are outraged by the press actions, then be outraged by their actions regardless of which 'side' is the victim.
Both sides as bad as each other. So it's a bit rich to be doing the whole 'booo look at CNN!!' squeal for days and days after, when they wouldn't say a word if it was the other way round.
Bookmarks