Some Interesting views here....
https://amp.reddit.com/r/badunitedki...ted_naturally/
Some Interesting views here....
https://amp.reddit.com/r/badunitedki...ted_naturally/
Arresting him for assault , but not arresting the guy who his daughter says molested her ? his wife also told police of the assault .
Remember reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol .
Had to watch that in two sittings. Regardless of what happened I find him a right nauseating cunt and difficult to listen to.
Just for the record, same boat, I'd probably do and say the same things and be looking at more than common assault.
Where we differ is that I wouldn't have posted an 'actually it's all about me' video online.
This is page one in the Tommy Robinson play book isn't it? Muslim bloke touching up young white girl. Followed by the white girl, or rather her father being treated badly by the authorities. It's right in his wheel house and just the kind of thing anyone pro Robinson love to lap up. You couldn't make it up. Or maybe you could?
I'm not saying he didn't touch up his kid. It might have happened exactly as she told it and the blokes a right filthy nonce. Then again, she might have been mistaken. Maybe, the young daughter of Tommy Robinson is very very wary of nasty brown men? Who knows.
Robinson saying that the bloke admitted it, that all three of them were kiddie fiddlers who were all feverishly deleting kiddie filth off of their phones whilst 'not' being arrested. All Robinson's words, nothing more. His issue is that he got arrested and the guy didn't. Maybe the guys account of things wasn't exactly the account Tommy gave, maybe there was information, witnesses, CCTV to the contrary. Who knows. All I know is that Tommy Robinson never seems to 'not' try to get arrested. And I'm going to need a bit more than Tommy Robinson telling me that the guy definitely needed to get arrested, before believing that the guy actually needed arresting.
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Is anyone surprised?
Ain't really the point though is it? Being annoying isn't against the law.....oh wait this is the UK we're talking about....IS being annoying against the law over there? Does it depend on who you're annoying? I get confused what with the double standards so prevalent over there in regards to enforcement of laws.Originally Posted by Memphis
Would anyone else put in Tommy's situation have reacted better or differently? I'm curious.
Nope, him being an annoying gobshite cunt TO ME! is irrelevant to what did or didn't happen to his daughter/him. I was merely adding my own commentary. People do that some times. Like Robinson continually stating as if it were fact that these three blokes were all paedophiles with something to hide on their telephones.
With your thorough understanding of the law over here Lyle I'm amazed you had to ask the question. Weird.
Do you see anything particularly wrong with Robinson getting arrested for what he did? He says he merely restrained the guy. The police say he repeatedly punched him if I remember rightly and I'm speculating myself here, but they're probably basing that on the blokes statement, eyewitness statements.
Lets pretend for a minute we can do this properly.
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
First off, I read your entire post, I caught this bit...
I was asking my question to other members of the forum who have yet to respond. But I understand why you would glean a personal attack from my post. That wasn't my intention of course, my apologies if that got you worked up.Originally Posted by Memphis
Now, as for this....
I was once of the belief that law here in the United States and over there in the UK was much like our shared language...the same, but a little different. Easiest thing to point to would be your libel/defamation laws vs ours. But in regards to migrants or racial/religious minorities recently in both America and in the UK the enforcement of common sense laws seem needlessly arbitrary and politically motivated.Originally Posted by Memphis
All this depends on what the person in question did or didn't do to Tommy's daughter. If that guy assaulted Tommy's daughter, I see 0 problem with Tommy beating the shit out of the guy (if he did which is of course in question), if the guy DIDN'T do anything to Tommy's daughter the it must be found out if Tommy held him against his will or beat him.Originally Posted by Memphis
I support a common sense approach.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks