"Drown in a vat of whiskey.....death where is thy sting?" - W.C. Fields.
A lot of people are against diversity but I am not. It's funny how the people who are against diversity head straight for the falafel and shawarma stands at night when they get out of the bars, yes indeed I see hordes of white people leaving bars at 2 in the morning and heading straight to the Bangladeshi food trucks serving lamb over rice and falafel over rice and the halal food carts. What would a city be without several Indian buffets? What would a city be without several Chinese dim sum places? without Jamaican jerk chicken and jerk pork places? what would a city be if it was just steak and potatoes everywhere you looked?
Diversity is a great thing in and of itself and it enriches a homogeneous society.
I love diversity.
You don't need to dismantle an entire culture in order to have a few kebab shops in town. They do kebabs in the department store here. The bloke went to Turkey, took the method, and brought it back. The chicken kebab he does is no different. Turkish kebab, no Turks, and the enrichment is still done.
Meanwhile, a Muslim man married to a Korean has just been done for bigamy having tried to bring in his daughter from the other wife into the country. Nope, you can still have the food without importing the culture.
Even if you do import kebab shop owners. Let's say 10 for every city. It is a few thousand people and no more ever again. They can hire locals and even have locals competing and that sounds fair.
It does not carry on at 300,000 a year indefinitely.
Cultural enrichment happens via people from those cultures, not merely the food.
It takes all types to make the world go round.
Yes, more foreign taxi drivers, kebab shops and Sharia courts then. It is more diverse to invite in polygamy too, but it is more practical to bring in skilled efficient people who will actually add to an economy. If you do not have a skill then why would anyone want you? It is not creepy, it is practical.
Nobody is stopping the left from moving elsewhere to satiate their need for diversity. They can go to Bangladesh if they want, why turn London into Pakistan instead?
In fact where 70% of the populace wants far less immigration, not more, then why bring in anyone more at all? The public have had their fill of diversity.
I disagree. So much so that I started a thread just for that.
"You're a big man, but you're in bad shape. With me it's a full time job. Now behave yourself..."
I have never argued against sensible immigration that considers the interests of the local populace.
The policy is offensive to British people. Look at any poll. They are against it.
It is not racist to say that British culture is under threat and that the party you two support wants more of it. A projected 3 million more in the next decade and 80% of kids born to migrants already.
It is an unnatural experiment.
Correction: Including kids population increase is 84% driven by migration. I got carried away.
So then why don't the whites have kids? In 25 years whites, Korean and Japanese will be gone, they aren't having babies, they're done, obsolete, extinct, something is terrible wrong with their cuckish NEGATIVE BIRTH RATES, so don't complaining if replanish population via immigration!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)