Boxing Forums


.



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,578
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    399
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    19,127
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1507
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    You don't want to see Wilder fight Joshua, rather a bunch of guys Joshua already beat plus two that no one really cares about? Weird.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Fenay, Longvic
    Posts
    1,700
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    I want to see Wilder fight Joshua

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,009
    Mentioned
    165 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    255
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion
    Ruiz was granted an extension by the Springfield, New Jersey sanctioning body for the Joshua rematch. Both had to agree to face Pulev before May 31, 2020 or be stripped. Had Ruiz won, he may have faced Wilder next but that belt would be gone.
    They live, We sleep

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,578
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    399
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion
    Ruiz was granted an extension by the Springfield, New Jersey sanctioning body for the Joshua rematch. Both had to agree to face Pulev before May 31, 2020 or be stripped. Had Ruiz won, he may have faced Wilder next but that belt would be gone.
    Wilder has Fury lined up. That Pulev mandatory can be handled, they haven’t even said for sure which mandatory will be executed first. Eddie has already said they will drop one belt then unify that after whichever they handle first. And if you look back you can see me saying the exact same thing,,,,2 years ago.

    When they were spreading the lie that they had to face Pulev I said “you can drop the belt, make the big fight, then return to fight whoever picks up that belt and it’s a bigger fight because it’s a unification” the only difference between now and what I said is when I said it,,,,2 years ago,,,,Joshua wouldn’t have lost a belt because he would give one up and gain one if he won.

    Look it up, it’s on this site, you don’t have to search anywhere but here. And again, 2 years ago I suggested they could do what they plan to do. So, they are proving me right, and simultaneously proving their story was BS. As I said 2 years ago.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,133
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    439
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion
    Ruiz was granted an extension by the Springfield, New Jersey sanctioning body for the Joshua rematch. Both had to agree to face Pulev before May 31, 2020 or be stripped. Had Ruiz won, he may have faced Wilder next but that belt would be gone.
    Wilder has Fury lined up. That Pulev mandatory can be handled, they haven’t even said for sure which mandatory will be executed first. Eddie has already said they will drop one belt then unify that after whichever they handle first. And if you look back you can see me saying the exact same thing,,,,2 years ago.

    When they were spreading the lie that they had to face Pulev I said “you can drop the belt, make the big fight, then return to fight whoever picks up that belt and it’s a bigger fight because it’s a unification” the only difference between now and what I said is when I said it,,,,2 years ago,,,,Joshua wouldn’t have lost a belt because he would give one up and gain one if he won.

    Look it up, it’s on this site, you don’t have to search anywhere but here. And again, 2 years ago I suggested they could do what they plan to do. So, they are proving me right, and simultaneously proving their story was BS. As I said 2 years ago.
    Except Joshua says he ain’t giving up any belts.... look , he may have no choice , but either way, it don’t make Eddie Pinocchio and it don’t make you the great soothsayer.
    He said, she said, he said , she said. We know they ALL LIE. Booooooooring.
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,009
    Mentioned
    165 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    255
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion
    Ruiz was granted an extension by the Springfield, New Jersey sanctioning body for the Joshua rematch. Both had to agree to face Pulev before May 31, 2020 or be stripped. Had Ruiz won, he may have faced Wilder next but that belt would be gone.
    Wilder has Fury lined up. That Pulev mandatory can be handled, they haven’t even said for sure which mandatory will be executed first. Eddie has already said they will drop one belt then unify that after whichever they handle first. And if you look back you can see me saying the exact same thing,,,,2 years ago.

    When they were spreading the lie that they had to face Pulev I said “you can drop the belt, make the big fight, then return to fight whoever picks up that belt and it’s a bigger fight because it’s a unification” the only difference between now and what I said is when I said it,,,,2 years ago,,,,Joshua wouldn’t have lost a belt because he would give one up and gain one if he won.

    Look it up, it’s on this site, you don’t have to search anywhere but here. And again, 2 years ago I suggested they could do what they plan to do. So, they are proving me right, and simultaneously proving their story was BS. As I said 2 years ago.
    I was mainly reply to your post #14 in this thread, where you said if Ruiz had won, a unification with Wilder would have happened. It wouldn't have happened with the belt that Pulev is mandatory for. Unless Ruiz honoured the mandatory with Pulev 1st.

    I don't care about the belts, so I agree with you that belts should be dropped if necessary to make big fights.

    You seem to feel the belts are necessary to claim undisputed status. I have asked before, but I'll try again, what do you consider undisputed?
    They live, We sleep

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,578
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    399
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion
    Ruiz was granted an extension by the Springfield, New Jersey sanctioning body for the Joshua rematch. Both had to agree to face Pulev before May 31, 2020 or be stripped. Had Ruiz won, he may have faced Wilder next but that belt would be gone.
    Wilder has Fury lined up. That Pulev mandatory can be handled, they haven’t even said for sure which mandatory will be executed first. Eddie has already said they will drop one belt then unify that after whichever they handle first. And if you look back you can see me saying the exact same thing,,,,2 years ago.

    When they were spreading the lie that they had to face Pulev I said “you can drop the belt, make the big fight, then return to fight whoever picks up that belt and it’s a bigger fight because it’s a unification” the only difference between now and what I said is when I said it,,,,2 years ago,,,,Joshua wouldn’t have lost a belt because he would give one up and gain one if he won.

    Look it up, it’s on this site, you don’t have to search anywhere but here. And again, 2 years ago I suggested they could do what they plan to do. So, they are proving me right, and simultaneously proving their story was BS. As I said 2 years ago.
    I was mainly reply to your post #14 in this thread, where you said if Ruiz had won, a unification with Wilder would have happened. It wouldn't have happened with the belt that Pulev is mandatory for. Unless Ruiz honoured the mandatory with Pulev 1st.

    I don't care about the belts, so I agree with you that belts should be dropped if necessary to make big fights.

    You seem to feel the belts are necessary to claim undisputed status. I have asked before, but I'll try again, what do you consider undisputed?
    Depends on the scenario, obviously if someone gets all 4 major belts then they are undisputed. If someone has beaten all the top contenders they are undisputed in my mind.

    I only care about the fights, but as you have seen they are rehashing an old reason to swerve the fight we want and some here are selling the 3rd time they have tried this same excuse as if it’s new. I just want people to remember they used this same excuse 2 years ago. So I’ll be annoying repeating myself because the pretenders will keep repeating themselves.

    Kudos on not turning to insults by the way. I don’t get why so many do that, we all just want to talk about boxing

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,095
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    647
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Fatboxingfan View Post
    Greatest points in this thread are by Fenster, who does said it "Wilder/Fury have a 3rd fight Claus", is is the reason WHY AJ will be shuth out of the competition for longer and long time until he again get sparked and that's cat is really out of those bag. Fury of the 3 fighter will be FIRST to resigne, and Wilder will to be too old after 2020. So, that's!
    But is there a sanity clause? They're in every contract

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Fenay, Longvic
    Posts
    1,700
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by palmerq View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fatboxingfan View Post
    Greatest points in this thread are by Fenster, who does said it "Wilder/Fury have a 3rd fight Claus", is is the reason WHY AJ will be shuth out of the competition for longer and long time until he again get sparked and that's cat is really out of those bag. Fury of the 3 fighter will be FIRST to resigne, and Wilder will to be too old after 2020. So, that's!
    But is there a sanity clause? They're in every contract
    Take out the "i" and it's Santy Claus

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,009
    Mentioned
    165 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    255
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion
    Ruiz was granted an extension by the Springfield, New Jersey sanctioning body for the Joshua rematch. Both had to agree to face Pulev before May 31, 2020 or be stripped. Had Ruiz won, he may have faced Wilder next but that belt would be gone.
    Wilder has Fury lined up. That Pulev mandatory can be handled, they haven’t even said for sure which mandatory will be executed first. Eddie has already said they will drop one belt then unify that after whichever they handle first. And if you look back you can see me saying the exact same thing,,,,2 years ago.

    When they were spreading the lie that they had to face Pulev I said “you can drop the belt, make the big fight, then return to fight whoever picks up that belt and it’s a bigger fight because it’s a unification” the only difference between now and what I said is when I said it,,,,2 years ago,,,,Joshua wouldn’t have lost a belt because he would give one up and gain one if he won.

    Look it up, it’s on this site, you don’t have to search anywhere but here. And again, 2 years ago I suggested they could do what they plan to do. So, they are proving me right, and simultaneously proving their story was BS. As I said 2 years ago.
    I was mainly reply to your post #14 in this thread, where you said if Ruiz had won, a unification with Wilder would have happened. It wouldn't have happened with the belt that Pulev is mandatory for. Unless Ruiz honoured the mandatory with Pulev 1st.

    I don't care about the belts, so I agree with you that belts should be dropped if necessary to make big fights.

    You seem to feel the belts are necessary to claim undisputed status. I have asked before, but I'll try again, what do you consider undisputed?
    Depends on the scenario, obviously if someone gets all 4 major belts then they are undisputed. If someone has beaten all the top contenders they are undisputed in my mind.

    I only care about the fights, but as you have seen they are rehashing an old reason to swerve the fight we want and some here are selling the 3rd time they have tried this same excuse as if it’s new. I just want people to remember they used this same excuse 2 years ago. So I’ll be annoying repeating myself because the pretenders will keep repeating themselves.

    Kudos on not turning to insults by the way. I don’t get why so many do that, we all just want to talk about boxing
    All good mate, I don't throw insults unless they are thrown my way 1st. We can have civil discussions without ad hominem.

    I personally think undisputed is a difficult thing to fulfill these days, as there will always be another challenger to dispute the title. It is very rear these days that a fighter completely cleans out every challenger in a division (Usyk for example, Lebedev was still in the division and had run Gassiev to a very close fight). Even lineal is difficult, who decides the #1 and #2? Winning all 4 belts can also be tough, but should be enough to start a new lineage in my opinion.

    I also just care about the fights. You do you mate, keep repeating yourself as much as you need to, I do.
    They live, We sleep

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,007
    Mentioned
    406 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2832
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Skipping over the BS the spin doctors want to spin. As I told you when Joshua was saying he needed to take care of his mandatories in 2017 against Pulev(funny how full circle we have come) I told you you can run that circle forever. (Funny how exactly right I am proving to be) Sure Pulev pulled out and it turned out to be Takam but the point remains.

    The important part is if people want to unify they can unify. If they don’t want to unify they will make excuses. That’s what Fenny is doing, and he knows it. He’s selling you excuses. Because the UK guy is a little shook and looking for time. It’s fair enough, but don’t for a second believe lies about needing to handle mandatories.If they want the fight everyone will jump on board to make the fight.(it’s written into the f’n rules of the IBF) Delaying is delaying and any excuse is only that, an excuse.

    I know I ask you all to acknowledge the truth often, but people lie often so here I am again saying don’t back the BS. It makes this place look like a circle jerk rather than intelligent discussion
    Ruiz was granted an extension by the Springfield, New Jersey sanctioning body for the Joshua rematch. Both had to agree to face Pulev before May 31, 2020 or be stripped. Had Ruiz won, he may have faced Wilder next but that belt would be gone.
    And so would the WBO be gone, as Ruiz would have to face Uysk. However, Al Haymon/PBC won't even deal with the WBO or recognise them, so that title was 100% getting vacated if Ruiz won - hence Uysk fights for it regardless.

    This was all common knowledge beforehand. Usyk's manager laid it all out after the Witherspoon fight.

    Paco Valcárcel (WBO honcho) immediately tweeted after Ruiz-Johua - Clash of the Dunes is over..now clash of mandatories will be next..WBO mandatory challenger Uysk within 180 days . @eddieHearn, @DazN_USA, @SkySportsBoxing
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Fenay, Longvic
    Posts
    1,700
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    #ValcarcelForPrez

  14. #29
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    20,853
    Mentioned
    451 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1654
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    I can live without it quite frankly. lol.... But Wilder v Fury 2 is a must. Would like to see Wilder in with other competition however. Just to see the resume pile up.

    Wilder vs Pulev, Povetkin, Ruiz, Whyte, Miller or Mr "I am Very Feel"/Usyk would be ok for me.

    I on the other hand would LOVE to see it. First it's the fight fans have been clamoring for since Joshua beat Wlad over two years ago. Second... their styles are going to force action to occur. Joshua will not be able to fight Wilder like he apparently (didn't watch it) fought the rematch with Moby Dick. AJ will have to engage.... it will be an action-packed fight. Tyson has fought ONE fan-friendly fight in the last several years....... ONE. And that was against Wilder.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Fenay, Longvic
    Posts
    1,700
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I don't want to see Joshua v Wilder anymore!

    Welcome back, Titofan.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-03-2018, 12:17 AM
  2. Before Wilder/Joshua...
    By ykdadamaja in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 09-17-2017, 09:45 AM
  3. Wilder talks Joshua.
    By Spicoli in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-17-2017, 06:35 AM
  4. Joshua-Wilder.
    By VG_Addict in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-03-2017, 11:09 PM
  5. Wilder wants Joshua
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-17-2015, 04:00 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  





Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Videos | Boxing Forum | Boxing Books | Boxing Posters | Learn to Box | Advanced Fighting Methods | Boxing Rankings | Boxing Schedule | Auctions | Fun and Games | Boxing Equipment

Copyright © 2000 - 2019 Saddo Boxing - Boxing