Re: FURY vs Wilder 3?
The first fight was 8-4 to Fury with Fury knocked down twice. Almost knocked out. But yes, I think Fury was the better boxer.
Originally Posted by nuggetdotcom
This fight was one sided, but only properly one sided from the 3rd and there are question marks due to equilibrium issues. Now, I understand many will disagree, but that is my stance and I have never denied that Fury won it convincingly and I have said he deserves credit. He was the better boxer.
In saying that though, there is a rematch clause and if Wilder believes he was not 100%, then he has the right to accept less money and make the fight happen again. I just don't have an objection to that and applaud a man willing to face a challenge even if it could result in Wilder no longer being in the mix at the top. I have to respect him if he is willing to do that and I wouldn't rule out a 3rd or 4th knockdown from him either and Fury would be favorite.
Fury is the better boxer, no doubt about it, but boxing is not only about winning rounds as Wilder's career has shown.