Social Platform Vs. Media

[SlimTrae]

Definition - What does Social Platform mean?
A social platform is a web-based technology that enables the development, deployment and management of social media solutions and services. It provides the ability to create social media websites and services with complete social media network functionality


Media:
the main means of mass communication (broadcasting, publishing, and the internet) regarded collectively.

Its' a business, if you don't like who they promote or reject, then don't buy/use it.



Today in America, the current Prez shows his true bitch-like qualities by crying & whimpering on what each prez went through: negative coverage.

So, how did the founding dudes deal with it?


General George read negative coverage on him depicted as a traitor. Thomas Jefferson was called a N-word lover , mean spirited and a lowlife. He helped to start National Gazette that attacked Hamilton.


Secretary of War Henry Knox brought a copy of the paper into a meeting called “The Funeral of George Washington” which described a tyrannical executive on a guillotine. The Aurora was published by Benjamin Franklin’s grandson, Benjamin Franklin Bache, made the paper a mission to “destroy undue impressions in favor of Mr. Washington.”

If old punk ass pumpkin-man had lived in that day, check out what was said about the 1st prez of USA:

The Aurora published an article claiming the 1st Prez was arrogant, stupid, loved monarchy, a lousy general, a lukewarm patriot, incompetent executive, & he was accused of intentionally undermining the U.S. Constitution. As one of their correspondents wrote: “If ever a nation was debauched by a man, the American nation has been debauched by WASHINGTON! . . . Let the history of the federal government instruct mankind that the mask of patriotism may be worn to conceal the foulest designs against the liberties of a people.”


A letter preserved of President Washington reveals IMO what a real man and leader would've said, I quote: "...this kind of representations is an evil which must be placed in opposition to the infinite benefits resulting from a free Press.”

In other words, he did not think he could or should declare war on it. He used free speech to compromise what he felt were lies to that of the truth, for if he felt he himself was the bearer of truth, then he is complicit in denying just that (free speech) to identify each own as to what was truth and what was false.

Now in USA we have a prez who flaunts his disdain for media on social platforms (coincidentally created by liberals) to execute the media as incompetent, fake & false. It seems as if he wants to ride ALL media that speaks ill of him.
Just consider the 1st time he accused media.

In 2016 it was FOX after Megyn Kelly questioned how he spoke on other's infidelity, but not his own. She was canned. And they became his launch pad. If FB or Twitter bans who the POTUS likes, they are accused of media bias in favor of an ideolog only (liberalism). If they acquiesce, then they are spared his verbal wrath.

And wherever tyrants ruled? Are the places where free speech was ruled a lie & there democracy and truth died.

[SlimTrae]

When Washington chose to write his Farewell Address in a newspaper.


It would not be on his long-standing partisan ally John Fenno of the Federalist Gazette. Instead he chose the American Daily Advertiser. Its editorial view was independent of the views of either federalist (modern day Republicans) and anti-federalists modern day Democrats.

Whereas this current prez demeans all major/minor publications except ones that kisses his orange tush. Breitbart blogs, OAN conservative ran local tv stations are promoted by him as truth.

This soon-to-be prez stated why he would not attend the FOX debate because of get this: I dont like the press release they gave. It's like they're playing games and I am sure you will be there Brett"



And one of the most trash talked guys by Drumpf, Mr. Colbert was oh no! the one who Trump visited. meaning he can tell his worshippers to boycott FOX, then afterwards go hate Colbert...and that they did do.



And wherever tyrants ruled? Were the places where free speech was ruled a lie & there democracy and truth died.

[SlimTrae]

Twitter is not the media, it is a social platform used for nothing special. A place to chat, send notes or a quick hello.


He uses it as a political platform and if they question him they are in the wrong.

Facebook is at its name suggests, a virtual book to display who you are, so as long as approved by the owners, but not to this orange barf-bag If he uses it, they must comply.

[SlimTrae]

This Orange diaper stain tells his unrivaled worshippers that if people boycott Goya , they are wrong, but what about when he told his minions to boycott Nabisco?



Hey at least in Mexico Don the Diva makes mucho dinero selling piñatas!!




Why? because of his use of twitter, FB & any other media that allows him to label Mexicans in a way that they will buy something to beat the candy out of it, because of what/who resembles.

[Spicoli]

Unfortunately we're at the point where social platforms are very much considered and boosted up as fact checked news sources. We often yell fake news rather than refuting the cases and offering up the actual facts in dispute..often while politicians have literally the world press at a moments notice should they so desire. Basically we're dumbed down to copy and pasting other peoples tweets and memes. We flock to like minded narratives and tune other sources out. Oddly I can only imagine back in printed press and before the railways 'fake news' was actually more prevalent as options and instant availability were few and far between. Anyone whining about not being able to get their message out today is a fool.

[SlimTrae]

We flock to like minded narratives and tune other sources out.



Sign O the Times.